champerty

简明释义

英[ˈtʃæmpəti]美[ˈtʃæmpərti]

n. 帮诉

复 数 c h a m p e r t i e s

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.The restriction has its origins in the ancient common law crime and tort of champerty and maintenance.

此限制源于古时普通法罪行及包揽诉讼与维持有关行为乃侵权行为。

2.The restriction has its origins in the ancient common law crime and tort of champerty and maintenance.

此限制源于古时普通法罪行及包揽诉讼与维持有关行为乃侵权行为。

3.Many legal experts warn against champerty due to its potential to exploit vulnerable parties.

许多法律专家警告不要参与champerty，因为它可能会剥削弱势群体。

4.They entered into a contract that bordered on champerty, which made the judges suspicious.

他们签订的合同接近于champerty，这让法官们感到怀疑。

5.In some jurisdictions, champerty is illegal and can lead to serious penalties.

在某些司法管辖区，champerty是非法的，可能会导致严重的处罚。

6.The investor's involvement in the lawsuit raised questions about champerty.

投资者参与诉讼引发了关于champerty的问题。

7.The lawyer was careful not to engage in champerty, as it could jeopardize the case.

律师小心翼翼地避免参与champerty，因为这可能会危及案件。

作文

In the realm of legal terminology, the word champerty refers to an agreement where a third party provides financial support to a litigant in exchange for a share of the proceeds from the lawsuit. Historically, champerty has been viewed with suspicion and often associated with unethical practices, as it can lead to the exploitation of vulnerable individuals who may not have the means to pursue their legal rights. Understanding the implications of champerty is essential for anyone interested in law, finance, or ethics. The origins of champerty can be traced back to medieval England, where it was considered a form of maintenance, which involved supporting a party in a legal dispute without having a legitimate interest in the outcome. This practice was frowned upon because it could encourage frivolous lawsuits and disrupt the judicial process. Over time, laws were enacted to curb champerty, and many jurisdictions have established strict regulations regarding such agreements.In modern times, the concept of champerty has evolved, especially with the rise of litigation funding. Litigation funding involves third-party investors providing capital to plaintiffs in exchange for a percentage of any potential settlement or judgment. While this practice can help individuals who cannot afford legal fees, it also raises ethical questions about the motivations of the investors and the potential for abuse. Critics argue that champerty can lead to conflicts of interest, where the funders prioritize profit over justice.Despite its controversial nature, champerty serves a practical purpose in some cases. For instance, it can empower individuals who have legitimate claims but lack the resources to pursue them. By providing financial backing, litigation funders can level the playing field and allow deserving cases to move forward. However, it is crucial for both litigants and funders to understand the risks involved in such arrangements, as the outcomes can be unpredictable.Moreover, the legality of champerty varies across jurisdictions. In some places, it is entirely legal and regulated, while in others, it may still be considered unlawful. Therefore, individuals engaging in such agreements must be aware of the specific laws governing champerty in their region. Legal counsel is often recommended to navigate these complex waters effectively.In conclusion, the term champerty embodies a complex intersection of law, ethics, and finance. While it can provide necessary support to those in need, it also carries the potential for misuse. As society continues to grapple with the implications of champerty in the context of litigation funding and access to justice, it is vital for all stakeholders to approach this issue with caution and integrity. Understanding the nuances of champerty will not only enhance one's legal knowledge but also contribute to more informed discussions about the fairness and accessibility of the legal system.

在法律术语的领域中，单词champerty指的是一种协议，其中第三方提供财务支持给诉讼方，以换取诉讼结果的一部分。历史上，champerty被视为一种可疑的行为，并且常常与不道德的做法相关，因为它可能导致对脆弱个体的剥削，这些个体可能没有能力追求他们的法律权利。理解champerty的含义对于任何对法律、金融或伦理感兴趣的人来说都是至关重要的。champerty的起源可以追溯到中世纪的英格兰，当时它被视为一种维护形式，即在没有对结果有合法利益的情况下支持一方进行法律争议。这种做法受到谴责，因为它可能鼓励无谓的诉讼并扰乱司法过程。随着时间的推移，法律被制定以遏制champerty，许多司法管辖区建立了关于此类协议的严格规定。在现代，champerty的概念已经发展，特别是在诉讼融资的兴起下。诉讼融资涉及第三方投资者向原告提供资金，以换取任何潜在和解或判决的一定比例。虽然这一做法可以帮助那些无法负担法律费用的个人，但它也引发了关于投资者动机和潜在滥用的伦理问题。批评者认为，champerty可能导致利益冲突，融资方优先考虑利润而非公正。尽管其争议性，champerty在某些情况下确实具有实际意义。例如，它可以赋予那些拥有合法索赔但缺乏资源去追求的个人权力。通过提供财务支持，诉讼资助者可以平衡局势，使应得的案件得以推进。然而，诉讼人和资助者都必须了解这种安排所涉及的风险，因为结果可能不可预测。此外，champerty的合法性因司法管辖区而异。在某些地方，它是完全合法并受到监管的，而在其他地方，它可能仍被视为非法。因此，参与此类协议的个人必须了解其所在地区关于champerty的具体法律。通常建议寻求法律顾问，以有效地导航这些复杂的水域。总之，术语champerty体现了法律、伦理和金融的复杂交集。虽然它可以为需要帮助的人提供必要的支持，但它也带来了滥用的潜力。随着社会继续努力应对champerty在诉讼融资和公正获取方面的影响，所有利益相关者都必须谨慎和诚信地看待这一问题。理解champerty的细微差别不仅会增强一个人的法律知识，还将有助于更全面地讨论法律系统的公平性和可及性。