logomachy

简明释义

英[lɒˈɡɒməki]美[ləˈɡɑːməki]

n. 对词义的争执；文字游戏；舌战，口角

复 数 l o g o m a c h i e s

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Their logomachy was far more stimulating to his intellect than the reserved and quiet dogmatism of Mr. Morse.

他们的唇枪舌剑要比莫尔斯先生们沉着冷静的教条更刺激起他的思考。

2.Their logomachy was far more stimulating to his intellect than the reserved and quiet dogmatism of Mr. Morse.

他们的唇枪舌剑要比莫尔斯先生们沉着冷静的教条更刺激起他的思考。

3.During the meeting, the team engaged in a logomachy 语言争执 over minor details.

在会议期间，团队围绕小细节展开了logomachy 语言争执。

4.The debate turned into a logomachy 语言争执 over the definition of freedom.

辩论变成了对自由定义的logomachy 语言争执。

5.Their logomachy 语言争执 about the rules of the game frustrated the players.

他们关于游戏规则的logomachy 语言争执让玩家感到沮丧。

6.The political discussion devolved into a logomachy 语言争执 that achieved nothing.

政治讨论退化为一场毫无成果的logomachy 语言争执。

7.In academic circles, a logomachy 语言争执 often arises when scholars interpret texts differently.

在学术界，当学者们对文本的解释不同的时候，常常会出现logomachy 语言争执。

作文

In today's world, we often find ourselves engaged in various forms of communication. However, not all communication is productive or meaningful. One phenomenon that has become increasingly common is the tendency towards logomachy, which refers to a dispute or argument about words or their meanings. This can be seen in many aspects of our lives, from political debates to social media discussions. The rise of the internet and social media platforms has amplified this issue, as people are now able to express their opinions more freely than ever before. To understand the implications of logomachy, we must first recognize its origins. The term comes from the Greek words 'logos', meaning word, and 'machia', meaning battle. Thus, logomachy literally translates to 'battle of words'. This concept highlights how disagreements can often stem from misunderstandings rather than genuine ideological differences. For instance, two individuals may argue passionately about a topic, but if they are using different definitions for the same terms, their argument may be futile. In politics, logomachy can lead to gridlock and inefficiency. Politicians may spend more time arguing over the semantics of a policy rather than addressing the actual issues at hand. This can frustrate constituents who are looking for real solutions. Moreover, when politicians engage in logomachy, it can create a toxic atmosphere where genuine dialogue is replaced by name-calling and insults. This not only hampers progress but also alienates voters who may feel disillusioned with the political process.Social media is another arena where logomachy thrives. Platforms like Twitter and Facebook allow users to share their thoughts quickly, but they also foster an environment where arguments can escalate rapidly. A simple disagreement can turn into a heated exchange, with users focusing on the words being used rather than the underlying issues. This often leads to a lack of understanding and empathy, as individuals become more concerned with winning the argument than with listening to differing viewpoints. Furthermore, logomachy can have negative consequences for personal relationships. Friends and family members may find themselves embroiled in arguments over trivial matters, losing sight of what truly matters in their relationships. When disagreements devolve into logomachy, it can create rifts that are difficult to mend. Effective communication requires not only clarity in expression but also a willingness to listen and understand others' perspectives. So, how can we combat logomachy in our daily lives? First, we must strive to clarify our own language and ensure that we are using terms consistently. This involves being aware of the potential for misunderstanding and taking the time to define our terms when necessary. Additionally, we should practice active listening, making an effort to understand the other person's viewpoint before responding. By doing so, we can foster more constructive conversations and reduce the likelihood of falling into the trap of logomachy. In conclusion, while disagreement is a natural part of human interaction, logomachy can hinder our ability to communicate effectively. By recognizing the importance of clear language and open-mindedness, we can engage in more meaningful discussions that promote understanding and collaboration. As we navigate our increasingly complex world, it is essential to move beyond mere battles of words and focus on the ideas and values that truly matter.

在当今世界，我们经常发现自己参与各种形式的交流。然而，并非所有的交流都是富有成效或有意义的。一个日益普遍的现象是倾向于logomachy，即关于词语或其含义的争论或争吵。这可以在我们生活的许多方面看到，从政治辩论到社交媒体讨论。互联网和社交媒体平台的兴起加剧了这个问题，因为人们现在能够比以往任何时候都更自由地表达自己的意见。要理解logomachy的含义，我们必须首先认识到它的起源。该术语来自希腊语单词“logos”，意为“词”，和“machia”，意为“战斗”。因此，logomachy字面上翻译为“词语之战”。这一概念突显出争论往往源于误解，而非真正的意识形态差异。例如，两个人可能会热烈争论某个话题，但如果他们对同一术语使用不同的定义，他们的争论可能是徒劳的。在政治中，logomachy可能导致僵局和低效。政治家们可能花更多时间争论政策的语义，而不是解决实际问题。这会让希望寻找真正解决方案的选民感到沮丧。此外，当政治家参与logomachy时，可能会造成一种有毒的氛围，在这种氛围中，真正的对话被人身攻击和侮辱所取代。这不仅妨碍了进展，还使选民感到失望，他们可能对政治过程感到幻灭。社交媒体是另一个logomachy蓬勃发展的领域。像Twitter和Facebook这样的平台允许用户快速分享他们的想法，但它们也培养了一种环境，在这种环境中，争论可以迅速升级。一次简单的分歧可能会变成激烈的争论，用户关注的是所使用的词汇，而不是潜在的问题。这通常会导致缺乏理解和同情，因为个人变得更加关心赢得争论，而不是倾听不同的观点。此外，logomachy可能对个人关系产生负面影响。朋友和家庭成员可能发现自己卷入琐碎事务的争论中，失去了与关系中真正重要的东西的视野。当争论演变成logomachy时，可能会造成难以修复的裂痕。有效的沟通不仅需要表达清晰，还需要愿意倾听和理解他人的观点。那么，我们如何在日常生活中抗击logomachy呢？首先，我们必须努力澄清自己的语言，确保我们使用的术语是一致的。这涉及到意识到误解的潜在可能性，并在必要时花时间定义我们的术语。此外，我们应该练习积极倾听，努力理解对方的观点，然后再作回应。通过这样做，我们可以促进更具建设性的对话，减少陷入logomachy陷阱的可能性。总之，虽然分歧是人际互动的自然部分，但logomachy可能会阻碍我们有效沟通的能力。通过认识到清晰语言和开放思想的重要性，我们可以进行更有意义的讨论，促进理解与合作。在我们驾驭日益复杂的世界时，超越单纯的词语之战，专注于真正重要的思想和价值观至关重要。