interrogate

简明释义

英[ɪnˈterəɡeɪt]美[ɪnˈterəɡeɪt]

v. 审问，讯问，质问；（在计算机或其他机器上）查询

第 三 人 称 单 数 i n t e r r o g a t e s

现 在 分 词 i n t e r r o g a t i n g

过 去 式 i n t e r r o g a t e d

过 去 分 词 i n t e r r o g a t e d

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.You can set and interrogate these properties using extensions to the existing ESQL vocabulary.

您可以使用现有ESQL词汇的扩展来设置和询问这些属性。

2.The $_SERVER array contains the server variables, allowing us to interrogate the Accept HTTP header.

$_SERVER序列变量包含了服务器端变量，允许程序员重定义AcceptHTTP头信息。

3.Many people go online via a router and typically only the computer directly connected to the device can interrogate it for ID information.

很多人通过路由器上网，而只有直接和路由器相连的电脑才可以向路由器询问它的身份识别信息。

4.The only caveat here is the need to interrogate the returned data to switch on the different data and tracer types.

惟一需要注意的是，您需要查询返回的数据，以接通不同的数据和跟踪程序类型。

5.The lawyer took two hours to interrogate the witness.

律师费两个小时的时间讯问证人。

6. which you should save or interrogate immediately after the dialog command exits (because a subsequent command will immediately change its value).

中，您应当在dialog命令退出后立即保存或询问该变量(因为随后的一个命令会立即改变其值)。

7.I do wish I would not interrogate you, but it seems to me that our time of interdependence is over, and I really should like to know why.

我真的不希望审问你，但是我觉得我们互相依赖的日子已经结束了，我很想知道为什么。

8.Let's return to the family model example from Listing 1 and look at different ways in which you can interrogate it, as shown in Listing 2.

我们返回清单1的家庭模型，看一下可以查询它的不同方法，如清单2所示。

9.The detective decided to interrogate the suspect about his whereabouts on the night of the crime.

侦探决定对嫌疑人进行审问，询问他在犯罪之夜的行踪。

10.During the meeting, the manager will interrogate the team about their progress on the project.

在会议期间，经理将对团队进行询问，了解他们在项目上的进展。

11.The new software allows us to interrogate large datasets easily.

新软件使我们能够轻松地查询大型数据集。

12.The lawyer plans to interrogate the witness before the trial starts.

律师计划在审判开始前对证人进行审问。

13.In order to gather more information, the officer had to interrogate several witnesses.

为了收集更多信息，警官不得不对几位证人进行审问。

作文

In the realm of law enforcement, the ability to interrogate a suspect is a critical skill that can determine the outcome of an investigation. The process of interrogation involves asking questions in a systematic manner to elicit information, confessions, or insights from individuals who may have knowledge about a crime. It is essential for officers to approach this task with both caution and strategy, as the way they interrogate can significantly affect the responses they receive.One of the primary objectives when police officers interrogate a suspect is to gather accurate information. To achieve this, they often employ various techniques that range from building rapport to applying psychological pressure. Building rapport involves creating a connection with the suspect, making them feel comfortable enough to share their thoughts and feelings. This technique can be particularly effective because it encourages suspects to open up, leading to more candid answers.On the other hand, some officers may choose to use more aggressive methods during the interrogation. These tactics can include presenting evidence, making accusations, or even employing deceptive strategies to confuse the suspect. While these methods can sometimes yield quick results, they also carry the risk of obtaining false confessions. When individuals feel cornered or threatened, they may admit to crimes they did not commit simply to escape the pressure of the situation.Ethics play a significant role in the practice of interrogation. Officers must adhere to legal standards and respect the rights of the individuals they are questioning. Coercive tactics, such as physical violence or psychological manipulation, are not only unethical but can also lead to legal repercussions for the officers involved. Therefore, it is crucial for law enforcement agencies to train their personnel in ethical interrogation techniques that prioritize truthfulness and integrity.Moreover, the effectiveness of an interrogation can also depend on the environment in which it takes place. A calm, controlled setting can help facilitate a more productive dialogue between the officer and the suspect. Conversely, a chaotic or intimidating atmosphere may inhibit communication and lead to resistance or hostility. Understanding the dynamics of the interrogation environment is vital for officers aiming to obtain reliable information.In recent years, advancements in technology have also transformed the way officers interrogate suspects. With the availability of audio and video recording equipment, it has become easier to document the entire process. This not only provides a transparent account of the interrogation but also serves as a safeguard against potential misconduct. Recordings can be reviewed for training purposes, ensuring that officers continuously improve their skills and adhere to best practices.In conclusion, the art of interrogate is a complex interplay of psychology, ethics, and strategy. While the ultimate goal is to uncover the truth, it is imperative that law enforcement approaches this task with care and respect for the individuals involved. By prioritizing ethical standards and utilizing effective techniques, officers can enhance their ability to interrogate suspects successfully while maintaining the integrity of the justice system.

在执法领域，审问嫌疑人的能力是决定调查结果的关键技能。审问的过程涉及以系统的方式提问，以引出信息、供词或对可能了解犯罪的个人的见解。警官在进行这项任务时，必须谨慎和有策略地进行，因为他们的审问方式会显著影响所收到的回答。警察在审问嫌疑人时的主要目标之一是收集准确的信息。为了实现这一目标，他们通常会采用多种技术，从建立融洽关系到施加心理压力。建立融洽关系涉及与嫌疑人建立联系，使他们感到足够舒适以分享自己的想法和感受。这种技术特别有效，因为它鼓励嫌疑人敞开心扉，从而导致更坦诚的回答。另一方面，一些警官在审问过程中可能选择使用更具攻击性的方法。这些战术可以包括提供证据、提出指控，甚至使用欺骗性策略来混淆嫌疑人。虽然这些方法有时能快速产生结果，但也带来了获取虚假供词的风险。当个人感到被逼入绝境或受到威胁时，他们可能会承认自己并未犯下的罪行，仅仅是为了逃避当前的压力。伦理在审问实践中发挥着重要作用。警官必须遵循法律标准，并尊重他们所质询的个人的权利。强迫性战术，例如身体暴力或心理操控，不仅不道德，而且可能导致涉事警官面临法律后果。因此，执法机构必须训练其人员掌握优先考虑真实和诚信的伦理审问技术。此外，审问的有效性还取决于进行的环境。一个平静、受控的环境可以帮助促进警官与嫌疑人之间更富有成效的对话。相反，一个混乱或令人畏惧的氛围可能会抑制沟通，导致抵触或敌意。理解审问环境的动态对旨在获得可靠信息的警官至关重要。近年来，技术的进步也改变了警官审问嫌疑人的方式。随着音频和视频录制设备的可用性，记录整个过程变得更加简单。这不仅提供了审问的透明记录，还作为潜在不当行为的保障。录音可以用于培训目的，确保警官不断提高技能，并遵循最佳实践。总之，审问的艺术是心理学、伦理和策略的复杂交织。虽然最终目标是揭示真相，但执法部门在进行这项任务时务必谨慎，并尊重相关个人。通过优先考虑伦理标准并利用有效的技术，警官可以增强成功审问嫌疑人的能力，同时维护司法系统的完整性。