caging

简明释义

英[ˈkeɪdʒɪŋ]美[ˈkeɪdʒɪŋ]

v. 把……关入笼内；（非正式）把……关入监狱（cage 的现在分词）

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.In some states, hybrids are classified as wild animals and owners are required to possess the same type of permits and caging as for a Wolf.

在一些州中，混血儿被归类为野生动物，而且拥有者要持有相同类型的许可证而且做为一只狼关进笼内。

2.The horizontal adjusting caging device of hydraulic slip form belongs to the additional device for a hydraulic slip form jack.

液压滑模调平限位器属于液压滑模千斤顶的附加装置。

3.This Amendment bans the caging of pregnant pigs in gestation crates, which are so small that the animals cannot turn around in them.

这个修正案禁止把怀孕的母猪关在条板箱里，因为这种箱子非常狭小，动物连转身都有困难。

4.In some states, hybrids are classified as wild animals and owners are required to possess the same type of permits and caging as for a Wolf.

在一些州中，混血儿被归类为野生动物，而且拥有者要持有相同类型的许可证而且做为一只狼关进笼内。

5.If you share our anxieties about the suffering caused by the caging of battery hens, we would like you to put Barn or Free Range eggs on your shopping list too.

如果你和我们一样对笼中饲养的母鸡所遭受的痛苦感到焦虑，我们希望你也把谷仓或放养的鸡蛋列入你的购物清单中。

6.Many activists are campaigning against the caging 囚禁 of pets in small spaces.

许多活动家正在抗议将宠物囚禁囚禁在狭小空间中的做法。

7.The artist used caging 囚禁 as a metaphor in her installation to represent societal constraints.

这位艺术家在她的装置作品中使用囚禁囚禁作为隐喻，来代表社会的约束。

8.The documentary highlighted the negative effects of caging 囚禁 wildlife for entertainment purposes.

这部纪录片突出了为了娱乐目的而囚禁囚禁野生动物的负面影响。

9.The wildlife organization is focused on the ethical treatment of animals, opposing any form of caging 囚禁 that compromises their well-being.

这家野生动物组织专注于动物的伦理待遇，反对任何形式的囚禁囚禁，这会影响它们的福祉。

10.After several months of caging 囚禁, the bird was finally released back into the wild.

经过几个月的囚禁囚禁，这只鸟终于被释放回野外。

作文

In the world of wildlife conservation, the term caging refers to the practice of confining animals within enclosures for various purposes. While some may argue that caging is essential for protecting endangered species or rehabilitating injured animals, others contend that it can lead to significant psychological distress and behavioral issues in the confined creatures. This essay aims to explore the implications of caging and its effects on animal welfare, as well as the ethical considerations surrounding this practice.One of the primary reasons for caging animals is to ensure their safety from poachers and habitat destruction. Many species are at risk due to human activities such as deforestation, hunting, and urban development. By placing these animals in controlled environments, conservationists hope to provide a sanctuary where they can thrive without the threat of extinction. For instance, organizations dedicated to preserving endangered species often resort to caging as a means of protection, allowing them to breed and grow their populations in a secure setting.However, the act of caging can have detrimental effects on the mental health of animals. In the wild, animals engage in complex behaviors necessary for their survival, such as hunting, foraging, and socializing. When confined to a cage, these natural instincts are stifled, leading to stress, anxiety, and even depression. Studies have shown that animals in captivity often exhibit signs of abnormal behavior, such as pacing, over-grooming, or self-mutilation. These behaviors highlight the importance of considering the psychological needs of animals when implementing caging practices.Moreover, the ethical implications of caging cannot be overlooked. Critics argue that keeping animals in enclosures, regardless of the intention, is a form of exploitation that disregards their rights as sentient beings. The question arises: is it justifiable to prioritize human interests over the well-being of animals? This debate is particularly relevant in the context of zoos, where animals are often displayed for entertainment rather than conservation. While some modern zoos strive to create more naturalistic habitats and focus on education, the fundamental issue of caging remains contested.To address the challenges associated with caging, alternative approaches to wildlife conservation are being explored. One promising method is the establishment of wildlife corridors, which allow animals to roam freely between protected areas. This approach not only supports biodiversity but also respects the autonomy of animals by enabling them to live in their natural habitats. Additionally, community-based conservation initiatives empower local populations to protect wildlife while promoting sustainable practices that benefit both humans and animals.In conclusion, the practice of caging animals raises significant questions about conservation efforts and animal welfare. While it may serve a purpose in protecting endangered species, the psychological and ethical ramifications cannot be ignored. As society continues to evolve in its understanding of animal rights, it is crucial to seek alternatives that prioritize the well-being of wildlife. By fostering a deeper appreciation for the natural world and advocating for more humane practices, we can work towards a future where animals are no longer subjected to caging but are allowed to thrive in their rightful environments.

在野生动物保护的世界中，术语caging指的是将动物限制在围栏中的做法，目的是多种多样的。虽然一些人可能认为caging对保护濒危物种或康复受伤动物至关重要，但另一些人则认为这可能导致被限制的生物出现显著的心理痛苦和行为问题。本文旨在探讨caging的影响及其对动物福利的影响，以及围绕这一做法的伦理考量。caging动物的主要原因之一是确保它们免受偷猎者和栖息地破坏的威胁。由于人类活动，如森林砍伐、狩猎和城市发展，许多物种面临风险。通过将这些动物置于受控环境中，保护主义者希望提供一个庇护所，让它们在没有灭绝威胁的情况下繁衍生息。例如，致力于保护濒危物种的组织通常会诉诸于caging，作为保护的手段，使它们能够在安全的环境中繁殖和增长种群。然而，caging的行为可能对动物的心理健康产生不利影响。在野外，动物参与复杂的行为以维持生存，例如捕猎、觅食和社交。当被限制在笼子里时，这些自然本能受到压制，导致压力、焦虑甚至抑郁。研究表明，圈养的动物往往表现出异常行为的迹象，如踱步、过度梳理或自残。这些行为突显了在实施caging实践时考虑动物心理需求的重要性。此外，caging的伦理含义也不容忽视。批评者认为，无论意图如何，将动物限制在围栏中都是一种剥削形式，忽视了它们作为有感知生物的权利。问题随之而来：优先考虑人类利益是否合理，而忽视动物的福祉？这一辩论在动物园的背景下尤其相关，在那里，动物常常被展示以供娱乐，而非保护。虽然一些现代动物园努力创造更自然的栖息地并专注于教育，但caging的根本问题仍然存在争议。为了解决与caging相关的挑战，正在探索替代的野生动物保护方法。一种有前景的方法是建立野生动物走廊，允许动物在保护区之间自由漫游。这种方法不仅支持生物多样性，还通过使动物能够生活在自然栖息地中来尊重它们的自主权。此外，以社区为基础的保护倡议使当地居民能够保护野生动物，同时促进可持续实践，使人类和动物都受益。总之，caging动物的做法引发了关于保护努力和动物福利的重要问题。尽管它可能在保护濒危物种方面发挥作用，但心理和伦理后果不可忽视。随着社会在动物权利理解上的不断发展，寻求优先考虑野生动物福祉的替代方案至关重要。通过深化对自然世界的欣赏并倡导更人道的做法，我们可以朝着一个动物不再遭受caging而是被允许在其应有环境中繁荣的未来努力。