confrontational

简明释义

英[ˌkɒnfrʌnˈteɪʃənl]美[ˌkɑːnfrənˈteɪʃənl]

adj. 对抗的；对抗性的

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.We reiterate that such cooperation is inclusive and non-confrontational.

我们重申这种合作是包容的、非对抗性的。

2.As Ms Casanova says, the Californian system was designed to be "confrontational".

正如Casanova女士所说，加州的体制就是用以对抗的。

3.Taking executives hostage is a well-established tactic in France, which has a history of confrontational Labour relations.

在法国，扣押行政人员是一种惯用的方法，这源自于对立冲突的劳资关系。

4.Sata's campaign this year was only slightly less confrontational.

今年，Sata的竞选活动对抗意识稍微减轻了一些。

5.This is not a time to get confrontational with your partner, and vice versa.

这不是一个需要对你的伴侣有对抗心理的时间，同样也不是让你的陋习施展的时间。

6.I also learned non-confrontational phrases to use in conversation, such as prefacing a statement with "In my opinion."

同时我也学会了与人交谈的时候，可以运用非对抗性语言，譬如在陈述一个观点时加上“依我看来”。

7.I know none of this sounds excitingly confrontational.

我知道以上内容并没有显出激烈对抗的意味。

8.She has a confrontational attitude when discussing sensitive topics.

她在讨论敏感话题时态度很对抗性。

9.His confrontational approach made it difficult to resolve the conflict peacefully.

他那种对抗性的方式使得冲突难以和平解决。

10.The teacher addressed the student's confrontational behavior in class.

老师在课堂上处理了学生的对抗性行为。

11.His confrontational style often leads to heated arguments during meetings.

他那种对抗性的风格常常导致会议上激烈的争论。

12.In a confrontational negotiation, both sides may refuse to compromise.

在对抗性的谈判中，双方可能都拒绝妥协。

作文

In today's world, we often encounter various types of communication styles among individuals. One of the most notable styles is the confrontational style. This approach can be both beneficial and detrimental, depending on the context in which it is used. A confrontational individual tends to address issues head-on, often leading to intense discussions or arguments. While this can sometimes lead to resolution and clarity, it can also escalate conflicts and create a hostile environment.To understand the implications of a confrontational communication style, it is essential to consider its effects on relationships. For instance, in a workplace setting, a confrontational approach may be necessary when addressing performance issues or conflicts among team members. By tackling problems directly, employees can foster an atmosphere of openness and honesty. However, if taken too far, this style can alienate colleagues and lead to a breakdown in teamwork. Moreover, in personal relationships, being confrontational can have similar consequences. When one partner consistently adopts a confrontational stance during disagreements, it can result in feelings of resentment and frustration. While it is crucial to express one's feelings and concerns, the manner in which these issues are presented matters greatly. A more diplomatic approach may yield better outcomes, promoting understanding rather than conflict.The effectiveness of a confrontational style also varies based on cultural contexts. In some cultures, direct confrontation is seen as a sign of strength and honesty, while in others, it may be viewed as disrespectful or aggressive. Hence, individuals must be aware of their audience and adjust their communication style accordingly. Understanding when to be confrontational and when to adopt a more conciliatory approach is a valuable skill that can enhance interpersonal interactions.Additionally, the role of emotional intelligence cannot be overlooked when discussing confrontational behavior. Individuals with high emotional intelligence are often able to navigate conflicts more effectively, recognizing when to confront issues and when to step back. They understand that not all situations require a confrontational approach and that sometimes, listening and empathy can lead to more productive outcomes.In conclusion, while a confrontational communication style can be useful in certain situations, it is crucial to exercise caution and discernment. Balancing directness with sensitivity can help maintain healthy relationships, whether in professional or personal contexts. Ultimately, the key lies in knowing when to be confrontational and when to adopt a more measured approach. This awareness can lead to more effective communication, fostering an environment where issues can be resolved constructively rather than escalating into unnecessary conflicts.

在当今世界，我们常常会遇到个人之间各种类型的沟通风格。其中最显著的一种风格就是对抗性的风格。这种方式在使用的上下文中可以是有益的，也可能是有害的。一个对抗性的人倾向于直面问题，往往导致激烈的讨论或争论。虽然这有时可以带来解决方案和清晰度，但也可能会升级冲突并创造敌对环境。要理解对抗性沟通风格的影响，必须考虑其对人际关系的影响。例如，在工作场所，当涉及到表现问题或团队成员之间的冲突时，对抗性的方法可能是必要的。通过直接处理问题，员工可以培养开放和诚实的氛围。然而，如果过于激进，这种风格可能会使同事感到疏远，并导致团队合作的破裂。此外，在个人关系中，采取对抗性态度也可能产生类似的后果。当一方在争执中始终采取对抗性立场时，可能会导致怨恨和挫败感。虽然表达自己的感受和关切至关重要，但这些问题呈现的方式也非常重要。更具外交手腕的方法可能会产生更好的结果，促进理解而非冲突。对抗性风格的有效性还因文化背景而异。在某些文化中，直接对抗被视为一种力量和诚实的象征，而在其他文化中，它可能被视为不尊重或攻击。因此，个人必须意识到他们的受众，并相应地调整他们的沟通风格。了解何时采取对抗性态度以及何时采用更和解的方法是一项宝贵的技能，可以增强人际互动。此外，在讨论对抗性行为时，情商的作用不可忽视。情商高的个人通常能够更有效地处理冲突，认识到何时需要对抗问题，何时需要退一步。他们明白，并非所有情况都需要对抗性的方法，有时倾听和同理心可以带来更有成效的结果。总之，尽管在某些情况下，对抗性沟通风格可能是有用的，但谨慎和辨别是至关重要的。将直接性与敏感性平衡起来可以帮助维持健康的人际关系，无论是在专业还是个人的环境中。最终，关键在于知道何时采取对抗性态度，何时采取更温和的方法。这种意识可以导致更有效的沟通，营造出一个可以建设性地解决问题而不是升级为不必要冲突的环境。