reargument

简明释义

英[/ˌriːˈɑːrɡjumənt/]美[/ˌriːˈɑːrɡjumənt/]

n. 重新辩论；再争论

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Argument was heard in the 1952 Term, and reargument was heard this Term on certain questions propounded by the Court.

终结性辩论于1952年度进行，本年度针对法院提出的特定问题进行了第二次庭审。

2.Argument was heard in the 1952 Term, and reargument was heard this Term on certain questions propounded by the Court.

终结性辩论于1952年度进行，本年度针对法院提出的特定问题进行了第二次庭审。

3.During the debate, the candidate called for a reargument of his policies to clarify his stance.

在辩论中，候选人呼吁对他的政策进行重申论点以澄清他的立场。

4.The lawyer suggested a reargument to strengthen their case in court.

律师建议进行一次重申论点以增强他们在法庭上的案件。

5.After reviewing the evidence, the team decided that a reargument was necessary.

在审查证据后，团队决定有必要进行一次重申论点。

6.The committee will hold a meeting for a reargument of the proposed changes.

委员会将召开会议，对提议的变更进行一次重申论点。

7.The professor encouraged a reargument of the thesis to address the feedback received.

教授鼓励对论文进行重申论点以回应收到的反馈。

作文

In the realm of academic discourse, the concept of reargument plays a pivotal role in enhancing our understanding of complex issues. A reargument refers to the act of presenting a new argument or perspective on a previously discussed topic. This can be particularly beneficial in debates, discussions, and even in everyday conversations, as it allows individuals to reconsider their positions and potentially arrive at a more nuanced understanding of the subject matter. For instance, consider a debate surrounding climate change. Initially, one might argue that climate change is primarily caused by human activities, such as deforestation and fossil fuel consumption. However, a reargument could introduce the idea that natural factors, like volcanic eruptions and solar radiation, also significantly contribute to climate variations. This new perspective encourages participants in the discussion to broaden their views and consider additional evidence that may have been overlooked.Furthermore, the process of reargument fosters critical thinking skills. When individuals are challenged to rethink their arguments or to defend their positions against new information, they engage in deeper cognitive processes. This not only helps them solidify their own understanding but also equips them with the ability to articulate their thoughts more clearly and effectively. In this way, reargument serves as a catalyst for intellectual growth and development.Moreover, reargument is essential in the field of law. Legal professionals often revisit previous cases and rulings to construct new arguments that align with changing societal values or emerging evidence. For example, the ongoing discussions about civil rights often involve reargument of past legal decisions to advocate for more equitable laws. By reexamining these cases, lawyers can highlight inconsistencies or outdated interpretations that no longer serve justice. In addition to its academic and legal significance, reargument is also relevant in personal relationships. When disagreements arise, revisiting the initial arguments can lead to a better understanding of each person's perspective. For instance, if two friends argue about a decision made during a group project, a reargument could help them see the situation from each other's viewpoints, ultimately leading to a resolution. This practice not only improves communication but also strengthens relationships by fostering empathy and collaboration.In conclusion, the concept of reargument is invaluable across various domains of life. Whether in academia, law, or personal interactions, the ability to revisit and reformulate arguments leads to richer discussions and deeper understanding. Embracing reargument not only enhances critical thinking but also promotes an environment where diverse perspectives are valued and considered. As we continue to engage with complex issues, let us remember the importance of reargument in fostering growth, understanding, and meaningful dialogue.

在学术讨论的领域中，reargument（重新论证）的概念在增强我们对复杂问题的理解方面发挥着关键作用。reargument指的是对先前讨论过的话题提出新的论点或观点。这在辩论、讨论甚至日常对话中尤为有益，因为它使个人能够重新考虑自己的立场，并可能达到对主题更细致入微的理解。例如，考虑关于气候变化的辩论。最初，人们可能会争辩气候变化主要是由人类活动引起的，如森林砍伐和化石燃料消费。然而，reargument可以引入自然因素，如火山喷发和太阳辐射，也对气候变化产生重大影响。这种新观点鼓励参与讨论的人拓宽视野，考虑可能被忽视的额外证据。此外，reargument的过程促进了批判性思维技能。当个人被挑战去重新思考他们的论点或为自己的立场辩护时，他们会进行更深层次的认知过程。这不仅帮助他们巩固自己的理解，还使他们能够更清晰有效地表达自己的想法。因此，reargument作为智力成长和发展的催化剂。此外，reargument在法律领域也是必不可少的。法律专业人士经常重新审视以前的案例和裁决，以构建与不断变化的社会价值观或新出现的证据相一致的新论点。例如，关于公民权利的持续讨论通常涉及对过去法律决定的reargument，以倡导更公平的法律。通过重新审视这些案例，律师可以突出不一致或不再公正的过时解释。除了在学术和法律上的重要性，reargument在个人关系中也相关。当出现分歧时，重新审视初始论点可以使双方更好地理解彼此的观点。例如，如果两个朋友就小组项目中的某个决定发生争执，reargument可以帮助他们从对方的角度看待情况，最终达成解决方案。这一做法不仅改善了沟通，还通过促进同理心和合作来增强关系。总之，reargument这一概念在生活的各个领域都是无价的。无论是在学术、法律还是个人互动中，重新审视和重新构建论点的能力都会导致更丰富的讨论和更深刻的理解。接受reargument不仅增强了批判性思维，还促进了一个重视和考虑多样化观点的环境。在我们继续参与复杂问题的过程中，让我们铭记reargument在促进成长、理解和有意义对话方面的重要性。