spoilsman

简明释义

英[ˈspɔɪlzˌmæn]美[ˈspɔɪlzˌmæn]

n. 分肥者；以获益为目的而支持政党者

复 数 s p o i l s m e n

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Every successful project needs a dedicated spoilsman to handle the benefits.

每个成功的项目都需要一位专门的spoilsman来处理收益。

2.The spoilsman's role is crucial in ensuring fairness in the allocation of resources.

这位spoilsman的角色对于确保资源分配的公平性至关重要。

3.The team appointed a new spoilsman to manage the distribution of rewards after their victory.

团队任命了一位新的spoilsman来管理胜利后的奖励分配。

4.As a seasoned spoilsman, he knew how to negotiate the best deals for his clients.

作为一名经验丰富的spoilsman，他知道如何为客户谈判最佳交易。

5.During the meeting, the spoilsman outlined the criteria for reward eligibility.

在会议上，这位spoilsman概述了奖励资格的标准。

作文

In the realm of politics and governance, the term spoilsman refers to an individual who benefits from the spoils of victory, particularly in the context of political appointments and patronage. This concept has deep roots in the history of democratic systems, where winning parties often reward their supporters with positions of power and influence. The practice can be traced back to the early days of American politics, where the phrase 'to the victor belong the spoils' became a rallying cry for those advocating for the distribution of government jobs to loyal party members. A spoilsman is typically seen as someone who prioritizes personal gain over public service. This approach can lead to a culture of favoritism and corruption, undermining the integrity of governmental institutions. For instance, when a political party wins an election, the newly elected officials may appoint friends, family, or loyal supporters to key positions, regardless of their qualifications. This not only diminishes the quality of governance but also alienates skilled professionals who may not share the same political allegiance. The implications of having a spoilsman in power can be far-reaching. When decisions are made based on personal connections rather than merit, it can result in inefficiencies and a lack of accountability. Citizens may become disillusioned with the political process, feeling that their voices are not heard and that their needs are secondary to the interests of those in power. This disconnection can foster a sense of apathy among the electorate, leading to lower voter turnout and engagement in civic duties. Moreover, the presence of a spoilsman can perpetuate systemic inequality. Individuals from marginalized communities may find themselves at a disadvantage in the political landscape, as they may lack the networks and relationships that are often necessary to secure positions of influence. This can create a cycle of exclusion, where only those with connections to the ruling party have access to opportunities and resources. To combat the negative effects of spoilsman practices, many countries have implemented reforms aimed at promoting merit-based hiring and reducing nepotism in government. These measures often include the establishment of independent commissions to oversee appointments and ensure that candidates are selected based on their qualifications and experience rather than their political affiliations. Such reforms are essential for restoring public trust in the political system and ensuring that government serves the interests of all citizens, not just a select few. In conclusion, while the role of a spoilsman may seem entrenched in the fabric of political life, it is crucial for societies to strive towards more equitable and transparent governance. By recognizing the detrimental impact of patronage and favoritism, we can work towards a political environment where meritocracy prevails, and the focus shifts from personal gain to the greater good. Ultimately, the health of a democracy relies on the ability of its leaders to prioritize the needs of their constituents over their own ambitions. Only then can we hope to see a flourishing society that values integrity, accountability, and inclusivity.

在政治和治理的领域中，术语spoilsman指的是一个从胜利的战利品中获益的个人，特别是在政治任命和恩赐的背景下。这个概念在民主制度的历史中有着深厚的根基，胜利的政党往往会用政府职位和影响力来奖励他们的支持者。这一做法可以追溯到美国政治的早期，当时“胜利者应得战利品”这句话成为倡导将政府工作分配给忠诚党派成员的人的口号。一个spoilsman通常被视为一个优先考虑个人利益而非公共服务的人。这种做法可能导致偏袒和腐败的文化，破坏政府机构的完整性。例如，当一个政党赢得选举时，新当选的官员可能会任命朋友、家人或忠实支持者担任关键职位，而不考虑他们的资格。这不仅降低了治理的质量，还使那些可能没有相同政治立场的专业人士感到疏远。拥有spoilsman的权力，其影响可能是深远的。当决策基于个人关系而不是能力时，这可能导致低效率和缺乏问责制。公民可能会对政治过程感到失望，觉得他们的声音没有被听到，他们的需求次于掌权者的利益。这种脱节可能会在选民中造成冷漠感，导致投票率和公民责任的降低。此外，spoilsman的存在可能会延续系统性的不平等。来自边缘化社区的个人在政治舞台上可能处于不利地位，因为他们可能缺乏获得影响力职位所需的网络和关系。这可能造成排斥的循环，只有与执政党有联系的人才能获得机会和资源。为了应对spoilsman做法的负面影响，许多国家实施了旨在促进基于能力的招聘和减少政府中的裙带关系的改革。这些措施通常包括建立独立委员会来监督任命，确保候选人根据其资格和经验而非政治关系被选中。这些改革对于恢复公众对政治体系的信任至关重要，并确保政府服务于所有公民的利益，而不仅仅是少数人。总之，尽管spoilsman的角色在政治生活中似乎根深蒂固，但社会必须努力实现更加公平和透明的治理。通过认识到恩赐和偏袒的有害影响，我们可以朝着一个以能力为基础的政治环境迈进，关注点从个人利益转向更大的利益。最终，一个民主制度的健康依赖于其领导者将选民的需求置于自身野心之上的能力。只有这样，我们才能希望看到一个重视诚信、问责和包容的繁荣社会。