confiscation

简明释义

英[ˌkɒnfɪˈskeɪʃn]美[ˌkɑːnfɪˈskeɪʃn]

n. 没收；征用；充公

复 数 c o n f i s c a t i o n s

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Contrabands and The Confiscation ACTS.

“禁运品”与《没收法》。

2.Failure to do so will also result in confiscation of our Bid Bond.

不这样做也将导致我们的投标保证金没收。

3.So there are some administrative sanction in civil law and regulations. Confiscation is such a sanction.

故在民事法律规范中对当事人的违法行为亦不乏行政制裁，收缴制度即为一类。

4.If the circumstances are especially serious, the offender shall be sentenced to death, and concurrently be sentenced to confiscation of property.

情节特别严重的，处死刑，并处没收财产。

5.Reasonable compensation is one of the important components of land confiscation.

合理的补偿是土地征收的重要构成要件。

6.In the meantime, capture should be distinguish from confiscation, capture fine and so on.

同时，收缴应与没收、收缴罚款等加以区分。

7."Confiscation" in the second paragraph includes the confiscation of money, material or other properties.

第二款所称没收，包括对货币、实物或其他财产的没收。

8.In the 1960s and 1970s, when interest rates crept steadily upwards and prices sagged, bonds were dubbed "certificates of confiscation".

20世纪60和70年代，利率平稳，物价下降，债券有个“没收凭证”的绰号。

9.The article tries to analyze the deficiency in the soil confiscation systems and to put forward the corresponding solution measures.

本文试图从这些方面分析土地征用制度的不足并提出相应的解决措施。

10.Students were warned about the confiscation of their phones if they used them during class.

学生们被警告，如果在课堂上使用手机，将会面临没收。

11.During the inspection, the customs officer ordered the confiscation of prohibited items.

在检查过程中，海关官员下令对禁止物品进行没收。

12.The confiscation of counterfeit goods is essential to protect consumers.

对假冒商品的没收对于保护消费者至关重要。

13.The government announced the confiscation of assets from corrupt officials.

政府宣布对腐败官员的资产进行没收。

14.The police conducted a raid that resulted in the confiscation of illegal firearms.

警方进行了一次突袭，导致了对非法枪支的没收。

作文

Confiscation is a term that refers to the act of taking someone's property, usually by a government or authority, without compensation. This process can occur for various reasons, such as legal violations, tax evasion, or public safety concerns. The implications of confiscation (没收) are significant, affecting not only the individual whose property is taken but also society as a whole. In many cases, confiscation (没收) is seen as a necessary tool for maintaining law and order, especially when it comes to illegal activities such as drug trafficking or organized crime. One of the most common forms of confiscation (没收) occurs in the context of law enforcement. For instance, if an individual is caught with illegal drugs, the police have the authority to seize those drugs as evidence. Additionally, any property that was used in the commission of a crime, such as a vehicle or weapon, can also be subject to confiscation (没收). This serves not only to punish the offender but also to deter others from engaging in similar illegal activities. However, confiscation (没收) raises important questions about fairness and justice. Critics argue that the process can be abused, leading to unjust seizures of property from innocent individuals. For example, in some jurisdictions, law enforcement agencies may have the power to confiscate (没收) assets without a criminal conviction, which can disproportionately affect marginalized communities. This practice, known as civil asset forfeiture, has sparked widespread debate and calls for reform. Moreover, the emotional and financial impact of confiscation (没收) on individuals cannot be understated. Losing one's property can lead to significant hardships, especially for those who rely on their belongings for their livelihood. In many cases, the process of recovering confiscated items can be lengthy and costly, further exacerbating the situation for affected individuals. In contrast, there are instances where confiscation (没收) is viewed positively. For example, during times of war or national emergency, governments may seize private property to serve the greater good. This can include repurposing buildings for military use or confiscating (没收) resources to ensure the survival of the population. While these actions may be controversial, they are often justified by the need to prioritize collective safety and security over individual rights. In conclusion, confiscation (没收) is a complex issue that encompasses legal, ethical, and social dimensions. It serves as a powerful tool for authorities to enforce laws and maintain order, yet it also poses risks of abuse and injustice. As society continues to grapple with the implications of confiscation (没收), it is crucial to strike a balance between effective law enforcement and the protection of individual rights. This ongoing dialogue will shape the future of how confiscation (没收) is implemented and perceived in our communities.

没收是一个术语，指的是通常由政府或权威机构在没有补偿的情况下夺取某人的财产的行为。这一过程可能出于各种原因，例如法律违规、逃税或公共安全问题。没收的影响是显著的，不仅影响被夺取财产的个人，也影响整个社会。在许多情况下，没收被视为维护法律和秩序的必要工具，特别是在涉及毒品贩运或有组织犯罪等非法活动时。最常见的没收发生在执法的背景下。例如，如果一个人被发现持有非法毒品，警方有权将这些毒品作为证据扣押。此外，任何在犯罪过程中使用的财产，例如车辆或武器，也可以被没收。这不仅是为了惩罚罪犯，也是为了威慑他人参与类似的非法活动。然而，没收引发了关于公平和正义的重要问题。批评者认为这一过程可能被滥用，导致无辜个人的不公正财产被夺取。例如，在一些管辖区，执法机构可能有权在没有刑事定罪的情况下没收资产，这可能对边缘化社区造成不成比例的影响。这种做法被称为民事资产没收，引发了广泛的辩论和改革呼声。此外，没收对个人的情感和经济影响不容小觑。失去财产可能导致重大困难，尤其是对于依赖其财物谋生的人来说。在许多情况下，追回被没收物品的过程可能漫长而昂贵，进一步加剧了受影响个人的困境。相反，也有一些情况下，没收被视为积极的。例如，在战争或国家紧急状态期间，政府可能会征用私人财产以服务于更大的利益。这可能包括将建筑物重新用于军事用途或没收资源以确保人口的生存。尽管这些行为可能具有争议性，但通常因为需要优先考虑集体安全和安保而得到合理化。总之，没收是一个复杂的问题，涵盖法律、伦理和社会层面。它作为当局执行法律和维护秩序的强大工具，同时也带来了滥用和不公正的风险。随着社会继续努力应对没收的影响，寻找有效执法与保护个人权利之间的平衡至关重要。这场持续的对话将塑造没收在我们社区中实施和感知的未来。