polygraph

简明释义

英[ˈpɒliɡrɑːf]美[ˈpɑːliɡræf]

n. 测谎器；复写器；多种波动描记器

复 数 p o l y g r a p h s

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.The camera also correctly identified 11 of the 12 people who were telling the truth - a slightly better rate than the polygraph.

摄像机也从12位说实话者中正确地识别出11人，稍强于测谎仪。

2.Polygraph evidence is admissible in court, as long as it can be demonstrated that it was used with care and by a trained operator.

多项生理波动测试仪收集的证据是法庭所承认的，只要表面过程中操作严格并且由受过特训的人员操作即可。

3.39 Thus, polygraph tests suffer from a high rate of "false positives" - innocent people whom the test deems guilty.40.

因此，测谎机的假阳性率极高，无辜的人也会被确认为有罪。

4.The entry for 'polygraph' is cross-referred to the entry for 'lie detector'.

词条polygraph下注有指向词条lie detector的参照项。

5.The wizards' success rate was even higher than the traditional polygraph test, which is used in the us and is claimed to have a 60% to 70% success rate.

这些测谎员的成功率甚至比传统的测谎仪还要高，这种传统的测谎被美国所使用，并且声称有高达60%到70%的成功率。

6.The next day, she was called in for a polygraph.

第二天，她被要求在一个测谎。

7.'We don't believe the polygraph is a 21st-century technology.'

‘我们认为测谎仪不是一项21世纪的技术。’

8.The results of the polygraph showed that he was telling the truth.

测谎仪的结果显示他在说真话。

9.She felt nervous about taking the polygraph because she had never done it before.

她对接受测谎仪感到紧张，因为她从未做过这件事。

10.The detective used a polygraph to determine if the suspect was lying.

侦探使用测谎仪来判断嫌疑人是否在撒谎。

11.In court, the judge allowed the polygraph results as evidence.

在法庭上，法官允许将测谎仪结果作为证据。

12.During the job interview, the company required candidates to take a polygraph test.

在求职面试中，公司要求候选人进行测谎仪测试。

作文

The use of a polygraph (测谎仪) has long been a subject of intrigue and debate. Often referred to as a lie detector, the polygraph is a device that measures physiological responses such as heart rate, blood pressure, respiratory rate, and skin conductivity while a person answers questions. The underlying premise is that deceptive answers will produce physiological responses that can be differentiated from truthful ones. However, the reliability and validity of the polygraph have been contested by many experts in psychology and law enforcement.In the realm of criminal justice, the polygraph is frequently employed during investigations. Law enforcement agencies may use it to gauge whether a suspect is being truthful about their involvement in a crime. For instance, if a suspect claims they were not at the scene of a robbery, a polygraph test may be administered to assess the truthfulness of their statement. The results can sometimes influence the direction of an investigation or the decision to pursue charges.Despite its widespread use, there are significant concerns regarding the accuracy of polygraph tests. Critics argue that the physiological responses measured by the device can be influenced by various factors unrelated to deception, such as anxiety, fear, or even medical conditions. This raises questions about the ethical implications of using a polygraph as a definitive tool for determining guilt or innocence. Furthermore, the legal admissibility of polygraph results varies by jurisdiction, with some courts accepting them as evidence while others do not.In addition to its application in criminal investigations, the polygraph is also used in employment screenings, particularly for positions that require a high level of trust, such as law enforcement or government jobs. Employers may seek to ensure that potential hires are honest about their backgrounds and qualifications. However, this practice has sparked debates about privacy rights and the potential for discrimination based on physiological responses rather than factual information.The psychological aspects of polygraph testing are equally fascinating. Some individuals may experience heightened stress during a test, which could lead to false positives—indicating deception when the individual is actually telling the truth. Conversely, a skilled liar may remain calm and produce physiological responses that do not indicate deceit, thus potentially passing the test. This inconsistency highlights the complexity of human behavior and the challenges of measuring it accurately.In conclusion, the polygraph (测谎仪) remains a controversial tool in both law enforcement and employment contexts. While it offers a method for assessing truthfulness, the limitations and potential for misinterpretation must be carefully considered. As technology continues to evolve, alternative methods for detecting deception are being explored, including voice stress analysis and brain imaging techniques. Ultimately, the quest for reliable truth verification remains an ongoing challenge in our pursuit of justice and honesty in society.

测谎仪的使用长期以来一直是一个引人入胜和有争议的话题。它通常被称为谎言探测器，polygraph（测谎仪）是一种在个人回答问题时测量生理反应的设备，如心率、血压、呼吸频率和皮肤导电性。其基本前提是欺骗性答案会产生可以与真实答案区分开的生理反应。然而，许多心理学和执法领域的专家对polygraph的可靠性和有效性提出了质疑。在刑事司法领域，polygraph经常在调查过程中使用。执法机构可能会使用它来判断嫌疑人是否在关于其参与犯罪的陈述中诚实。例如，如果嫌疑人声称他们不在抢劫现场，则可能会进行polygraph测试以评估其陈述的真实性。结果有时会影响调查的方向或决定是否追究指控。尽管广泛使用，但关于polygraph测试准确性的重大担忧依然存在。批评者认为，设备测量的生理反应可能受到与欺骗无关的各种因素的影响，例如焦虑、恐惧，甚至是医疗状况。这引发了对将polygraph作为确定有罪或无罪的明确工具的伦理含义的质疑。此外，polygraph结果的法律可采性因管辖区而异，一些法院接受其作为证据，而另一些则不接受。除了在刑事调查中的应用，polygraph还用于就业筛选，特别是对于需要高度信任的职位，如执法或政府工作。雇主可能希望确保潜在雇员在其背景和资格方面诚实。然而，这一做法引发了关于隐私权和基于生理反应而非事实信息的潜在歧视的辩论。polygraph测试的心理学方面同样引人入胜。一些人在测试期间可能会经历高度压力，这可能导致误判——即在个人实际上讲真话时显示出欺骗。而一位熟练的说谎者可能保持冷静，产生不会表明欺骗的生理反应，从而可能通过测试。这种不一致性突显了人类行为的复杂性以及准确测量其行为的挑战。总之，polygraph（测谎仪）在执法和就业背景中仍然是一个有争议的工具。虽然它提供了一种评估真实性的方法，但必须仔细考虑其局限性和误解的潜力。随着技术的不断发展，检测欺骗的替代方法正在被探索，包括声音压力分析和脑成像技术。最终，在我们追求社会公正和诚实的过程中，可靠的真相验证仍然是一个持续的挑战。