crimination
简明释义
n. 控告;责备;证明有罪
英英释义
The act of accusing or blaming someone for a crime or wrongdoing. | 指控或责备某人犯罪或不当行为的行为。 |
对某人提出正式指控的过程。 |
单词用法
自我归罪 | |
刑事指控 | |
避免指控 | |
指控某人 |
同义词
指控 | 对他的指控被证明是错误的。 | ||
起诉 | 起诉书由大陪审团提出。 | ||
责备 | 她对事件感到了一种责任感。 | ||
指控 | 他面临与欺诈有关的严重指控。 | ||
指控 | 对不当行为的指控进行了彻底调查。 |
反义词
免罪 | The court granted him exoneration after new evidence was presented. | 在新证据被提出后,法院给予了他免罪。 | |
赦免 | 她寻求对自己过去错误的赦免。 |
例句
1.In addition, the crimination of negligent dangerous ACTS can only exist in the crime of endangering public safety, and the principle of criminal restrain must be followed to set up the penalty.
另外,过失危险行为犯罪化只应存在于危害公共安全的犯罪中,在设置刑罚时应遵循谦抑原则。
2.The acknowledgement of continuous offence is taken as a distortion to continuous offence, as regulated by item 89 of lawsuit limitation of legal proceedings in crimination law of our nation.
刑法理论通说基于我国刑法第89条追诉时效的规定,认为我国刑法中承认连续犯的观点,是对连续犯的一种曲解。
3.Both the privilege against self-crimination of tainted witness and the principle of balancing interests in practice are the theoretical foundation of immunity to tainted witness.
污点证人的不受强迫自证其罪权和实践中的利益权衡原则是污点证人豁免的理论基础。
4.In addition, the crimination of negligent dangerous ACTS can only exist in the crime of endangering public safety, and the principle of criminal restrain must be followed to set up the penalty.
另外,过失危险行为犯罪化只应存在于危害公共安全的犯罪中,在设置刑罚时应遵循谦抑原则。
5.The lawyer argued that there was no evidence of crimination 指控 against his client.
律师辩称,没有针对其客户的指控的证据。
6.During the trial, the prosecution failed to establish clear crimination 指控 against the defendant.
在审判过程中,检方未能对被告建立明确的指控。
7.The committee found no crimination 指控 in the allegations made by the whistleblower.
委员会发现举报者提出的指控中没有指控。
8.Her testimony was crucial in avoiding any crimination 指控 against the innocent party.
她的证词在避免对无辜方的任何指控方面至关重要。
9.The investigation revealed potential crimination 指控 among the suspects.
调查揭示了嫌疑人之间可能存在的指控。
作文
The concept of crimination is often misunderstood in the context of legal and social discussions. In essence, crimination refers to the act of accusing someone of a crime or wrongdoing. This term is derived from the Latin word 'criminari,' which means 'to accuse.' It plays a crucial role in the justice system, where accusations can lead to investigations, trials, and ultimately, judgments about guilt or innocence. However, the implications of crimination extend beyond the courtroom and into everyday life, affecting personal relationships, social dynamics, and community interactions.In many cases, crimination is a necessary component of maintaining law and order. When individuals witness a crime, they have a moral and legal obligation to report it. This act of reporting is a form of crimination, as it involves naming the perpetrator and bringing their actions to light. Without such actions, society would struggle to hold individuals accountable for their behavior, leading to a breakdown of trust and safety within communities.However, crimination can also have negative connotations. False accusations can destroy lives, reputations, and relationships. For instance, when someone is wrongfully accused of a crime, they may face social ostracism and emotional distress, regardless of the outcome of any legal proceedings. This highlights the importance of ensuring that crimination is based on credible evidence and not merely on suspicion or hearsay. The principle of 'innocent until proven guilty' is foundational in many legal systems, emphasizing the need for careful consideration before making accusations.Moreover, crimination can occur in various contexts outside of criminal law. In workplace environments, for example, accusations of misconduct can lead to investigations that might affect an employee's career and mental health. In these situations, crimination can create a toxic atmosphere, where individuals feel anxious about being falsely accused or unfairly judged. Therefore, it is crucial for organizations to foster a culture of transparency and fairness, allowing for concerns to be raised without fear of unjust crimination.Social media has also changed the landscape of crimination. With the rise of online platforms, accusations can spread rapidly, often without proper verification. A single post can lead to widespread public outcry and significant consequences for the accused, even if the claims are unfounded. This phenomenon raises questions about the ethics of online crimination and the responsibilities of individuals when sharing information. It is vital for users to consider the potential impact of their words and to seek truth before participating in the cycle of accusation.In conclusion, crimination is a complex and multifaceted term that carries both weight and responsibility. While it is essential for upholding justice and accountability, it also necessitates caution and integrity. As members of society, we must navigate the fine line between speaking out against wrongdoing and ensuring that our actions do not lead to harm through false accusations. Understanding the nuances of crimination can empower us to engage in more thoughtful and constructive dialogues, fostering a safer and more just community for everyone.
“指控”这个概念在法律和社会讨论中常常被误解。实际上,指控是指控某人犯罪或不当行为的行为。这个词源于拉丁词“criminari”,意思是“指控”。它在司法系统中扮演着至关重要的角色,指控可以导致调查、审判,以及最终对有罪或无罪的判断。然而,指控的影响超越了法庭,深入到日常生活中,影响着个人关系、社会动态和社区互动。在许多情况下,指控是维护法律和秩序的必要组成部分。当个人目睹犯罪时,他们有道德和法律上的义务报告。这种报告行为是一种指控,因为它涉及到指认肇事者并揭露他们的行为。如果没有这样的行为,社会将难以让个人对其行为负责,从而导致社区信任和安全感的崩溃。然而,指控也可能带有负面含义。虚假指控可能摧毁生命、名誉和关系。例如,当某人被错误指控犯罪时,无论任何法律程序的结果如何,他们可能会面临社会排斥和情感困扰。这突显了确保指控基于可信证据的重要性,而不仅仅是基于怀疑或传闻。“无罪推定”的原则在许多法律系统中是基础,强调在做出指控之前需要仔细考虑。此外,指控还可以在刑法之外的各种背景中发生。例如,在职场环境中,对不当行为的指控可能导致调查,这可能影响员工的职业生涯和心理健康。在这些情况下,指控可能会造成有毒的氛围,使个人对被错误指控或不公正评判感到焦虑。因此,组织必须培养透明和公平的文化,允许提出担忧而不必担心不公正的指控。社交媒体也改变了指控的格局。随着在线平台的兴起,指控可以迅速传播,往往没有经过适当验证。一条帖子可能导致广泛的公众愤怒,并对被指控者产生重大后果,即使这些指控是毫无根据的。这一现象引发了关于在线指控伦理及个人在分享信息时的责任的问题。用户必须考虑他们言辞的潜在影响,并在参与指控循环之前寻求真相。总之,指控是一个复杂而多面的术语,承载着重大的责任。虽然它对于维护正义和问责至关重要,但它也需要谨慎和诚信。作为社会的一员,我们必须在揭发不当行为与确保我们的行为不会通过虚假指控造成伤害之间走好微妙的界限。理解指控的细微差别可以使我们能够参与更深思熟虑和建设性的对话,为每个人营造一个更安全、更公正的社区。