pontification

简明释义

英[ˌpɒn.tɪ.fɪˈkeɪ.ʃən]美[ˌpɒn.tɪ.fɪˈkeɪ.ʃən]

武断地发表意见

训话

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.In fact, in the birth of an idea Gemini is better at pontification than direction, but this is a valuable contribution to Libra's mental process.

实际上，在想出一个点子的时候，双子往往更擅长于夸夸其谈而非给出明确方向，而这对天秤的思路几乎毫无帮助。

2.In fact, in the birth of an idea Gemini is better at pontification than direction, but this is a valuable contribution to Libra's mental process.

实际上，在想出一个点子的时候，双子往往更擅长于夸夸其谈而非给出明确方向，而这对天秤的思路几乎毫无帮助。

3.Her pontification 自以为是的讲述 on politics often turned debates into monologues.

她对政治的pontification 自以为是的讲述常常把辩论变成独白。

4.His pontification 自以为是的讲述 on the subject made him seem arrogant rather than knowledgeable.

他在这个话题上的pontification 自以为是的讲述让他显得傲慢而不是博学。

5.During the meeting, his constant pontification 自以为是的讲述 about the company's future plans annoyed everyone.

在会议期间，他对公司未来计划的不断pontification 自以为是的讲述让每个人都感到厌烦。

6.I appreciate your insights, but your pontification 自以为是的讲述 is making it hard to have a conversation.

我欣赏你的见解，但你的pontification 自以为是的讲述让谈话变得困难。

7.The professor's pontification 自以为是的讲述 on philosophy was enlightening but could be overwhelming at times.

教授关于哲学的pontification 自以为是的讲述很有启发性，但有时也会让人感到难以承受。

作文

In today's world, where information is abundant and opinions are readily shared, the term pontification (自以为是的说教) has become increasingly relevant. It refers to the act of expressing one's opinions in a way that is dogmatic and often arrogant, as if one holds a superior understanding of a subject. This behavior can be seen in various contexts, from political debates to social media discussions, where individuals often assert their views without considering alternative perspectives. The phenomenon of pontification can be particularly detrimental in discussions that require open-mindedness and collaboration. For instance, in a classroom setting, a student who engages in pontification may dominate the conversation, dismissing others' contributions and stifling the exchange of ideas. This not only undermines the learning environment but also prevents the collective growth of knowledge that occurs when diverse viewpoints are shared. Moreover, in the realm of politics, pontification can lead to polarization and division among constituents. Politicians who engage in this behavior may prioritize their personal agenda over the common good, using their platform to preach rather than to listen. This creates an atmosphere where compromise becomes nearly impossible, as each side entrenches itself in its own beliefs, often leading to gridlock and frustration among voters. Social media platforms have exacerbated the issue of pontification. With the anonymity and distance provided by the internet, individuals may feel emboldened to express their opinions with little regard for the feelings or thoughts of others. The comment sections of articles and social media posts are often filled with users who engage in pontification, insisting on their version of the truth while disregarding factual evidence or differing opinions. This not only creates echo chambers but also fosters an environment where constructive dialogue is replaced by hostility and defensiveness. To combat pontification, it is essential to cultivate a culture of humility and openness. Encouraging individuals to approach discussions with a mindset of curiosity rather than judgment can help mitigate the negative effects of this behavior. By actively listening to others and valuing diverse perspectives, we can create spaces where meaningful conversations can flourish. Furthermore, education plays a crucial role in addressing pontification. Teaching critical thinking skills and the importance of empathy can empower individuals to engage in discussions more thoughtfully. When people learn to appreciate the complexity of issues and recognize that there are often multiple valid viewpoints, they are less likely to fall into the trap of dogmatic expression. In conclusion, while pontification (自以为是的说教) may seem like a harmless expression of opinion, its implications can be far-reaching and detrimental to healthy discourse. By fostering an environment that values open-mindedness and respect for differing viewpoints, we can work towards reducing the prevalence of pontification in our conversations and creating a more inclusive and collaborative society.

在当今这个信息丰富、意见随处可见的世界中，术语pontification（自以为是的说教）变得越来越相关。它指的是以一种教条和往往傲慢的方式表达个人观点的行为，仿佛自己对某个主题有着更高的理解。这种行为可以在各种背景中看到，从政治辩论到社交媒体讨论，个体常常在不考虑替代观点的情况下坚持自己的看法。pontification现象在需要开放思维和合作的讨论中可能特别有害。例如，在课堂环境中，一个参与pontification的学生可能会主导谈话，忽视他人的贡献，从而扼杀思想交流。这不仅削弱了学习环境，还阻碍了知识的集体增长，因为多样的观点没有得到分享。此外，在政治领域，pontification可能导致选民之间的极化和分裂。参与这种行为的政治家可能将个人议程置于公共利益之上，利用他们的平台进行说教而不是倾听。这创造了一个妨碍妥协的氛围，因为每一方都固守自己的信念，往往导致僵局和选民的沮丧。社交媒体平台加剧了pontification的问题。在互联网提供的匿名性和距离感下，个人可能会感到勇敢，毫不顾忌地表达自己的意见。文章和社交媒体帖子下的评论区通常充满了参与pontification的用户，他们坚持自己的真理版本，而无视事实证据或不同意见。这不仅创造了回音室，还促使一个建设性对话被敌意和防御所取代。为了解决pontification问题，培养谦逊和开放的文化至关重要。鼓励个体以好奇心而非判断的心态参与讨论，可以帮助减轻这种行为的负面影响。通过积极倾听他人并重视多样的观点，我们可以创造出有意义的对话空间。此外，教育在解决pontification方面起着关键作用。教授批判性思维技能和同理心的重要性，可以使个体更有能力以更周到的方式参与讨论。当人们学会欣赏问题的复杂性，并认识到通常存在多种有效观点时，他们就不太可能陷入教条表达的陷阱。总之，虽然pontification（自以为是的说教）看似是一种无害的意见表达，但其影响可能深远且对健康的讨论有害。通过培养重视开放思维和尊重不同观点的环境，我们可以努力减少对话中pontification的普遍性，创造一个更加包容和合作的社会。