militarise

简明释义

英[ˈmɪlɪtəraɪz]美[ˈmɪlɪtəraɪz]

vt. 军国化；军事化

第 三 人 称 单 数 m i l i t a r i s e s

现 在 分 词 m i l i t a r i s i n g

过 去 式 m i l i t a r i s e d

过 去 分 词 m i l i t a r i s e d

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Many countries are concerned about the tendency to militarise space exploration.

许多国家对太空探索的军事化倾向感到担忧。

2.The documentary highlighted how certain nations militarise their youth through training camps.

这部纪录片强调了某些国家如何通过训练营来军事化他们的年轻人。

3.The government decided to militarise the region in response to increasing threats.

政府决定对该地区进行军事化以应对日益增加的威胁。

4.Some argue that the government is trying to militarise society through increased surveillance.

一些人认为政府试图通过加强监控来军事化社会。

5.The local community protested against plans to militarise the police force.

当地社区抗议将警察部队军事化的计划。

作文

In recent years, the world has witnessed a significant trend towards the increasing tendency to militarise various aspects of society. This phenomenon is not limited to nations with ongoing conflicts, but rather extends to countries that are generally considered peaceful. The process of militarising civilian sectors can have profound implications for both national security and social dynamics.One of the most notable areas where we see this militarisation is in law enforcement. Police forces in many countries have begun to adopt military-style tactics and equipment. This shift raises important questions about the role of police in society. Are they peacekeepers or enforcers? When a police force begins to militarise, it often leads to a more aggressive approach to law enforcement, which can escalate tensions between the police and the communities they serve. The use of military-grade weapons and vehicles can create an atmosphere of fear and distrust, undermining the very principles of community policing.Furthermore, the militarisation of everyday life can be seen in the way governments respond to protests and civil disobedience. In many instances, peaceful demonstrations have been met with overwhelming force, as authorities choose to militarise their response rather than engage in dialogue. This approach not only alienates citizens but also can lead to violent confrontations, further perpetuating a cycle of unrest.The militarisation of technology is another area of concern. With advancements in surveillance technology, governments are increasingly using military-grade tools to monitor their citizens. Drones, facial recognition software, and other forms of surveillance can infringe on privacy rights and create a society where individuals feel constantly watched. This erosion of privacy is often justified under the guise of national security, but it raises ethical questions about the balance between safety and freedom.Moreover, the militarisation of foreign policy has become increasingly prevalent. Many countries are adopting a more aggressive stance in international relations, prioritizing military solutions over diplomatic ones. The rhetoric surrounding national defense often emphasizes a need to militarise foreign aid and development efforts, suggesting that military intervention is a viable option for addressing global issues such as poverty, terrorism, and human rights abuses. This approach can lead to unintended consequences, including destabilization of regions and increased hostility towards the intervening nation.In conclusion, the trend to militarise various aspects of society poses significant challenges. While there may be legitimate reasons for enhancing security measures, it is crucial to consider the broader implications of such actions. The militarisation of law enforcement, technology, and foreign policy can undermine democratic values and contribute to a culture of fear and mistrust. As citizens, we must remain vigilant and advocate for policies that prioritize dialogue, understanding, and respect for human rights over militaristic approaches. Only then can we hope to build a society that values peace and cooperation above all else.

近年来，世界目睹了一个显著的趋势，即越来越多的社会各个方面开始趋向于军事化。这一现象不仅限于正在进行冲突的国家，还扩展到那些通常被认为是和平的国家。军事化民用部门的过程可能对国家安全和社会动态产生深远的影响。最显著的一个领域就是执法。在许多国家，警察部队开始采用军事风格的战术和装备。这一转变引发了关于警察在社会中角色的重要问题。他们是维和者还是执行者？当警察部队开始军事化时，往往会导致更激进的执法方式，这可能加剧警察与他们服务的社区之间的紧张关系。使用军用级武器和车辆可能会造成恐惧和不信任的氛围，破坏社区警务的基本原则。此外，军事化日常生活的现象可以在政府应对抗议和公民不服从的方式中看到。在许多情况下，和平示威遭到了压倒性的武力回应，因为当局选择军事化他们的反应，而不是进行对话。这种做法不仅使公民疏远，而且可能导致暴力冲突，从而进一步延续动荡的循环。技术的军事化也是一个令人担忧的领域。随着监控技术的进步，各国政府越来越多地使用军用级工具来监视其公民。无人机、人脸识别软件以及其他形式的监控可能侵犯隐私权，并创造出一个个人感到被持续监视的社会。这种隐私的侵蚀通常以国家安全的名义被合理化，但它引发了关于安全与自由之间平衡的伦理问题。此外，外交政策的军事化变得越来越普遍。许多国家在国际关系中采取了更具攻击性的立场，优先考虑军事解决方案而非外交方案。围绕国家防御的言辞常常强调需要将军事干预与外援和发展努力相结合，这暗示军事干预是解决贫困、恐怖主义和人权侵犯等全球问题的可行选项。这种做法可能导致意想不到的后果，包括地区的不稳定和对干预国的敌意增加。总之，军事化社会各个方面的趋势带来了重大挑战。尽管增强安全措施可能有合理的理由，但必须考虑这些行动的更广泛影响。执法、技术和外交政策的军事化可能破坏民主价值观，并助长恐惧和不信任的文化。作为公民，我们必须保持警惕，倡导优先考虑对话、理解和尊重人权的政策，而不是军事化的方法。只有这样，我们才能希望建立一个重视和平与合作的社会。