disaffirmance

简明释义

英[dɪsəfiːəˈmæns]美[dɪsəfiəˈmæns]

n. 废弃；否定

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.They withdrawed the notice and coupled with the disaffirmance of any opinion or document.

他们撤回了通知，并撤销了任何意见或文件。

2.They withdrawed the notice and coupled with the disaffirmance of any opinion or document.

他们撤回了通知，并撤销了任何意见或文件。

3.The concept of disaffirmance 撤销 is particularly important in contracts involving minors.

在涉及未成年人的合同中，disaffirmance 撤销的概念尤为重要。

4.After realizing the terms were unfair, she decided to proceed with her disaffirmance 撤销 of the agreement.

在意识到条款不公平后，她决定进行合同的disaffirmance 撤销。

5.The court ruled that the minor's disaffirmance 撤销 of the contract was valid.

法庭裁定未成年人的disaffirmance 撤销合同是有效的。

6.Her disaffirmance 撤销 of the lease agreement came after discovering hidden fees.

她在发现隐藏费用后对租赁协议进行了disaffirmance 撤销。

7.The attorney explained how disaffirmance 撤销 can protect consumers from unfair contracts.

律师解释了如何通过disaffirmance 撤销来保护消费者免受不公平合同的影响。

作文

In the realm of contract law, the concept of disaffirmance plays a crucial role in protecting the rights of parties who may have entered into agreements under certain conditions that render them vulnerable. The term disaffirmance refers to the act of rejecting or voiding a contract, allowing one party—often a minor or someone who was misled—to escape their obligations under the agreement. This legal principle is essential as it provides a safety net for individuals who might not fully understand the implications of their actions when entering into contracts. For instance, consider a scenario where a seventeen-year-old purchases a car. If the minor realizes that they were misinformed about the car's condition or value, they can invoke disaffirmance to cancel the contract. This process is not merely a matter of personal choice; it is enshrined in law to prevent exploitation and ensure that minors are not unduly burdened by decisions they might not be mature enough to make. The importance of disaffirmance extends beyond just protecting minors. It also applies to situations involving fraud, undue influence, or duress. When one party has been deceived into a contract through false representations, they can exercise their right to disaffirmance. This ensures that contracts are not enforced if they were formed under unethical circumstances. For example, if an individual is coerced into signing a contract due to threats or manipulation, they should have the ability to disaffirm that contract and seek legal recourse.Moreover, the concept of disaffirmance fosters fairness in contractual relationships. It acknowledges that not all parties enter agreements on equal footing. By allowing certain parties to disaffirm contracts, the law recognizes the inherent power imbalances that can exist in negotiations. This principle is particularly relevant in cases involving consumers versus businesses, where consumers may lack the knowledge or resources to fully understand the terms they are agreeing to. In addition to its protective functions, disaffirmance also serves as a deterrent against unscrupulous practices in business. Knowing that contracts can be disaffirmed in cases of deceit or coercion encourages companies to engage in fair dealings and uphold ethical standards. This, in turn, contributes to a healthier marketplace where trust and transparency are valued. However, it is important to note that the right to disaffirmance is not absolute. There are specific rules and timeframes within which a party must act to disaffirm a contract. For example, once a minor reaches the age of majority, they may lose the ability to disaffirm contracts made during their minority unless they take specific actions to do so. Similarly, if a party has ratified a contract after gaining knowledge of the grounds for disaffirmance, they may be barred from later claiming disaffirmance. In conclusion, the principle of disaffirmance is vital in ensuring fairness and justice within contractual agreements. It protects vulnerable parties from exploitation and reinforces the idea that contracts should be entered into willingly and with full understanding. As society continues to evolve, the application of disaffirmance will undoubtedly adapt to meet new challenges, but its core purpose will remain: to uphold the integrity of contractual relationships and safeguard the rights of individuals. Understanding the nuances of disaffirmance is essential for anyone engaged in contractual agreements, whether as a consumer, business owner, or legal professional. By recognizing when and how disaffirmance can be applied, individuals can better navigate the complexities of contract law and protect their interests effectively.

在合同法的领域中，disaffirmance的概念在保护可能在某些条件下进入协议的当事人权益方面发挥着至关重要的作用。术语disaffirmance指的是拒绝或撤销合同的行为，允许一方——通常是未成年人或被误导的人——逃避其在协议下的义务。这个法律原则至关重要，因为它为那些在签订合同时可能没有完全理解自己行为含义的个人提供了安全网。 例如，考虑一个十七岁少年购买汽车的情景。如果未成年人意识到他们被误导了汽车的状况或价值，他们可以援引disaffirmance来取消合同。这个过程不仅仅是个人选择的问题；它被法律所规定，以防止剥削，并确保未成年人不被不当负担。 disaffirmance的重要性不仅限于保护未成年人。它还适用于涉及欺诈、过度影响或胁迫的情况。当一方因虚假陈述而被欺骗签订合同时，他们可以行使自己的disaffirmance权利。这确保了如果合同是在不道德的情况下形成的，就不会被强制执行。例如，如果一个人因威胁或操控被迫签署合同，他们应该有能力撤销该合同并寻求法律救济。 此外，disaffirmance的概念促进了合同关系中的公平性。它承认并非所有当事人在谈判中处于平等地位。通过允许某些当事人撤销合同，法律承认了谈判中可能存在的固有权力不平衡。这一原则在消费者与企业之间的案例中特别相关，因为消费者可能缺乏充分理解他们所同意条款的知识或资源。 除了其保护功能外，disaffirmance还作为对不道德商业行为的威慑。知道在欺诈或胁迫情况下合同可以被撤销，促使公司进行公平交易并维护道德标准。这反过来又促进了一个更加健康的市场环境，在这里信任和透明度被重视。 然而，重要的是要注意，撤销权并不是绝对的。有特定的规则和时间框架，规定当事人必须在其中采取行动以撤销合同。例如，一旦未成年人达到法定年龄，他们可能会失去在未成年期间撤销合同的能力，除非他们采取特定措施。此外，如果一方在得知撤销理由后确认了合同，他们可能会被禁止后来主张disaffirmance。 总之，disaffirmance原则在确保合同协议中的公平和正义方面至关重要。它保护脆弱的一方免受剥削，并强化了合同应自愿签订并充分理解的理念。随着社会的不断发展，disaffirmance的应用无疑会适应新挑战，但其核心目的将保持不变：维护合同关系的完整性并保护个人的权利。 理解disaffirmance的细微差别对于任何参与合同协议的人来说都是至关重要的，无论是作为消费者、企业主还是法律专业人士。通过认识到何时以及如何适用disaffirmance，个人可以更好地驾驭合同法的复杂性，有效保护自己的利益。