reductively

简明释义

英[rɪˈdʌktɪvli]美[rɪˈdʌktɪvli]

减少地

还原地

有缩减趋势地

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Bio-reductive drugs are pro-drugs that can selectively target the hypoxia cells in tumors. In reductive environment, they are reductively metabolized to generate toxic species.

生物还原剂是一种具有肿瘤乏氧靶向性的前药，它会在还原性环境中被还原产生具有细胞毒性的代谢物。

2.Bio-reductive drugs are pro-drugs that can selectively target the hypoxia cells in tumors. In reductive environment, they are reductively metabolized to generate toxic species.

生物还原剂是一种具有肿瘤乏氧靶向性的前药，它会在还原性环境中被还原产生具有细胞毒性的代谢物。

3.The documentary reductively portrays the conflict as a simple good versus evil scenario.

这部纪录片简化地将冲突描绘成一个简单的善恶对立的情景。

4.When explaining the theory, he often presents it reductively, which can lead to misunderstandings.

在解释理论时，他常常简化地呈现，这可能导致误解。

5.In her analysis, she approached the topic reductively, ignoring many important variables.

在她的分析中，她简单化地处理了这个话题，忽略了许多重要变量。

6.Critics argue that the film reductively represents historical events without nuance.

批评者认为这部电影简化地表现了历史事件，没有细微差别。

7.The author discusses the complex issue of climate change reductively, focusing only on carbon emissions.

作者简化地讨论了气候变化这一复杂问题，仅关注碳排放。

作文

In the realm of academic discourse, it is crucial to approach complex issues with a nuanced perspective. However, some arguments tend to simplify intricate topics, often reductively (简化地) reducing them to mere binaries. This tendency can lead to misunderstandings and oversimplifications that do not accurately reflect the multifaceted nature of the subject matter.For instance, consider the debate surrounding climate change. Some individuals argue that the solution lies solely in renewable energy sources, while others insist on the importance of conservation efforts. When discussions are framed reductively (简化地), they may overlook the interplay between various factors such as policy, technology, and social behavior. A more holistic approach would recognize that addressing climate change requires a combination of strategies rather than a singular focus on one aspect.Furthermore, in the context of social issues, the reductive (简化的) narratives can perpetuate stereotypes and biases. For example, discussions about poverty often fall into the trap of blaming individuals for their circumstances without considering systemic factors such as education, employment opportunities, and access to resources. By framing these issues reductively (简化地), we risk ignoring the broader societal structures that contribute to inequality.Moreover, the media plays a significant role in shaping public perception. News outlets may present stories in a way that emphasizes sensationalism, often reductively (简化地) portraying events to attract viewership. This can result in a distorted understanding of reality, where complex events are boiled down to catchy headlines or soundbites. Consequently, audiences may form opinions based on incomplete information, reinforcing misconceptions rather than fostering informed discussions.In academia, the challenge of reductively (简化地) categorizing knowledge also arises. Scholars must be cautious not to oversimplify theories or concepts in their quest for clarity. While it is essential to make ideas accessible, doing so at the expense of depth can undermine the richness of intellectual inquiry. For instance, when discussing psychological theories, reducing them to simplistic terms may fail to capture the intricacies of human behavior and cognition.To combat the pitfalls of reductively (简化地) framing issues, it is vital to cultivate critical thinking skills. Engaging with diverse perspectives and encouraging open dialogue can help individuals appreciate the complexity of various topics. By fostering an environment where questions are welcomed and multiple viewpoints are considered, we can move beyond simplistic narratives and develop a more comprehensive understanding of the world around us.In conclusion, while the tendency to approach issues reductively (简化地) is prevalent in many discussions, it is imperative to resist this inclination. Embracing complexity and nuance not only enriches our understanding but also promotes empathy and informed decision-making. As we navigate the complexities of contemporary society, let us strive to engage with ideas thoughtfully and critically, recognizing that the world is rarely black and white.

在学术讨论的领域中，以细致入微的视角来处理复杂问题至关重要。然而，有些论点往往会简化复杂的话题，常常简化地将其归结为简单的二元对立。这种倾向可能导致误解和过于简单化的结果，这并不能准确反映主题的多面性。例如，考虑气候变化的辩论。一些人认为解决方案仅在于可再生能源，而另一些人则坚持保护措施的重要性。当讨论以简化地方式框定时，可能会忽视各种因素之间的相互作用，例如政策、技术和社会行为。更全面的方法将承认，应对气候变化需要多种策略的结合，而不是单一关注某一方面。此外，在社会问题的背景下，简化的叙述可能会延续刻板印象和偏见。例如，关于贫困的讨论常常陷入将个人归咎于其处境的陷阱，而不考虑教育、就业机会和资源获取等系统性因素。通过简化地框定这些问题，我们冒着忽视导致不平等的更广泛社会结构的风险。此外，媒体在塑造公众认知方面也发挥着重要作用。新闻媒体可能以强调轰动效应的方式呈现故事，常常简化地描绘事件以吸引观众。这可能导致对现实的扭曲理解，其中复杂事件被压缩成引人注目的标题或简短的言论。因此，观众可能基于不完整的信息形成观点，加深误解，而不是促进知情的讨论。在学术界，简化地分类知识的挑战也会出现。学者们必须谨慎，不要在追求清晰的过程中过于简单化理论或概念。虽然使思想易于理解至关重要，但如果以深度为代价，就可能削弱智力探究的丰富性。例如，在讨论心理学理论时，将其简化为简单的术语可能无法捕捉到人类行为和认知的复杂性。为了克服简化地框定问题的陷阱，培养批判性思维能力至关重要。与多元观点互动并鼓励开放对话可以帮助人们欣赏各种话题的复杂性。通过营造一个欢迎提问和考虑多重观点的环境，我们可以超越简单的叙事，发展对周围世界更全面的理解。总之，尽管在许多讨论中倾向于简化地处理问题，但抵制这种倾向是极其重要的。接受复杂性和细微差别不仅丰富了我们的理解，还促进了同理心和知情决策。在我们驾驭当代社会的复杂性时，让我们努力以深思熟虑和批判性的态度参与思想，认识到世界很少是非黑即白的。