technocracy
简明释义
n. 专家管理；专家政治论，技术统治论
复 数 t e c h n o c r a c i e s
英英释义
单词用法
技术官僚运动 | |
技术官僚治理 | |
技术官僚制的兴起 | |
实施技术官僚制 | |
倡导技术官僚制 | |
对技术官僚制的批评 |
同义词
反义词
例句
1.Through analyzing the choices made by enterprises in face of crises, the paper introduces technocracy in the theory of human capital.
通过解释企业危机时的选择，介绍了人力资本论中的技术性质决定论。
2.Technocracy, the: the modern organization and conspiracy dedicated to furthering a scientific and rational basis for the world.
科技联盟：致力于让世界更为科学化与理性化的现代秘密组织。
3.Others despair of national politicians and hope foreigners will offer salvation via technocracy.
另一些人对国家政客感到绝望，希望外国人能够通过技术统治来拯救他们。
4.He argues that we must abandon the extreme faith in technocracy.
他认为，我们必须放弃对技术统治论的信仰。
5.This paper briefly discusses the definition, history, characteristics, and existent reasons of technocracy.
技治主义的定义、历史、特征、存在理由。
6.In Daniel Bell's mind, Taylor is perhaps the most important person applying the theory of "technocracy" to the actual industrial practice.
丹尼尔·贝尔认为泰罗是将科技治国论方式用于实际的工业实践方面也许最重要的人物。
7.In Daniel Bell's mind, Taylor is perhaps the most important person applying the theory of "technocracy" to the actual industrial practice.
丹尼尔·贝尔认为泰罗是将科技治国论方式用于实际的工业实践方面也许最重要的人物。
8.The Traditions fight to preserve magic against the Technocracy, and to defend against the depredations of Marauders and Nephandi.
传统宗派对抗科技联盟以保护魔法，也为防范劫夺者与灭世者的掠夺而战。
9.West Technocracy, an important social thought, claims that experts should govern society totally.
专家治国论是西方一种重要的社会思潮，它主张技术专家全面管理社会。
10.Critics argue that a technocracy could lead to a lack of democratic accountability.
批评者认为，技术官僚制度可能导致缺乏民主问责制。
11.In a technocracy, policies are driven by data and analysis rather than public opinion.
在技术官僚制度中，政策是由数据和分析驱动的，而不是公众舆论。
12.In a true technocracy, experts would govern based on their knowledge and skills rather than political affiliations.
在一个真正的技术官僚制度中，专家将根据他们的知识和技能进行治理，而不是基于政治关系。
13.Many believe that our current government is moving towards a technocracy, where decisions are made by scientists and engineers.
许多人认为，我们当前的政府正在朝着技术官僚制度发展，决策由科学家和工程师来做。
14.The concept of technocracy emerged in the early 20th century as a response to industrialization.
在20世纪初，技术官僚制度的概念作为对工业化的回应而出现。
作文
In the modern world, the concept of governance has evolved significantly, leading to various systems that aim to improve efficiency and effectiveness in decision-making. One such system is technocracy, which refers to a form of governance where decision-makers are selected based on their technical expertise and knowledge rather than political affiliations or popular vote. The idea behind technocracy is that complex societal issues require specialized knowledge to solve, and therefore, those who understand the intricacies of technology and science should be at the helm of leadership. Historically, the term technocracy gained traction during the early 20th century, particularly during the Great Depression, when traditional political systems were perceived as ineffective in addressing economic crises. Proponents of technocracy argued that engineers, scientists, and other experts could better manage resources and implement policies based on empirical data and technological advancements. This perspective highlights the importance of rationality and efficiency in governance, contrasting sharply with the often chaotic nature of democratic politics, where decisions can be swayed by public opinion or partisanship.The rise of technocracy has been facilitated by rapid technological advancements and the increasing complexity of global challenges, such as climate change, public health crises, and economic inequality. In an era where information is abundant and the pace of change is relentless, many believe that having leaders who are well-versed in technology and science can lead to more informed and effective policies. For instance, during the COVID-19 pandemic, many countries turned to health experts and scientists to guide their responses, demonstrating a temporary shift towards a more technocratic approach in crisis management.However, the implementation of technocracy is not without its criticisms. Detractors argue that it can lead to a disconnect between leaders and the general populace, as experts may become insulated from the everyday experiences and needs of citizens. Furthermore, there is a concern that prioritizing technical knowledge over democratic processes could undermine accountability and transparency in governance. When decisions are made solely by a select group of experts, there is a risk of elitism, where the voices of ordinary people are marginalized.Moreover, the reliance on technology and data can sometimes overlook the ethical implications of certain decisions. For example, while data-driven approaches can optimize resource allocation, they may also lead to dehumanization if individuals are viewed merely as statistics rather than as unique human beings with diverse needs and experiences. This raises important questions about the balance between expertise and empathy in governance.In conclusion, technocracy presents both opportunities and challenges in the realm of governance. As societies continue to grapple with complex issues, the integration of technical expertise into decision-making processes may enhance efficiency and effectiveness. However, it is crucial to ensure that this does not come at the expense of democratic values and the inclusion of diverse perspectives. Ultimately, the most effective governance may lie in finding a harmonious balance between technocracy and democratic principles, ensuring that leaders are both knowledgeable and attuned to the needs of the people they serve.
在现代世界，治理的概念已经发生了显著变化，导致了各种旨在提高决策效率和有效性的制度。其中一种制度是技术官僚制，指的是一种治理形式，其中决策者是根据他们的技术专长和知识而不是政治关系或民众投票来选拔的。技术官僚制背后的理念是，复杂的社会问题需要专业知识来解决，因此，理解技术和科学复杂性的人应该掌握领导权。历史上，技术官僚制这个词在20世纪初获得了关注，特别是在大萧条期间，当时传统政治体系被认为在应对经济危机方面无效。技术官僚制的支持者认为，工程师、科学家和其他专家可以更好地管理资源并基于实证数据和技术进步实施政策。这一观点强调了理性和效率在治理中的重要性，与民主政治中常常混乱的性质形成鲜明对比，民主政治中，决策可能会受到公众舆论或党派的影响。随着技术的快速发展和全球挑战的日益复杂，如气候变化、公共卫生危机和经济不平等，技术官僚制的兴起得到了促进。在信息丰富且变化迅速的时代，许多人相信，拥有精通技术和科学的领导者可以导致更明智和有效的政策。例如，在COVID-19大流行期间，许多国家转向健康专家和科学家以指导其反应，展示了在危机管理中向更加技术官僚制的方法的暂时转变。然而，技术官僚制的实施并非没有批评者。反对者认为，这可能导致领导者与普通民众之间的脱节，因为专家可能会与公民的日常经历和需求隔离。此外，还有人担心，优先考虑技术知识而非民主程序可能会削弱治理的问责制和透明度。当决策完全由一小群专家做出时，存在精英主义的风险，普通人的声音可能会被边缘化。此外，依赖技术和数据有时会忽视某些决策的伦理影响。例如，尽管基于数据的方法可以优化资源分配，但如果个体仅被视为统计数据而不是独特的人，可能会导致非人性化。这提出了关于在治理中平衡专业知识和同情心的重要问题。总之，技术官僚制在治理领域提供了机遇和挑战。随着社会继续应对复杂问题，将技术专长融入决策过程可能会增强效率和有效性。然而，确保这不会以牺牲民主价值观和包容多元观点为代价至关重要。最终，最有效的治理可能在于找到技术官僚制与民主原则之间的和谐平衡，确保领导者既具备知识又能关注他们所服务人民的需求。
