reactionist

简明释义

英[rɪˈækʃənɪst]美[rɪˈækʃnɪst]

n. 反动分子；保守论者

adj. 反动的

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Later, Reactionist writers took the view that frontier women were lonely, displaced persons in a hostile milieu that intensified the worst aspects of gender relations.

后来，反动派作家认为，在敌对的环境中，边境妇女是孤独的、流离失所的人，这加剧了两性关系中最恶劣的方面。

2.Later, Reactionist writers took the view that frontier women were lonely, displaced persons in a hostile milieu that intensified the worst aspects of gender relations.

后来，反动派作家认为，在敌对的环境中，边境妇女是孤独的、流离失所的人，这加剧了两性关系中最恶劣的方面。

3.In the debate, one speaker identified himself as a reactionist 反动主义者 who opposed all forms of progressive change.

在辩论中，一位发言者自称为反动主义者，反对所有形式的进步变化。

4.The reactionist 反动主义者 movements often arise during times of social upheaval.

在社会动荡时期，反动主义者运动常常出现。

5.The reactionist 反动主义者 ideology often seeks to return to traditional values.

反动主义者意识形态通常寻求回归传统价值观。

6.The government's policies were criticized by many as being too reactionist 反动主义者 in nature.

许多人批评政府的政策本质上过于反动主义者。

7.Many historians label the policies of that era as reactionist 反动主义者 due to their restrictive nature.

许多历史学家将那个时代的政策标记为反动主义者，因为它们具有限制性。

作文

In today's rapidly changing world, individuals and groups often respond to new ideas, technologies, and social movements in various ways. Some embrace these changes, while others resist them. Among those who resist change, we find a particular group known as reactionists. A reactionist is someone who opposes progress or reform and seeks to maintain the status quo. This term often carries a negative connotation, implying that such individuals are unwilling to adapt or evolve with society. The term reactionist can be applied to various contexts, including politics, culture, and social issues. For example, in political discourse, a reactionist may oppose progressive policies aimed at addressing climate change, advocating instead for traditional energy sources and practices. This resistance can stem from a belief that the changes proposed threaten their way of life or economic interests. Similarly, in cultural discussions, a reactionist might resist shifts in societal norms regarding gender roles or racial equality, clinging to outdated beliefs that they perceive as being under threat. Understanding the mindset of a reactionist requires delving into the fears and motivations that drive their opposition to change. Often, these individuals feel a sense of loss or disorientation in the face of rapid transformation. They may believe that the past held values and principles that are worth preserving, viewing contemporary changes as a dilution of those core tenets. This perspective can create a strong emotional response, leading to a desire to fight against what they see as an encroachment on their identity or community. However, it is crucial to recognize that not all resistance to change is inherently negative. In some cases, questioning the direction of progress can lead to important discussions about ethics, sustainability, and the implications of new technologies. A reactionist may serve as a counterbalance to more radical changes, prompting society to consider the potential consequences of its actions. For instance, debates surrounding artificial intelligence and its impact on employment have seen both proponents of innovation and reactionists voicing their opinions. The concerns raised by reactionists can lead to more thoughtful approaches to integrating new technologies into our lives. Despite this potential for constructive dialogue, the challenge remains in how reactionists engage with others. Often, their approach can be combative, leading to polarization and conflict rather than collaboration. This is particularly evident in the current political climate, where reactionists may align themselves with populist movements that reject established institutions and expertise. Such dynamics can hinder progress and create an environment where compromise becomes increasingly difficult. In conclusion, while the term reactionist typically describes those who resist change, it is essential to understand the underlying motivations and fears that drive this behavior. By fostering open dialogues and encouraging empathy, society can bridge the gap between progress and preservation. Recognizing the value of diverse perspectives, including those of reactionists, can ultimately lead to a more balanced and inclusive approach to navigating the complexities of change. As we move forward, it is vital to remember that progress does not have to come at the expense of understanding and respecting the past. Only through collaboration can we create a future that honors both innovation and tradition.

在当今快速变化的世界中，个人和群体往往以不同的方式回应新思想、新技术和社会运动。有些人拥抱这些变化，而另一些人则抵制它们。在那些抵制变革的人中，我们发现一个特定的群体，称为反动派。反动派是指反对进步或改革并寻求维持现状的人。这个词通常带有负面含义，暗示这些人不愿意适应或与社会共同发展。

“反动派”这个词可以应用于各种背景，包括政治、文化和社会问题。例如，在政治话语中，反动派可能会反对旨在应对气候变化的进步政策，而主张传统的能源来源和做法。这种抵制可能源于一种信念，即所提出的变化威胁到他们的生活方式或经济利益。同样，在文化讨论中，反动派可能会抵制关于性别角色或种族平等的社会规范的转变，紧紧抓住他们认为受到威胁的过时信仰。

理解反动派的心态需要深入探讨推动他们反对变化的恐惧和动机。通常，这些人在快速转型面前感到失落或迷茫。他们可能认为过去拥有值得保留的价值观和原则，将当代的变化视为对这些核心信念的稀释。这种观点会产生强烈的情感反应，导致他们渴望与他们所看到的对身份或社区的侵蚀作斗争。

然而，至关重要的是要认识到，并非所有对变化的抵制都是固有的负面。在某些情况下，对进步方向的质疑可以引发有关伦理、可持续性和新技术影响的重要讨论。反动派可能作为更激进变化的制衡，促使社会考虑其行动的潜在后果。例如，围绕人工智能及其对就业影响的辩论中，既有创新的支持者，也有反动派表达了他们的观点。反动派提出的担忧可以导致我们对新技术融入生活的更深思熟虑的方法。

尽管这种建设性对话的潜力存在，但挑战仍然在于反动派如何与他人互动。通常，他们的方式可能是对抗性的，导致极化和冲突，而不是合作。这在当前的政治气候中尤其明显，反动派可能会与拒绝既定机构和专业知识的民粹主义运动结盟。这种动态可能妨碍进步，并创造一个妨碍妥协的环境。

总之，虽然术语反动派通常描述那些抵制变化的人，但理解驱动这种行为的潜在动机和恐惧至关重要。通过促进开放的对话和鼓励共情，社会可以弥合进步与保护之间的鸿沟。认识到包括反动派在内的多元视角的价值，最终可以导致在应对变化复杂性时采取更平衡和包容的方法。随着我们向前迈进，重要的是要记住，进步并不一定要以牺牲理解和尊重过去为代价。只有通过合作，我们才能创造一个既尊重创新又尊重传统的未来。