legalism

简明释义

英[ˈliːɡəlɪzəm]美[ˈliːɡəlɪzəm]

n. 拘泥于法律或规定的人；律法尊重主义者；守法主义；法律术语

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.The troubles of legalism in China reflect a poor situation in the present research of legal science, therefore, promoting the legal science is a social responsibility of us.

法条主义所处的“穷途末路”困境恰恰说明了中国法律学研究的贫困，努力推进对中国“法条”的法律学研究是中国法条主义肩负的社会责任。

2.Part Three analyses tax planning's validity from the perspective of principle of tax legalism and the legal effects of tax planning.

第三部分是从税收法定主义原则及税收筹划产生的法律效应两方面来分析税收筹划的合法性。

3.It has been made to look like nit-picking or legalism for anyone to be concerned over what we see, hear, touch or eat.

如果关心我们所看，所听，所摸或所吃的，就被看作像是吹毛求疵或是律法主义了。

4.Sanctification, the meaning of spirituality. legalism and antinomianism. a heart of contentment and thanksgiving. so - called " inferiority complex " ? way of repentance.

成圣，什么是属灵。 律法主义与无律法主义。满足，感恩的心。自卑？悔改之路。

5.The Qin Empire relied on the philosophy of legalism (with skillful advisers like Han Fei and li Si).

在大秦依靠法制的哲学(与熟练顾问像韩霏和郦司)。

6.Legalism of tax revenue is regarded as the most basic principle or the most Paramount principle.

税收法定主义被认为是现代税法最基本的原则或是最高原则。

7.The classic critical spirit demonstrated in the ideological systems of Taoism and Legalism has always enjoyed universal acknowledgement in the academic circles.

道、法思想体系的古典批判精神，历来为学界所公认。

8.The debate over legalism 法治主义 versus moral principles has been ongoing in philosophical circles.

关于legalism 法治主义与道德原则的辩论在哲学界持续进行。

9.In law enforcement, excessive legalism 法治主义 can lead to injustices if officers strictly adhere to the letter of the law.

在执法中，过度的legalism 法治主义如果警察严格遵循法律条文，可能导致不公正现象。

10.Some critics argue that the company's policies reflect a culture of legalism 法治主义, stifling creativity.

一些批评者认为公司的政策反映了一种legalism 法治主义的文化，扼杀了创造力。

11.In many religious contexts, legalism 法治主义 can lead to a rigid interpretation of doctrine.

在许多宗教背景下，legalism 法治主义可能导致对教义的僵化解释。

12.His approach to ethics is often criticized for being too focused on legalism 法治主义, ignoring the spirit of the law.

他对伦理的看法常常被批评过于关注legalism 法治主义，忽视了法律的精神。

作文

Legalism, or 法家 in Chinese philosophy, is a school of thought that emphasizes strict adherence to laws and regulations as a means of maintaining social order. It emerged during the Warring States period in ancient China and was primarily associated with the teachings of Han Feizi. Legalism posits that human nature is inherently selfish and that individuals will act in their own interest unless restrained by laws. This perspective leads to the belief that a strong, centralized authority is necessary to enforce rules and punish those who violate them. In this essay, I will explore the principles of 法家, its historical context, and its implications for modern governance.The historical backdrop of 法家 is essential to understanding its significance. During the Warring States period, China was marked by chaos, warfare, and political fragmentation. Various states vied for power, and traditional moral values were often disregarded in the pursuit of victory. In this environment, thinkers like Han Feizi proposed a system where laws would replace morality as the basis for governance. They believed that clear, written laws would provide stability and predictability, enabling rulers to maintain control over their subjects.One of the core tenets of 法家 is the idea that laws should be clear and publicly known. This transparency ensures that everyone understands the consequences of their actions, thereby discouraging wrongdoing. Furthermore, the legalist approach advocates for severe punishments for transgressions. The rationale behind this is simple: harsh penalties serve as a deterrent, dissuading individuals from engaging in behavior that could threaten the social order. This notion can be seen in various legal systems around the world today, where the severity of punishment is often justified by the need to uphold law and order.However, the implementation of 法家 principles raises ethical questions. Critics argue that a purely legalistic approach to governance can lead to tyranny and oppression. When laws are enforced without consideration for justice or morality, individuals may suffer unjustly. For instance, during the Qin Dynasty, which adopted legalist principles, the government was known for its brutal enforcement of laws, leading to widespread resentment among the populace. This historical example serves as a cautionary tale about the potential dangers of an overly legalistic approach.In contemporary society, the influence of 法家 can still be observed in various legal frameworks. Many modern governments strive to create laws that are clear and enforceable while also ensuring that justice is served. The balance between maintaining order and protecting individual rights remains a contentious issue. For example, debates surrounding criminal justice reform often center on whether punitive measures are effective or if they disproportionately affect marginalized communities. These discussions highlight the ongoing relevance of 法家 principles in shaping our understanding of law and governance.In conclusion, 法家 offers valuable insights into the relationship between law, order, and human behavior. While its emphasis on strict adherence to laws can promote stability, it is crucial to remain vigilant against the potential for abuse of power. As we navigate the complexities of modern governance, the lessons of 法家 remind us of the importance of balancing legalism with compassion and justice.

法家是中国哲学中的一个学派，强调严格遵守法律和法规，以维护社会秩序。它出现在中国的战国时期，主要与韩非子的思想相关。法家认为人性本自私，个人会为了自身利益而行动，除非受到法律的约束。这一观点导致了对强大中央权威的信念，认为有必要执行规则并惩罚那些违反规则的人。在这篇文章中，我将探讨法家的原则、历史背景及其对现代治理的影响。法家的历史背景对于理解其重要性至关重要。在战国时期，中国充满了混乱、战争和政治分裂。各个国家争夺权力，传统道德价值观在追求胜利的过程中常常被忽视。在这种环境下，像韩非子这样的思想家提出了一种以法律取代道德作为治理基础的体系。他们认为，明确的书面法律可以提供稳定性和可预测性，使统治者能够控制他们的臣民。法家的核心信条之一是法律应当清晰且公开。这种透明度确保每个人都理解自己行为的后果，从而抑制不当行为。此外，法家主张对违法行为施以严厉的惩罚。这一理念很简单：严厉的惩罚作为威慑，劝阻个人参与可能威胁社会秩序的行为。这一观点在当今世界的各种法律体系中仍然可以看到，在这些体系中，惩罚的严厉程度常常被合理化为维护法律和秩序的需要。然而，实施法家原则引发了伦理问题。批评者认为，纯粹的法律主义治理方式可能导致暴政和压迫。当法律在没有考虑正义或道德的情况下被执行时，个人可能会遭受不公正的对待。例如，在秦朝，采用法家原则的政府以其对法律的残酷执行而闻名，导致民众普遍愤恨。这一历史例子提醒我们，过于法律主义的方法可能带来的潜在危险。在当代社会，法家的影响仍然可以在各种法律框架中观察到。许多现代政府努力制定清晰且可执行的法律，同时确保公正得到维护。维护秩序与保护个人权利之间的平衡依然是一个有争议的问题。例如，围绕刑事司法改革的辩论常常集中在惩罚措施是否有效，或者它们是否对边缘化社区产生不成比例的影响。这些讨论突显了法家原则在塑造我们对法律和治理理解中的持续相关性。总之，法家为我们提供了关于法律、秩序和人类行为之间关系的重要见解。虽然其对严格遵守法律的强调可以促进稳定，但我们必须保持警惕，防止权力滥用。随着我们在现代治理的复杂性中航行，法家的教训提醒我们，在法律主义与同情和正义之间保持平衡的重要性。