bowdlerized

简明释义

英[ˈbaʊdləraɪz]美[ˈbaʊdləraɪz]

vt. 删改；删除不妥的文句

第 三 人 称 单 数 b o w d l e r i z e s

现 在 分 词 b o w d l e r i z i n g

过 去 式 b o w d l e r i z e d

过 去 分 词 b o w d l e r i z e d

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.I didn't want to see that playground bowdlerized. I said that as long as I was parks commissioner, those monkey bars were going to stay.

我不想看到删减的操场，只要我还是操场管理专员，猴架就要保留。

2.I didn't want to see that playground bowdlerized. I said that as long as I was parks commissioner, those monkey bars were going to stay.

我不想看到删减的操场，只要我还是操场管理专员，猴架就要保留。

3.The old format of most of the collected books was changed and the original texts of them were also bowdlerized.

对收入《四库全书》的图书，许多变乱旧式、删改原文。

4.Some classic literature has been bowdlerized to remove offensive language.

一些经典文学作品已经被删减过以去除冒犯性语言。

5.The bowdlerized edition of the play omitted several key scenes.

该剧的删减版省略了几个关键场景。

6.Many parents prefer bowdlerized children's books that are more suitable for their kids.

许多父母更喜欢适合他们孩子的删减过的儿童书籍。

7.The teacher decided to use a bowdlerized version of the novel for the younger students.

老师决定为年轻学生使用一个删减过的小说版本。

8.The film adaptation was criticized for being too bowdlerized compared to the original story.

这部电影改编版因与原故事相比过于删减而受到批评。

作文

In the realm of literature and media, the concept of censorship often sparks heated debates. One term that frequently arises in these discussions is bowdlerized, which refers to the act of removing or altering content deemed inappropriate or offensive, particularly in literary works. The term originates from Thomas Bowdler, who published an expurgated version of Shakespeare's plays in the early 19th century, aiming to make them more suitable for women and children. While his intentions may have been noble, the practice of bowdlerizing texts raises important questions about artistic integrity and the role of context in understanding literature.When we consider the implications of bowdlerization, it becomes clear that this practice can significantly alter the original message of a work. For instance, classic novels like "Huckleberry Finn" by Mark Twain have faced bowdlerization due to their use of racially charged language and themes. While some argue that removing such elements makes the text more accessible to modern readers, others contend that it strips away the historical context and the author's intended commentary on society. This leads us to ponder: does bowdlerizing a text enhance its value, or does it diminish the richness of the narrative?Furthermore, the digital age has introduced new challenges regarding bowdlerization. With the rise of social media and online platforms, content creators often face pressure to conform to societal norms and avoid controversial topics. As a result, many works are bowdlerized before they even reach the public eye. This trend can lead to a homogenization of ideas, where only the most palatable versions of stories are shared, ultimately stifling creativity and critical thought.Moreover, the impact of bowdlerization extends beyond literature; it permeates film, television, and even educational materials. Movies that tackle sensitive subjects may be edited to remove explicit scenes or language, resulting in a version that fails to convey the original emotional weight. Similarly, textbooks may bowdlerize historical events to present a sanitized version of reality, thereby depriving students of a comprehensive understanding of their past.In conclusion, while the practice of bowdlerizing content may stem from a desire to protect certain audiences, it ultimately raises critical issues about freedom of expression and the preservation of artistic integrity. As consumers of media, we must remain vigilant and question the motivations behind bowdlerization. By doing so, we can foster a more nuanced appreciation for literature and the arts, recognizing that discomfort can often lead to deeper understanding and growth. Therefore, rather than shying away from challenging material, we should embrace it, allowing ourselves to grapple with the complexities of human experience without the constraints of bowdlerization.

在文学和媒体的领域，审查制度的概念常常引发激烈的辩论。一个经常出现在这些讨论中的术语是bowdlerized，它指的是删除或更改被认为不适当或冒犯内容的行为，特别是在文学作品中。这个术语源于托马斯·博德勒，他在19世纪初出版了莎士比亚戏剧的删节版，旨在使其更适合女性和儿童。虽然他的意图可能是高尚的，但bowdlerizing文本的做法引发了关于艺术完整性和理解文学时上下文作用的重要问题。当我们考虑bowdlerization的影响时，很明显，这种做法可以显著改变作品的原始信息。例如，像马克·吐温的《哈克贝里·费恩历险记》这样的经典小说由于使用种族主义语言和主题而面临bowdlerization。虽然一些人认为去除这些元素使文本对现代读者更易于接触，但另一些人则认为这剥夺了历史背景和作者对社会的意图评论。这让我们思考：bowdlerizing文本是增强其价值，还是削弱叙事的丰富性？此外，数字时代带来了关于bowdlerization的新挑战。随着社交媒体和在线平台的兴起，内容创作者常常面临压力，要求遵循社会规范，避免争议话题。因此，许多作品在到达公众视野之前就被bowdlerized。这一趋势可能导致思想的同质化，只有最可口的故事版本被分享，最终扼杀创造力和批判性思维。此外，bowdlerization的影响超越了文学；它渗透到电影、电视甚至教育材料中。处理敏感主题的电影可能会被编辑以删除露骨场景或语言，导致一个未能传达原始情感重量的版本。同样，教科书可能会bowdlerize历史事件，以呈现一个经过消毒的现实版本，从而剥夺学生对过去全面理解的机会。总之，虽然bowdlerizing内容的做法可能源于保护某些观众的愿望，但它最终引发了关于言论自由和艺术完整性保护的关键问题。作为媒体的消费者，我们必须保持警惕，质疑bowdlerization背后的动机。通过这样做，我们可以培养对文学和艺术更细致的欣赏，认识到不适感往往可以带来更深的理解和成长。因此，与其回避具有挑战性的材料，我们应该拥抱它，让自己在没有bowdlerization限制的情况下，与人类经验的复杂性进行斗争。