slant
简明释义
v. （使）倾斜，（使）歪斜；有偏向性地陈述，带偏向性地报道
n. 倾斜，歪斜；（有倾向性的）观点，态度
adj. 斜的
复 数 s l a n t s
第 三 人 称 单 数 s l a n t s
现 在 分 词 s l a n t i n g
过 去 式 s l a n t e d
过 去 分 词 s l a n t e d
英英释义
从直线或位置倾斜或倾斜。 | |
一种特定的观点或意见，通常带有偏见。 | |
一个不平坦的表面；一个角度或斜坡。 |
单词用法
倾斜范围（等于slant distance） |
同义词
| 倾斜 | 屋顶有轻微的倾斜以便雨水排出。 | ||
| 角度 | 他试图调整相机的角度以获得更好的拍摄效果。 | ||
| 倾斜 | 她在等的时候靠在墙上。 | ||
| 偏见 | 这篇文章明显偏向某个政党。 |
反义词
| 直的 | 前方的道路是直的，容易导航。 | ||
| 平坦的 | Make sure the picture frame is level before hanging it on the wall. | 在把画框挂在墙上之前，确保它是水平的。 |
例句
1.Having the slant of a bevel.
具有斜面的倾斜特点。
2.The wooden floor has a noticeable slant.
这木地板可以看得出有些倾斜。
3.This merger may be bad for Apple, so we see an automatic negative slant from CNN.
这次合并也许是坏得对苹果来说，所以我们能从CNN上看到一个必然的负面消息。
4.The other is the choice of topic and the slant of the reporting;
另一个是主题的选择和报道的偏见；
5.Your subordinate should be told about the missing section and told how (and why) to slant it.
你的级别是告诉下级缺掉部分和告诉他们它的重要性（和为什么）。
6.The political slant at Focus can be described as centre-right.
对福克斯的政治倾向可以描述成中间偏右。
7.Late this year the Capital Gate is set to be finished in Abu Dhabi at a slant of 18 degrees.
阿布扎比的“首都门”预计将于今年晚些时候完工，倾斜度为18度。
8.The overlapped area is shown in yellow with black slant lines.
交叠区域用黄色带黑色斜线来显示。
9.She held the paper at a slant to get a better view of the text.
她将纸张以一个斜角的方式拿着，以便更好地查看文本。
10.The roof has a steep slant that helps with rain runoff.
屋顶有一个陡峭的倾斜，有助于雨水排放。
11.The path has a gentle slant that makes it easy to walk.
这条小路有一个缓和的倾斜，走起来很轻松。
12.He took a slant on the project that was different from everyone else's.
他对这个项目采取了一个与其他人不同的观点。
13.The article had a clear political slant that favored one party over another.
这篇文章有明显的政治倾向，偏向某一政党。
作文
In today's world, the way we perceive information can be heavily influenced by the slant (倾斜) of the media. News outlets often present stories with a particular bias, which can shape public opinion and alter our understanding of events. This phenomenon is not new; throughout history, various forms of media have been known to take a slant (倾斜) on issues to align with their political or ideological beliefs. For instance, during election seasons, it is common for newspapers and television channels to favor certain candidates over others, presenting information in a way that highlights the strengths of one while downplaying the weaknesses of another.The slant (倾斜) of news coverage can lead to a polarized society where individuals only consume information that reinforces their existing beliefs. This echo chamber effect is particularly evident on social media platforms, where algorithms curate content based on user preferences. As a result, people may find themselves trapped in a cycle of confirmation bias, where they are exposed only to viewpoints that reflect their own. This can create a distorted view of reality, as individuals become less willing to consider alternative perspectives.Moreover, the slant (倾斜) in reporting can also affect how important issues are perceived by the public. For example, climate change is a critical global challenge, yet the way it is reported can vary significantly. Some media outlets may focus on the scientific consensus and the urgent need for action, while others might downplay the issue or present it as a contentious debate. This discrepancy can influence public perception and hinder collective action, as individuals may not fully grasp the severity of the situation due to the slant (倾斜) of the information they receive.To combat the effects of slant (倾斜) in media, it is essential for consumers to develop critical thinking skills. By analyzing multiple sources of information and seeking out diverse viewpoints, individuals can form a more balanced understanding of complex issues. Additionally, media literacy education can empower people to recognize bias and discern credible information from sensationalized reporting.In conclusion, the slant (倾斜) of information in the media plays a significant role in shaping our perceptions and beliefs. It is crucial for individuals to be aware of this influence and actively seek out a variety of perspectives to foster a more informed and engaged society. Only by confronting the slant (倾斜) in media can we hope to bridge divides and work towards solutions that benefit everyone.
在当今世界，我们对信息的感知可能会受到媒体的slant（倾斜）影响。新闻机构常常以特定的偏见呈现故事，这可以塑造公众舆论并改变我们对事件的理解。这种现象并不新鲜；在历史上，各种形式的媒体都以某种方式对问题进行slant（倾斜），以与他们的政治或意识形态信仰保持一致。例如，在选举季节，报纸和电视频道通常会偏爱某些候选人，呈现的信息突出一个人的优点，同时淡化另一个人的缺点。新闻报道中的slant（倾斜）可能导致一个极化的社会，个人只消费强化他们现有信念的信息。这种回音室效应在社交媒体平台上尤为明显，算法根据用户偏好策划内容。因此，人们可能发现自己陷入确认偏差的循环，只接触反映自己观点的信息。这可能导致对现实的扭曲看法，因为个人变得不愿考虑替代视角。此外，报道中的slant（倾斜）也可能影响公众对重要问题的看法。例如，气候变化是一个关键的全球挑战，但其报道方式可能大相径庭。一些媒体可能专注于科学共识和迫切需要采取行动，而其他媒体可能淡化这一问题或将其呈现为有争议的辩论。这种差异可能影响公众认知并阻碍集体行动，因为由于所接收信息的slant（倾斜），个人可能无法充分理解情况的严重性。为了对抗媒体中slant（倾斜）的影响，消费者发展批判性思维技能至关重要。通过分析多个信息来源并寻求多样化的观点，个人可以形成更平衡的复杂问题理解。此外，媒体素养教育可以使人们能够识别偏见并辨别可信信息与耸人听闻的报道。总之，媒体中信息的slant（倾斜）在塑造我们的认知和信念方面发挥着重要作用。个人意识到这种影响并积极寻求多种观点对于促进一个更知情和参与的社会至关重要。只有面对媒体中的slant（倾斜），我们才能希望弥合分歧，朝着有利于每个人的解决方案努力。
