paramilitary

简明释义

英[ˌpærəˈmɪlətri]美[ˌpærəˈmɪləteri]

adj. 准军事的；辅助军事的

n. 准军事部队

复 数 p a r a m i l i t a r i e s

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.One might say that these paramilitary groups were running a privatized version of the tax system we all know too well.

有人也许会说这些准军事组织运行的是一种我们熟知的税制。

2.Now even those once considered dangerous will have a say on how the remaining paramilitary rumps are dealt with.

现在那些一度被认为是危险分子的人，在如何处理残余的武装力量问题上也获得了发言权。

3.His views had become increasingly extreme in recent years and he had been seen by neighbours wearing paramilitary uniform.

近年来他变得越来越极端，邻居说看过他穿着非法军事组织的军服。

4.Searches by the army and paramilitary forces have continued today.

军队和准军事部队的搜索今天仍然继续着。

5.The 20,000 well-trained tribal paramilitary forces that the Colonel most relies on May feel they have no alternative.

上校最倚重的两万名训练有素的部族民兵可能认为他们是别无选择。

6.More than 80, 000 soldiers and nearly 400, 000 police and paramilitary forces are providing security for the polls.

在各投票站，8万多名军人和将近40万名警察和准军事人员担任警戒。

7.I will not let anyone, any paramilitary or civil organisation, replace the police.

我不会让任何人，任何准军事机构或者民间组织取代警察的职责。

8.The soldiers were deployed to help paramilitary police seal the border.

这些士兵们被调去协助准军事警察封锁边境。

9.Many countries have struggled with the rise of paramilitary 准军事组织 that operate outside the law.

许多国家在与在法律之外运作的<帮派>准军事组织的崛起斗争。

10.Some regions have seen the emergence of paramilitary 准军事组织 as a response to government failure.

一些地区出现了<帮派>准军事组织，以回应政府的失职。

11.The paramilitary 准军事组织 was involved in various violent conflicts during the civil war.

在内战期间，该<帮派>准军事组织参与了多次暴力冲突。

12.The paramilitary 准军事组织 conducted operations without official military oversight.

该<帮派>准军事组织在没有官方军事监督的情况下进行行动。

13.The government has been accused of supporting paramilitary 准军事组织 groups to suppress dissent.

政府被指控支持<帮派>准军事组织以压制异议。

作文

The term paramilitary refers to groups that are organized similarly to military forces but do not have the official status of a military organization. These groups can be found in various contexts around the world, often operating alongside or in opposition to formal military units. The existence and function of paramilitary organizations raise complex questions about governance, security, and human rights. In many countries, paramilitary groups emerge in response to perceived threats to national security or social order. For instance, during periods of civil unrest or conflict, these groups may form to protect specific communities or interests. They can also serve as a tool for governments seeking to exert control over certain regions without deploying regular military forces. However, the line between legitimate defense and unlawful violence can become blurred, leading to significant consequences for civilians caught in the crossfire.One notable example of a paramilitary organization is the Irish Republican Army (IRA), which operated in Northern Ireland during the late 20th century. The IRA sought to end British rule in Northern Ireland and reunify Ireland, often using violent tactics to achieve its goals. This situation illustrates how paramilitary groups can be both a product of political struggles and a catalyst for further violence. In other regions, such as Latin America, paramilitary groups have been associated with drug trafficking and organized crime. These organizations often fill power vacuums left by weak or corrupt governments, leading to a cycle of violence and instability. The rise of such groups poses a challenge for law enforcement and military officials, who must navigate the complicated dynamics of fighting against entities that operate outside of traditional legal frameworks.The impact of paramilitary groups extends beyond immediate violence. They can undermine trust in government institutions and contribute to a culture of fear and repression. In some cases, paramilitary organizations may engage in human rights abuses, targeting specific populations based on ethnicity, political beliefs, or social status. This has led to international condemnation and calls for accountability from those who perpetrate such acts.Despite their controversial nature, paramilitary groups can also play a role in community defense. In areas where state security forces are ineffective or absent, local populations may turn to these organizations for protection. This reliance can create a paradox, where communities feel safer in the short term but may ultimately suffer from the long-term consequences of supporting armed groups.In conclusion, the concept of paramilitary organizations is multifaceted and often contentious. They can arise from genuine community needs for security and protection, yet they can also lead to increased violence and instability. Understanding the dynamics of paramilitary groups requires a nuanced approach that considers historical, political, and social factors. As societies continue to grapple with issues of security and governance, the role of paramilitary organizations will remain a critical area of study and debate. Ultimately, addressing the challenges posed by paramilitary groups involves not only military solutions but also efforts to strengthen governance, promote human rights, and foster dialogue among conflicting parties.

‘paramilitary’一词指的是组织形式与军事力量相似但没有正式军事组织地位的团体。这些团体可以在世界各地找到，通常与正规军事单位并行或对立。‘paramilitary’组织的存在和功能引发了关于治理、安全和人权的复杂问题。在许多国家，‘paramilitary’团体是对国家安全或社会秩序感知威胁的反应。例如，在内乱或冲突期间，这些团体可能会形成，以保护特定社区或利益。它们也可以作为政府试图在不部署正规军队的情况下控制某些地区的工具。然而，合法防御和非法暴力之间的界限可能会变得模糊，导致平民在交火中遭受重大后果。一个显著的‘paramilitary’组织例子是爱尔兰共和军（IRA），该组织在20世纪晚期于北爱尔兰活动。IRA寻求结束英国对北爱尔兰的统治，并实现爱尔兰的统一，常常使用暴力手段来实现其目标。这种情况说明了‘paramilitary’团体既可以是政治斗争的产物，也可以是进一步暴力的催化剂。在拉丁美洲等其他地区，‘paramilitary’组织与毒品贩运和有组织犯罪有关。这些组织通常填补由于政府虚弱或腐败而留下的权力真空，导致暴力和不稳定的循环。这类团体的崛起对执法和军事官员提出了挑战，他们必须驾驭与那些在传统法律框架外运作的实体作斗争的复杂动态。‘paramilitary’团体的影响超越了直接的暴力。它们可能削弱对政府机构的信任，并助长恐惧和压迫的文化。在某些情况下，‘paramilitary’组织可能参与人权侵犯，针对特定人群进行攻击，基于种族、政治信仰或社会地位。这导致国际谴责和对施害者追究责任的呼声。尽管存在争议，‘paramilitary’团体在社区防卫中也可能发挥作用。在国家安全部队无效或缺席的地区，当地居民可能会转向这些组织以获得保护。这种依赖可能造成悖论，即社区在短期内感觉更安全，但最终可能因支持武装团体而遭受长期后果。总之，‘paramilitary’组织的概念是多方面的，往往充满争议。它们可能源于社区对安全和保护的真正需求，但也可能导致暴力和不稳定的增加。理解‘paramilitary’团体的动态需要一种细致入微的方法，考虑历史、政治和社会因素。随着社会继续应对安全和治理问题，‘paramilitary’组织的角色将仍然是研究和辩论的关键领域。最终，解决‘paramilitary’团体带来的挑战不仅需要军事解决方案，还需要加强治理、促进人权和推动冲突各方之间的对话。