doctrinairism

简明释义

英[ˌdɒktrɪˈneərɪzəm]美[ˌdɑːktrɪˈnerɪzm]

n. 教条主义；空谈理论

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Learning historic experience should fight against doctrinairism and oppose to deviating away from historic experience as well...

对历史经验的学习，既要反对教条主义式的照搬，也要反对对历史经验的背离。

2.Learning historic experience should fight against doctrinairism and oppose to deviating away from historic experience as well...

对历史经验的学习，既要反对教条主义式的照搬，也要反对对历史经验的背离。

3.His approach to education was criticized for its underlying doctrinairism, which stifled creativity.

他对教育的看法因其潜在的教条主义而受到批评，这抑制了创造力。

4.In discussions about policy, her doctrinairism often led to rigid conclusions that ignored practical realities.

在关于政策的讨论中，她的教条主义常常导致忽视实际现实的僵化结论。

5.The organization’s doctrinairism made it difficult to adapt to the changing social landscape.

该组织的教条主义使其难以适应不断变化的社会环境。

6.Many philosophers argue against doctrinairism in ethics, advocating for a more flexible approach.

许多哲学家反对伦理学中的教条主义，主张采取更灵活的方法。

7.His political views were often seen as a product of doctrinairism, lacking nuance and adaptability.

他的政治观点常被视为教条主义的产物，缺乏细微差别和适应性。

作文

In the realm of political and social theory, the term doctrinairism refers to an excessive adherence to a particular doctrine or ideology, often disregarding practical considerations or alternative viewpoints. This concept is particularly relevant in discussions about governance, policy-making, and social movements. In many cases, doctrinairism can lead to rigid thinking and an inability to adapt to changing circumstances, which can ultimately hinder progress and innovation.One prominent example of doctrinairism can be seen in the history of communism. Many communist leaders adhered strictly to Marxist principles, often to the detriment of their countries. For instance, in the Soviet Union, Joseph Stalin's rigid interpretation of Marxism-Leninism led to oppressive regimes that stifled dissent and creativity. The focus on ideological purity resulted in policies that were not only ineffective but also harmful to the populace. This illustrates how doctrinairism, when taken to extremes, can create a disconnect between theory and reality.Moreover, doctrinairism is not limited to political ideologies; it can also permeate other areas such as education, religion, and even science. In educational settings, for example, an unwavering commitment to a specific pedagogical approach can prevent educators from exploring new methods that may benefit their students. This kind of inflexibility can stifle creativity and limit the potential for student engagement and learning.In contrast, a more pragmatic approach that embraces flexibility and open-mindedness can lead to more effective outcomes. By being willing to adapt and incorporate new ideas, individuals and organizations can foster an environment that encourages innovation and collaboration. This is especially important in today's rapidly changing world, where the ability to pivot and reassess strategies is crucial for success.The dangers of doctrinairism are evident in various social movements as well. Movements that become too dogmatic in their beliefs risk alienating potential supporters who may share similar goals but differ in their methods or perspectives. For instance, environmental activism has sometimes been criticized for adopting a one-size-fits-all approach that does not account for the diverse needs and situations of different communities. A more inclusive and adaptable strategy could potentially mobilize a broader base of support and lead to more sustainable change.In conclusion, while having a strong belief in a particular doctrine can provide a sense of direction and purpose, it is essential to remain open to new ideas and perspectives. The pitfalls of doctrinairism serve as a reminder that rigidity in thought can lead to stagnation and missed opportunities. Embracing flexibility and fostering dialogue can create a more dynamic and responsive approach to addressing the complex challenges we face in society today. Ultimately, the balance between conviction and adaptability is key to achieving meaningful progress and understanding in an increasingly interconnected world.

在政治和社会理论的领域中，术语doctrinairism指的是过度坚持某一特定教义或意识形态，常常忽视实际考虑或替代观点。这个概念在讨论治理、政策制定和社会运动时尤为相关。在许多情况下，doctrinairism可能导致僵化思维和无法适应变化的局面，这最终可能阻碍进步和创新。一个显著的doctrinairism例子可以在共产主义的历史中看到。许多共产主义领导者严格遵循马克思主义原则，往往对他们的国家造成了损害。例如，在苏联，约瑟夫·斯大林对马克思主义-列宁主义的严格解释导致了压迫性政权，扼杀了异议和创造力。对意识形态纯粹性的关注导致了不仅无效而且有害于民众的政策。这说明了当doctrinairism被推向极端时，会造成理论与现实之间的脱节。此外，doctrinairism并不限于政治意识形态；它还可以渗透到教育、宗教甚至科学等其他领域。例如，在教育环境中，对特定教学方法的坚定承诺可能会阻止教育工作者探索可能使学生受益的新方法。这种不灵活性可能会扼杀创造力，限制学生参与和学习的潜力。相比之下，采用更务实的方法，拥抱灵活性和开放心态可以导致更有效的结果。通过愿意适应并融入新思想，个人和组织可以营造出鼓励创新和合作的环境。在当今快速变化的世界中，能够迅速调整和重新评估策略对于成功至关重要。doctrinairism的危险在各种社会运动中显而易见。过于教条的运动风险将潜在支持者排除在外，这些支持者可能在目标上与其相似，但在方法或视角上有所不同。例如，环境运动有时因采取一种适用于所有人的方法而受到批评，这种方法没有考虑到不同社区的多样需求和情况。更具包容性和适应性的战略可能会动员更广泛的支持基础，并导致更可持续的变化。总之，尽管对特定教义的强烈信仰可以提供方向感和目标感，但保持对新思想和观点的开放态度至关重要。doctrinairism的陷阱提醒我们，思维的僵化可能导致停滞和错失机会。拥抱灵活性并促进对话可以为解决我们今天社会面临的复杂挑战创造更动态和响应的方式。最终，在一个日益互联的世界中，信念与适应性之间的平衡是实现有意义进步和理解的关键。