unenlightening

简明释义

英[ˌʌnɪnˈlaɪtənɪŋ]美[ˌʌnɪnˈlaɪtənɪŋ]

adj. 无启发作用的

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.The subject discourse in the law interpretation possesses characteristics of intercourse, of time limit, of rule, of procedure, of unenlightening and of the decision by the law text.

法律解释中的主体话语具有交往性、时限性、规则性、程序性、封闭性以及法律文本的决定性等特点。

2.The subject discourse in the law interpretation possesses characteristics of intercourse, of time limit, of rule, of procedure, of unenlightening and of the decision by the law text.

法律解释中的主体话语具有交往性、时限性、规则性、程序性、封闭性以及法律文本的决定性等特点。

3.The meeting turned out to be unenlightening, with no new ideas presented.

会议结果是无启发性的，没有提出任何新想法。

4.His explanations were unenlightening, making it hard for anyone to grasp the concept.

他的解释是无启发性的，让任何人都很难掌握这个概念。

5.I expected more from the documentary, but it was ultimately unenlightening.

我对这部纪录片抱有更高期望，但最终它是无启发性的。

6.The lecture was rather unenlightening, leaving the students confused about the topic.

这场讲座相当无启发性，让学生对主题感到困惑。

7.After reading the report, I found it to be quite unenlightening and lacking in useful information.

读完报告后，我发现它相当无启发性，缺乏有用的信息。

作文

In today's fast-paced world, where information is readily available at our fingertips, it is crucial to discern between enlightening and unenlightening content. The digital age has brought about an overwhelming amount of data, articles, videos, and social media posts that claim to inform or educate us. However, not all of this content fulfills its promise. In fact, much of it can be classified as unenlightening, which means it fails to provide valuable insights or knowledge. This phenomenon raises important questions about the quality of information we consume and its impact on our understanding of various subjects.To illustrate this point, let’s consider the realm of news media. With the rise of sensationalism, many news outlets prioritize clickbait headlines over in-depth analysis. As a result, viewers are often bombarded with stories that are designed to provoke emotional reactions rather than to enlighten them about significant issues. Such reporting can be described as unenlightening because it does not foster a deeper understanding of current events; instead, it perpetuates confusion and misinformation.Moreover, social media platforms have become breeding grounds for unenlightening content. Users frequently share memes, quotes, and snippets of information without verifying their accuracy or context. This trend can lead to the spread of false narratives and shallow discussions that lack substance. When people engage with such content, they may feel informed, but in reality, they are only skimming the surface of complex topics. This superficial engagement can hinder critical thinking and prevent individuals from seeking out more comprehensive and enlightening resources.In contrast, enlightening content encourages curiosity and promotes a deeper exploration of ideas. For instance, well-researched articles, documentaries, and educational podcasts can challenge our perspectives and stimulate thoughtful discussions. These forms of media require time and effort to consume, but they ultimately enrich our understanding of the world around us. When we engage with enlightening material, we are more likely to develop informed opinions and make better decisions.Furthermore, the distinction between enlightening and unenlightening content is particularly relevant in academic settings. Students are often inundated with information from textbooks, online resources, and lectures. It is essential for educators to guide students toward sources that not only convey facts but also encourage critical thinking and analysis. If students rely solely on unenlightening materials, they may struggle to grasp complex concepts or develop the analytical skills necessary for success in their studies and future careers.In conclusion, the abundance of information in our modern world necessitates a discerning approach to content consumption. While it is easy to get lost in the sea of data, we must strive to identify and prioritize enlightening resources that contribute to our growth and understanding. By doing so, we can avoid the pitfalls of unenlightening content that clouds our judgment and limits our potential. Ultimately, the choice between enlightenment and unenlightening information lies in our hands, and it is our responsibility to seek out knowledge that truly enriches our lives.

在当今快节奏的世界中，信息触手可及，辨别启发性内容与无启发性内容至关重要。数字时代带来了大量的数据、文章、视频和社交媒体帖子，这些内容声称要告知或教育我们。然而，并非所有内容都能兑现其承诺。事实上，其中很多内容可以被归类为无启发性，这意味着它未能提供有价值的见解或知识。这种现象引发了关于我们消费信息的质量及其对我们理解各种主题影响的重要问题。为了说明这一点，让我们考虑新闻媒体的领域。随着耸人听闻的报道的兴起，许多新闻机构优先考虑点击诱饵标题而非深入分析。因此，观众常常被轰炸以激发情感反应而非启发他们对重大问题的理解的故事。这种报道可以被描述为无启发性，因为它并没有促进对时事的更深理解；相反，它延续了混淆和错误信息。此外，社交媒体平台已成为无启发性内容的滋生地。用户经常分享表情包、名言和信息片段，而不验证其准确性或上下文。这一趋势可能导致虚假叙事和缺乏实质的肤浅讨论的传播。当人们接触此类内容时，他们可能会觉得自己得到了信息，但实际上，他们只是略微触及了复杂主题的表面。这种肤浅的参与可能会阻碍批判性思维，防止个人寻求更全面和启发性的资源。相比之下，启发性内容鼓励好奇心，促进对思想的更深入探索。例如，经过充分研究的文章、纪录片和教育播客可以挑战我们的观点，刺激深思熟虑的讨论。这些媒体形式需要时间和精力来消费，但最终丰富了我们对周围世界的理解。当我们接触启发性材料时，我们更有可能形成有根据的观点并做出更好的决策。此外，启发性和无启发性内容之间的区别在学术环境中尤为相关。学生们常常被教科书、在线资源和讲座的信息淹没。教育工作者必须引导学生选择不仅传达事实而且鼓励批判性思维和分析的来源。如果学生仅依赖于无启发性材料，他们可能会难以掌握复杂概念或发展成功所需的分析技能。总之，在我们现代世界中信息的丰富性要求我们对内容消费采取一种挑剔的态度。虽然在数据的海洋中迷失是很容易的，但我们必须努力识别和优先考虑那些有助于我们成长和理解的启发性资源。通过这样做，我们可以避免无启发性内容的陷阱，这些内容模糊了我们的判断，限制了我们的潜力。最终，启发和无启发性信息之间的选择掌握在我们手中，而寻求真正丰富我们生活的知识是我们的责任。