hardline

简明释义

英[ˈhɑːdlaɪn]美[ˈhɑrdlaɪn]

adj. 强硬的；不妥协的

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.A hardline approach to its neighbour has been the official stance ever since the Cheonan, a Southern military corvette, was torpedoed in March.

自从今年3月份南韩“天安号”护卫舰被鱼类击沉以来它一直就对其邻国采取强硬的姿态。

2.That sounds a lot better than passing round the hat for hardline Hindu nationalist causes, something else that occurs in the diaspora.

那听起来远比另一些发生在海外犹太人中为奉行强硬路线的印度国家事业筹钱有意义得多。

3.On Friday a senior hardline cleric, Ahmed Khatami, lashed out at Britain in a nationally televised sermon.

星期五，强硬派高级牧师艾哈迈德·哈塔米在全国电视布道中抨击英国。

4.A handful of German hotels have accommodated naturists up to now, but the management at Rosengarten plan to take a hardline anti-apparel stance.

虽然截至目前只有一小撮自然主义者住进德国旅馆，但罗森葛登计划的管理群计划采取强硬的反服装立场。

5.In London, concern rose about the steady stream of young Britons finding their way to the tribal areas, often facilitated by hardline Pakistani groups.

在英国，对当地的关心引起了许多年轻英国人想办法进入巴基斯坦部族地区，通常是通过走强硬路线的巴基斯坦组织。

6."Resolutely adhering to one's principled stance is not the same thing as being hardline," he said.

“坚持原则立场同是否强硬是两码事，”他说。

7.Some argue that a ban would play into the hands of those who spread hardline propaganda.

一些人表明禁令将被那些散布强硬路线宣传的人所利用。

8.Brian Faulkner, a hardline Unionist who had become the Prime Minister of N.I. in March 1971, wanted even stronger security measures.

1971年3月，强硬联合派布莱恩·福克纳(BrianFaulkner)成为北爱首相，期望采取更强硬保安措施。

9.He wants Mr Netanyahu to swap his hardline partners for Tzipi Livni's centrist Kadima party.

他希望内塔尼亚胡用齐皮·利夫尼的中间派前进党换掉他的强硬的合作伙伴。

10.The government adopted a hardline 强硬的 approach to deal with the protests.

政府采取了强硬的方式来应对抗议活动。

11.The hardline 强硬的 faction within the organization is resistant to change.

组织内的强硬的派系对变革持抵制态度。

12.His hardline 强硬的 stance on immigration has polarized public opinion.

他在移民问题上的强硬的立场使公众意见出现分歧。

13.During the negotiations, she took a hardline 强硬的 position that frustrated the other side.

在谈判中，她采取了一个强硬的立场，使对方感到沮丧。

14.The party's hardline 强硬的 policies have alienated moderate voters.

该党的强硬的政策使温和派选民感到疏远。

作文

In today's world, political ideologies often shape the way we understand global events. One term that frequently surfaces in discussions about politics is hardline. The word hardline refers to a strict and uncompromising approach to policies and beliefs, particularly in the context of political or ideological stances. This essay explores the implications of hardline positions in various spheres, including international relations, domestic policy, and social movements.To begin with, in international relations, a hardline stance can significantly affect diplomatic negotiations and conflict resolution. For instance, countries that adopt a hardline approach towards their adversaries often refuse to compromise on key issues, leading to prolonged tensions. A notable example is the relationship between North Korea and the United States. Over the years, both nations have experienced periods of hardline rhetoric, which has resulted in stalled negotiations and heightened military posturing. Such behavior not only complicates the resolution of conflicts but also creates an environment of mistrust that hinders cooperation on global challenges such as climate change and terrorism.Furthermore, within domestic politics, hardline policies can polarize public opinion and hinder bipartisan efforts. Politicians who embrace hardline positions on issues like immigration, healthcare, or gun control often alienate those who advocate for more moderate solutions. This polarization can lead to gridlock in legislative bodies, where compromise becomes increasingly difficult. For example, debates surrounding immigration reform in the United States have often been characterized by hardline positions that emphasize border security and strict enforcement over humanitarian considerations. As a result, meaningful reform remains elusive, leaving millions in uncertainty.In addition to politics, social movements can also be influenced by hardline ideologies. Activist groups that adopt a hardline stance may prioritize radical change over gradual reform, sometimes alienating potential allies. While passionate advocacy is essential for driving social change, a hardline approach can lead to divisions within movements, making it challenging to achieve common goals. For instance, within the environmental movement, some factions advocate for immediate and drastic measures to combat climate change, while others support a more gradual transition towards sustainability. The hardline factions may dismiss the latter as insufficient, potentially fracturing the movement and hindering collective action.However, it is important to recognize that hardline positions can also serve a purpose in certain contexts. In situations where fundamental rights are at stake, a hardline approach may be necessary to protect vulnerable populations. For example, activists fighting against systemic racism or gender inequality may adopt hardline tactics to demand justice and accountability. In such cases, the urgency of the cause can justify a more uncompromising stance.In conclusion, the term hardline encapsulates a rigid and uncompromising approach to various issues in politics and social movements. While hardline positions can lead to significant challenges, such as polarization and stalled negotiations, they can also play a crucial role in advocating for justice and fundamental rights. Understanding the implications of hardline ideologies is essential for navigating the complexities of contemporary political and social landscapes. As we engage in discussions about pressing global issues, it is vital to consider the balance between hardline stances and the need for dialogue and compromise.

在当今世界，政治意识形态往往塑造我们对全球事件的理解。一个经常出现在政治讨论中的术语是硬派。这个词硬派指的是对政策和信仰采取严格和不妥协的方法，特别是在政治或意识形态立场的背景下。本文探讨了硬派立场在国际关系、国内政策和社会运动等各个领域的影响。首先，在国际关系中，硬派立场可以显著影响外交谈判和冲突解决。例如，采取硬派方法对待对手的国家往往拒绝在关键问题上妥协，导致长期紧张。一个显著的例子是朝鲜与美国之间的关系。多年来，这两个国家经历了硬派言辞的时期，导致谈判停滞和军事姿态升级。这种行为不仅使冲突的解决变得复杂，还创造了不信任的环境，阻碍了在气候变化和恐怖主义等全球挑战上的合作。此外，在国内政治中，硬派政策可能会导致公众舆论的两极分化，阻碍两党合作。拥抱硬派立场的政治家在移民、医疗保健或枪支管控等问题上往往会疏远那些倡导更温和解决方案的人。这种两极分化可能导致立法机构的僵局，使妥协变得越来越困难。例如，美国关于移民改革的辩论常常以硬派立场为特征，强调边境安全和严格执法，而不是人道考虑。因此，有意义的改革仍然遥不可及，数百万人处于不确定之中。除了政治，社会运动也可能受到硬派意识形态的影响。采取硬派立场的激进团体可能会优先考虑激进变革而非渐进改革，有时会疏远潜在的盟友。虽然热情的倡导对推动社会变革至关重要，但硬派方法可能导致运动内部的分歧，使实现共同目标变得具有挑战性。例如，在环境运动中，一些派别主张立即采取激烈措施应对气候变化，而另一些则支持更渐进的可持续发展过渡。硬派派别可能会将后者视为不足，从而可能破坏运动并阻碍集体行动。然而，重要的是要认识到，在某些背景下，硬派立场也可以发挥作用。在基本权利受到威胁的情况下，硬派方法可能是保护脆弱群体所必需的。例如，争取系统性种族主义或性别不平等的活动家可能会采取硬派战术来要求公正和问责。在这种情况下，事业的紧迫性可以证明采取更不妥协的立场是合理的。总之，术语硬派概括了对各种政治和社会运动问题采取的刚性和不妥协的方法。虽然硬派立场可能导致显著的挑战，例如两极分化和谈判停滞，但它们在倡导正义和基本权利方面也可以发挥关键作用。理解硬派意识形态的影响对于驾驭当代政治和社会格局的复杂性至关重要。在我们参与关于紧迫全球问题的讨论时，考虑硬派立场与对话和妥协之间的平衡至关重要。