patentability

简明释义

英[ˌpætəntəˈbɪlɪti]美[ˌpætəntəˈbɪləti]

n. [专利] 专利性；可专利性；专利要件

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Since 1998, the main countries all over the world gradually reached an agreement on the patentability of E-business method. However, they set different criteria for the judgment of non-obviousness.

1998年以来，世界各主要国家对于电子商务商业方法的可专利性逐渐达成共识，但在实施何种创造性判断标准方面却各行其是。

2.Since 1998, the main countries all over the world gradually reached an agreement on the patentability of E-business method. However, they set different criteria for the judgment of non-obviousness.

1998年以来，世界各主要国家对于电子商务商业方法的可专利性逐渐达成共识，但在实施何种创造性判断标准方面却各行其是。

3.Often, the grounds are a sub-set of the requirements for patentability in the relevant country.

通常情况下，理由是一个子集的要求申请专利的有关国家。

4.He said that although gene patents had been issued for decades, the patentability of genes had never been examined in court.

他说虽然基因专利已经被颁发了几十年，但是基因的可专利性从未在法庭上检验过。

5.In our country, the research to the patentability of computer software is in the start stage yet.

在我国，对于计算机软件的可专利性研究还处于起步阶段。

6.Is there a duty to disclose material information relating to patentability to the SIPO? What are the consequences for not disclosing any material information known to the applicant?

申请人有无义务提交其知晓的与发明专利申请密切相关的资料？不提交有何后果？

7.Another way is by proving that the patent is invalid because it fails to meet the criteria for patentability.

另一种方式是证明专利由于未能满足专利性的标准而无效。

8.The publication of a patent application is not an indication of the patentability of the invention in any way. It only means that the application is 18 months old.

任何情况下，一个专利申请的公布并不代表此发明完全具有可获得专利的性质，这只表示该申请已达18个月之久。

9.Before filing a patent application, it's crucial to assess the patentability 专利性 of your invention.

在提交专利申请之前，评估你发明的专利性是至关重要的。

10.The company hired experts to evaluate the patentability 专利性 of their innovative designs.

公司雇佣专家评估其创新设计的专利性。

11.The lawyer explained the criteria for patentability 专利性 to the inventors during the meeting.

律师在会议上向发明者解释了专利性的标准。

12.Certain types of software may face challenges regarding their patentability 专利性 in various jurisdictions.

某些类型的软件在不同法域可能面临其专利性的问题。

13.The research team conducted a study to determine the patentability 专利性 of their new technology.

研究团队进行了研究，以确定他们新技术的专利性。

作文

In today's rapidly advancing technological landscape, the concept of patentability plays a crucial role in fostering innovation and protecting intellectual property. Patentability refers to the legal criteria that an invention must meet in order to be eligible for a patent. This includes requirements such as novelty, non-obviousness, and usefulness. Understanding these criteria is essential for inventors and businesses alike, as it determines whether their creations can be legally protected from unauthorized use or reproduction.First and foremost, the requirement of novelty is fundamental to patentability. An invention must be new and not previously disclosed to the public. This means that if an invention has been publicly known or used before the patent application is filed, it fails to meet this criterion. For example, if a researcher develops a new type of solar panel but finds that a similar design was published in a scientific journal prior to their application, the invention would lack novelty, thereby jeopardizing its patentability.Secondly, non-obviousness is another critical factor in determining patentability. An invention must not only be novel but also sufficiently inventive, meaning it should not be obvious to someone with ordinary skill in the relevant field. This criterion ensures that patents are granted only for inventions that represent a significant advancement over existing knowledge. For instance, if a company creates a new software algorithm that merely combines two existing algorithms without any innovative approach, it may be deemed obvious and thus not patentable.The third requirement, usefulness, mandates that an invention must have a practical application or utility. This means that the invention should provide some identifiable benefit or be capable of being used in some way. For example, a theoretical concept that has no real-world application would fail the usefulness test, resulting in the denial of patentability.Additionally, the process of obtaining a patent involves a thorough examination by a patent office, where the application is scrutinized against these criteria. This examination process is crucial in maintaining the integrity of the patent system, as it ensures that only truly innovative and useful inventions receive protection. However, the complexity of the patentability criteria can sometimes lead to disputes and challenges, especially when it comes to determining what constitutes novelty or non-obviousness.Moreover, the implications of patentability extend beyond individual inventors to the broader economy. By providing a framework for protecting innovations, patents encourage investment in research and development. Companies are more likely to invest in new technologies when they know that their inventions can be safeguarded against competitors. This, in turn, drives economic growth and technological progress.In conclusion, understanding patentability is vital for anyone involved in the innovation ecosystem. The criteria of novelty, non-obviousness, and usefulness serve as the foundation for the patent system, ensuring that only deserving inventions receive legal protection. As technology continues to evolve, the importance of patentability will remain significant in promoting creativity and safeguarding intellectual property rights. Without a clear understanding of these principles, inventors risk losing their hard-earned innovations to infringement and competition, ultimately stifling the very innovation that patents aim to protect.

在当今快速发展的技术环境中，专利性的概念在促进创新和保护知识产权方面发挥着至关重要的作用。专利性是指发明必须满足的法律标准，以便有资格获得专利。这包括新颖性、非显而易见性和实用性等要求。理解这些标准对于发明者和企业来说至关重要，因为它决定了他们的创造是否可以合法地保护，免受未经授权的使用或复制。首先，新颖性的要求是专利性的基础。发明必须是新的，并且未曾向公众披露。这意味着，如果一项发明在申请专利之前已经为公众所知或使用，则它未能满足这一标准。例如，如果研究人员开发了一种新型太阳能电池板，但发现类似的设计在其申请之前已在科学期刊上发表，则该发明将缺乏新颖性，从而危及其专利性。其次，非显而易见性是确定专利性的另一个关键因素。发明不仅必须是新颖的，而且还必须具有足够的创造性，这意味着对相关领域的普通技术人员来说不应显而易见。此标准确保只有那些代表现有知识重大进展的发明才会获得专利。例如，如果一家公司创建了一个新的软件算法，仅仅是将两个现有算法组合在一起，而没有任何创新的方法，那么它可能会被认为是显而易见的，从而无法获得专利。第三个要求是实用性，要求发明必须具有实际应用或效用。这意味着发明应该提供某种可识别的好处或能够以某种方式使用。例如，一个没有现实应用的理论概念将未能通过实用性测试，从而导致专利性的拒绝。此外，获得专利的过程涉及专利局的全面审查，在此过程中，申请将根据这些标准进行审查。这个审查过程对于维护专利制度的完整性至关重要，因为它确保只有真正创新和有用的发明才能获得保护。然而，专利性标准的复杂性有时会导致争议和挑战，特别是在确定什么构成新颖性或非显而易见性时。此外，专利性的影响超越了个别发明者，对更广泛的经济也有影响。通过提供保护创新的框架，专利鼓励对研究和开发的投资。当公司知道他们的发明可以得到保护时，他们更有可能投资于新技术。这反过来又推动了经济增长和技术进步。总之，理解专利性对于任何参与创新生态系统的人来说都是至关重要的。新颖性、非显而易见性和实用性的标准构成了专利制度的基础，确保只有应得的发明才能获得法律保护。随着技术的不断发展，专利性的重要性在促进创造力和保护知识产权方面将始终显著。如果没有对这些原则的清晰理解，发明者可能会面临其辛苦获得的创新被侵权和竞争对手抢走的风险，最终抑制专利旨在保护的创新。