bluster

简明释义

英[ˈblʌstə(r)]美[ˈblʌstər]

v. 咆哮，气势汹汹地说（但效果不大）；（风暴）呼啸；（雨）倾泻

n. 气势汹汹的话

第 三 人 称 单 数 b l u s t e r s

现 在 分 词 b l u s t e r i n g

过 去 式 b l u s t e r e d

过 去 分 词 b l u s t e r e d

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Strength is not in bluster and noise.

力量不在怒吼和高声之中。

2.We could hear the bluster of the wind and rain.

我们能听到狂风暴雨的吹打声。

3.Strip away the bluster, and this was a fight about electoral advantage. It is hard to say who has won.

剥开空泛之谈，这是一场选举利益之争，如今胜负未定。

4.This helps to explain why the PES, for all its bluster, has not fielded a candidate against Mr Barroso.

这也可以解释为什么虽然PES在宣传上采取高调，却没有推出任何一名候选人与巴罗佐唱对台。

5.Vaguely similar words like "blow" and "bluster" are offered, but I don't know.

大致相似的单词，像“blow”和“bluster”都被提出来，但我不知道到底哪个才是真的。

6.He impressed no one by his bluster.

他的大话没有给任何人留下印象。

7.Despite his bluster, we all knew he was nervous about the presentation.

尽管他的虚张声势，我们都知道他对演讲感到紧张。

8.She tried to intimidate her opponents with bluster, but it didn't work.

她试图用虚张声势来威吓对手，但没有成功。

9.The politician's speech was filled with bluster, making grand promises without any real plan.

这位政治家的演讲充满了虚张声势，做出宏伟的承诺却没有实际的计划。

10.His bluster about being the best player only made him look foolish.

他关于自己是最佳球员的虚张声势只让他显得愚蠢。

11.The storm outside was nothing compared to the bluster of the wind.

外面的风暴与风的咆哮相比根本不值一提。

作文

In today's world, the concept of leadership is often scrutinized and debated. Many people believe that a strong leader must possess a commanding presence, exuding confidence and authority. However, there is a fine line between genuine leadership and mere bluster. Bluster refers to loud, aggressive, or boastful behavior that lacks substance. It can be tempting for leaders to resort to bluster to project strength, especially in challenging situations. Yet, this approach can ultimately be counterproductive.Consider the example of a corporate leader who often uses bluster to motivate their team. They may shout about their vision and promise grand results, but when it comes time to deliver, the reality may fall short. This kind of empty rhetoric can lead to disillusionment among employees, who may feel that they are being sold a false bill of goods. Instead of fostering a culture of trust and collaboration, bluster can create an environment of skepticism and disengagement.In contrast, effective leaders communicate with clarity and authenticity. They acknowledge challenges and articulate realistic goals, rather than relying on bluster to mask uncertainty. For instance, during a crisis, a leader who calmly assesses the situation and provides actionable steps will likely gain the respect and support of their team. This approach not only builds credibility but also empowers others to contribute solutions.Moreover, bluster can manifest in political arenas as well. Politicians often use bluster to rally support or deflect criticism. While it may garner temporary applause from certain audiences, it rarely leads to meaningful change. Voters are becoming increasingly savvy and can discern when a candidate is using bluster instead of presenting concrete plans. As a result, those who rely heavily on bluster may find themselves facing backlash when their promises are unfulfilled.The consequences of bluster extend beyond personal reputation; they can impact entire organizations and communities. A leader who consistently resorts to bluster may create a toxic environment where fear and uncertainty thrive. Employees may feel pressured to conform to the loudest voices, stifling innovation and creativity. In such cases, the true potential of the group remains untapped, as individuals are discouraged from sharing their ideas or challenging the status quo.To cultivate a healthy and productive atmosphere, leaders should strive to replace bluster with transparency and humility. By admitting their limitations and seeking input from others, they can foster a sense of belonging and shared purpose. This collaborative spirit enhances problem-solving and encourages diverse perspectives, ultimately leading to stronger outcomes.In conclusion, while bluster may seem like a shortcut to gaining attention or authority, it is often a facade that reveals deeper insecurities. True leadership requires the courage to be vulnerable and the wisdom to listen. By moving away from bluster and embracing authenticity, leaders can inspire genuine loyalty and drive lasting success. The journey toward effective leadership is not about shouting the loudest but rather about creating an environment where everyone feels valued and empowered to contribute their best selves.

在当今世界，领导力的概念经常受到审视和辩论。许多人认为，一个强有力的领导者必须具备指挥的气场，散发出自信和权威。然而，真正的领导与单纯的夸夸其谈之间存在着微妙的界限。夸夸其谈指的是缺乏实质内容的喧闹、攻击性或自夸的行为。领导者在面对挑战时可能会倾向于诉诸于夸夸其谈来展示力量。然而，这种方法最终可能适得其反。考虑一个企业领导者的例子，他们经常使用夸夸其谈来激励团队。他们可能大声喊出自己的愿景，并承诺取得宏伟的成果，但当时机来临时，现实可能远远落后。这种空洞的言辞可能导致员工的失望，他们可能会觉得自己被出售了虚假的商品。相反，依赖于夸夸其谈来掩盖不确定性，反而会造成信任和合作文化的破坏。相比之下，有效的领导者以清晰和真实的方式进行沟通。他们承认挑战，并阐明现实的目标，而不是依赖于夸夸其谈来掩饰不安。例如，在危机期间，一位冷静评估情况并提供可行步骤的领导者，可能会赢得团队的尊重和支持。这种方式不仅建立了信誉，还赋予他人贡献解决方案的能力。此外，夸夸其谈在政治领域也有所表现。政治家们常常利用夸夸其谈来争取支持或转移批评。虽然这可能会在某些观众中获得暂时的掌声，但很少能带来有意义的变化。选民们变得越来越聪明，能够识别候选人是在使用夸夸其谈而不是提出具体计划。因此，那些过度依赖夸夸其谈的人可能会在未能实现承诺时面临反弹。夸夸其谈的后果超越个人声誉；它们可能影响整个组织和社区。一个持续诉诸于夸夸其谈的领导者，可能会创造一个恐惧和不确定性滋生的有毒环境。员工可能会感到被迫迎合最响亮的声音，从而窒息创新和创造力。在这种情况下，团队的真正潜力得不到发挥，因为个体被阻止分享他们的想法或挑战现状。为了培养健康和富有成效的氛围，领导者应努力用透明和谦逊取代夸夸其谈。通过承认自己的局限性并寻求他人的意见，他们可以营造一种归属感和共同目标感。这种合作精神增强了解决问题的能力，鼓励多元化的视角，最终导致更强的结果。总之，尽管夸夸其谈似乎是获得注意或权威的捷径，但它往往是一种揭示更深层不安全感的外表。真正的领导力需要勇气去展现脆弱，以及倾听的智慧。通过摆脱夸夸其谈，拥抱真实，领导者可以激发真正的忠诚，推动持久的成功。有效领导的旅程不是关于大声喊叫，而是关于创造一个每个人都感到被重视和有能力贡献自己最佳自我的环境。