contestation

简明释义

英[ˌkɒntesˈteɪʃ(ə)n]美[ˌkɑːntesˈteɪʃən]

n. 争论；主张

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.A contestation of the police and their arrest of the man.

一场警察和他们所逮捕的男子的争论。

2.The literature theories construction aspect, it expresses the contestation that causes for "the literature subjectivity" put forward of theories and it first.

在文学理论建设方面，它首先表现为“文学主体性”理论的提出及其引发的论争。

3.The "obscure poem" has become the focus of study in the circle of poets, and has brought about a constant point in contestation of the poetry phenomenon.

“朦胧诗”是当代诗歌研究的热点之一，同时也是不断产生论争的诗学现象。

4.Interiors play a crucial role in the construction of identity and they represent power and control through the contestation or transgression of boundaries.

室内设计在构建个性的过程中起到重要作用。他们通过争论或逾越界定空间宣示权力和控制。

5.The literature theories construction aspect, it expresses the contestation that causes for "the literature subjectivity" put forward of theories and it first.

在文学理论建设方面，它首先表现为“文学主体性”理论的提出及其引发的论争。

6.The contestation of land ownership has been a long-standing issue in the region.

土地所有权的争议在该地区已是一个长期存在的问题。

7.Legal contestation over the patent rights delayed the product launch for several months.

关于专利权的法律争议使产品发布延迟了几个月。

8.In academic circles, there is often contestation over the interpretation of historical events.

在学术界，关于历史事件的解读常常存在争议。

9.The recent election results have led to significant contestation, with many claiming irregularities in the voting process.

最近的选举结果引发了严重的争议，许多人声称投票过程存在不规范。

10.The environmental policies proposed by the government faced contestation from various activist groups.

政府提出的环境政策遭到了多个活动组织的争议。

作文

In the realm of politics and social movements, the concept of contestation (争论) plays a crucial role in shaping public discourse and influencing policy decisions. Contestation refers to the act of challenging or disputing established norms, beliefs, or authorities. It is an essential mechanism through which marginalized voices can be heard and societal changes can be initiated. This essay will explore the importance of contestation (争论) in democratic societies, its implications for social justice, and the ways in which it can foster constructive dialogue among diverse groups.Firstly, contestation (争论) is fundamental to the functioning of democracy. In democratic systems, the ability to question and challenge the status quo is not only encouraged but is also vital for progress. For instance, social movements such as the Civil Rights Movement in the United States exemplify how contestation (争论) can lead to significant legislative changes. Activists and leaders like Martin Luther King Jr. utilized peaceful protests, speeches, and legal challenges to contest racial segregation and discrimination. Their efforts highlighted the injustices faced by African Americans and ultimately led to landmark legislation that changed the course of American history.Moreover, contestation (争论) serves as a catalyst for social justice. When individuals or groups feel oppressed or marginalized, they often resort to contestation as a means of asserting their rights and demanding change. The #MeToo movement, for example, emerged as a powerful response to systemic sexual harassment and violence. By sharing their stories and experiences, individuals engaged in contestation (争论) against a culture of silence and complicity. This collective action not only raised awareness about the prevalence of sexual misconduct but also prompted organizations and institutions to reevaluate their policies and practices regarding harassment.Furthermore, contestation (争论) can foster constructive dialogue among diverse groups. In a pluralistic society, differing opinions and perspectives are inevitable. However, when these differences are approached through the lens of contestation (争论), they can lead to meaningful discussions and potential resolutions. For instance, debates surrounding climate change often involve conflicting viewpoints from scientists, policymakers, and industry representatives. Engaging in respectful contestation allows these stakeholders to present their arguments, challenge each other's assumptions, and ultimately work towards a common goal of environmental sustainability. This process not only enhances understanding but also encourages collaboration across ideological divides.Nevertheless, it is essential to recognize that contestation (争论) must be conducted in a manner that promotes respect and civility. In recent years, the rise of social media has transformed the landscape of public discourse, often leading to toxic environments where hostility and aggression overshadow constructive debate. While contestation is necessary for progress, it is crucial to maintain a focus on dialogue rather than division. Encouraging open-mindedness and empathy can help mitigate the negative aspects of contestation (争论) and foster an atmosphere conducive to positive change.In conclusion, contestation (争论) is a vital component of democratic societies, serving as a mechanism for social change and justice. By challenging established norms and advocating for marginalized voices, individuals and groups can effect meaningful transformations within their communities. Furthermore, when approached with respect and openness, contestation (争论) can facilitate constructive dialogue among diverse perspectives. As we navigate the complexities of contemporary issues, embracing the spirit of contestation will be essential for fostering a more just and equitable society.

在政治和社会运动的领域，contestation（争论）这一概念在塑造公共话语和影响政策决策方面发挥着至关重要的作用。争论是指挑战或争议既定规范、信仰或权威的行为。这是一个基本机制，通过它，边缘化的声音能够被听到，社会变革得以启动。本文将探讨contestation（争论）在民主社会中的重要性，其对社会正义的影响，以及它如何促进不同群体之间的建设性对话。首先，contestation（争论）是民主运作的基础。在民主制度中，质疑和挑战现状的能力不仅受到鼓励，而且对于进步至关重要。例如，美国的民权运动就是一个典范，它展示了contestation（争论）如何导致重大立法变化。马丁·路德·金等活动家和领导者利用和平抗议、演讲和法律挑战来反对种族隔离和歧视。他们的努力突显了非裔美国人面临的不公正，并最终导致了改变美国历史的里程碑立法。此外，contestation（争论）是社会正义的催化剂。当个人或群体感到被压迫或边缘化时，他们往往会诉诸于争论，以此作为主张权利和要求变革的手段。例如，#MeToo运动就是对系统性性骚扰和暴力的强有力回应。通过分享他们的故事和经历，个人参与了对沉默与共谋文化的contestation（争论）。这种集体行动不仅提高了人们对性行为不当普遍性的认识，还促使组织和机构重新评估其关于骚扰的政策和做法。此外，contestation（争论）可以促进不同群体之间的建设性对话。在多元化的社会中，意见和观点的不同是不可避免的。然而，当这些差异通过contestation（争论）的视角进行处理时，它们可以引导出有意义的讨论和潜在的解决方案。例如，围绕气候变化的辩论往往涉及科学家、政策制定者和行业代表之间的冲突观点。尊重地参与争论使这些利益相关者能够提出自己的论点，挑战彼此的假设，并最终朝着环境可持续性的共同目标努力。这一过程不仅增强了理解，还有助于跨意识形态的合作。然而，必须认识到，contestation（争论）必须以促进尊重和文明的方式进行。近年来，社交媒体的兴起改变了公共话语的格局，往往导致敌对和攻击的有毒环境掩盖了建设性辩论。虽然争论对进步是必要的，但保持关注对话而非分裂至关重要。鼓励开放的心态和同理心可以帮助缓解contestation（争论）的负面方面，并营造有利于积极变革的氛围。总之，contestation（争论）是民主社会的重要组成部分，是社会变革和正义的机制。通过挑战既定规范和倡导边缘化的声音，个人和群体能够在其社区内产生有意义的变化。此外，当以尊重和开放的态度进行时，contestation（争论）可以促进不同观点之间的建设性对话。在我们应对当代问题的复杂性时，拥抱争论的精神将对促进一个更加公正和公平的社会至关重要。