subsidiarity
简明释义
英[/səbˌsɪdiˈærɪti/]美[/səbˌsɪdiˈærɪti/]
n. 辅助性原则
英英释义
The principle that matters ought to be handled by the smallest, lowest, or least centralized competent authority. | 一个原则,即事务应由最小、最低或最不集中化的有能力的权威处理。 |
单词用法
同义词
反义词
例句
1.The significance of subsidiarity consists in providing a procedural guarantee for the correct choice of who will be the best to exercise the power among European Union, member states and other bodies.
辅助性原则最大的意义在于:为在欧盟和成员国或其他主体之间选择最为合适的权力行使主体提供了程序性的保障,因而提供了一个促进协调以取得平衡的重要概念空间。
2.In accordance with the principle of subsidiarity, neither the state nor any larger society should substitute itself for the initiative and responsibility of individuals and intermediary bodies.
按照辅助性的原则,不论是国家抑或较大的社会,都不应取代个人和中间团体的主动性及责任感。
3.The significance of subsidiarity consists in providing a procedural guarantee for the correct choice of who will be the best to exercise the power among European Union, member states and other bodies.
辅助性原则最大的意义在于:为在欧盟和成员国或其他主体之间选择最为合适的权力行使主体提供了程序性的保障,因而提供了一个促进协调以取得平衡的重要概念空间。
4.The organization adopted subsidiarity to empower local branches in decision-making processes.
该组织采用了补充原则,以赋予地方分支在决策过程中的权力。
5.Many argue that subsidiarity leads to more effective and responsive governance.
许多人认为补充原则会导致更有效和更具响应性的治理。
6.The principle of subsidiarity ensures that decisions are made at the most local level possible.
《补充原则》确保决策在尽可能地方的层面上做出。
7.The concept of subsidiarity can be seen in community organizations that prioritize local input.
在优先考虑地方意见的社区组织中可以看到补充原则的概念。
8.In the European Union, subsidiarity is a guiding principle for governance, allowing member states to retain authority.
在欧盟中,补充原则是治理的指导原则,允许成员国保留权力。
作文
The concept of subsidiarity plays a crucial role in both political theory and practical governance. It is derived from the Latin word 'subsidiarius', which means 'to aid or support'. In essence, subsidiarity suggests that matters ought to be handled by the smallest, lowest, or least centralized competent authority. This principle is particularly relevant in discussions about the distribution of power and responsibilities within governments and organizations.To understand subsidiarity, one must consider its implications in various contexts. For instance, in a federal system of government, subsidiarity would advocate for local governments to manage local issues, while national governments should focus on broader concerns that require centralized oversight. This approach not only empowers communities but also enhances efficiency by ensuring that decisions are made closer to those affected by them.Moreover, subsidiarity encourages participation at all levels of governance. When local entities are given the authority to make decisions, it fosters a sense of ownership and accountability among citizens. People are more likely to engage with their local governments when they see that their voices matter and that they have the power to influence outcomes. This participatory aspect of subsidiarity is essential for a healthy democracy, as it promotes transparency and responsiveness.In the context of the European Union, the principle of subsidiarity is enshrined in its treaties. The EU operates on the belief that decisions should be made at the most local level possible unless action at a higher level is justified. This principle has been instrumental in shaping policies that respect the diversity of member states while promoting cooperation and unity. By adhering to subsidiarity, the EU aims to strike a balance between regional autonomy and collective action.However, the application of subsidiarity is not without challenges. There are instances where higher authorities may overstep their bounds, undermining local governance. This can lead to frustration and disillusionment among citizens who feel that their needs are overlooked. Therefore, it is essential for both local and central authorities to communicate effectively and work collaboratively to address issues that transcend local capabilities.In conclusion, the principle of subsidiarity is vital for effective governance and democratic engagement. By advocating for decision-making at the most appropriate level, subsidiarity not only enhances efficiency but also empowers citizens. As societies continue to evolve, the relevance of subsidiarity will persist, reminding us of the importance of local governance and community involvement in shaping our collective future.
“补充性原则”在政治理论和实际治理中发挥着至关重要的作用。它源于拉丁词“subsidiarius”,意为“援助或支持”。从本质上讲,补充性原则建议事务应由最小、最低或最不集中化的有能力的权威机构处理。这个原则在讨论政府和组织内部权力和责任分配时尤为相关。要理解补充性原则,人们必须考虑其在各种背景下的影响。例如,在联邦制政府中,补充性原则将倡导地方政府管理地方事务,而国家政府则应集中精力关注需要中央监督的更广泛问题。这种方法不仅赋予社区权力,还通过确保决策离受影响者更近而提高效率。此外,补充性原则鼓励各级治理的参与。当地方实体被赋予决策权时,它会在公民中培养一种归属感和责任感。当人们看到自己的声音很重要,并且他们有能力影响结果时,他们更可能与地方政府互动。这种补充性原则的参与性对于健康的民主制度至关重要,因为它促进了透明度和响应性。在欧盟的背景下,补充性原则被写入其条约。欧盟基于这样的信念:除非更高水平的行动是合理的,否则决策应在尽可能地方的层面上进行。这一原则在塑造尊重成员国多样性的政策方面发挥了重要作用,同时促进了合作与团结。通过遵循补充性原则,欧盟旨在在区域自治与集体行动之间取得平衡。然而,补充性原则的应用并非没有挑战。有时候,高层当局可能会超越其权限,破坏地方治理。这可能导致公民的不满和失望,因为他们感到自己的需求被忽视。因此,地方和中央当局之间有效沟通和协作以解决超出地方能力的问题至关重要。总之,补充性原则对于有效治理和民主参与至关重要。通过倡导在最合适的层面上进行决策,补充性原则不仅提高了效率,还赋予了公民权力。随着社会的不断发展,补充性原则的相关性将持续存在,提醒我们地方治理和社区参与在塑造我们共同未来中的重要性。