jejunely

简明释义

[dʒɪˈdʒuːnli][dʒəˈdʒunli]

adv. 缺乏营养地;幼稚地;枯燥地

英英释义

In a manner that is simplistic or superficial; lacking in depth or substance.

以简单或肤浅的方式;缺乏深度或实质。

单词用法

speak jejunely

无趣地说

write jejunely

无趣地写

jejunely simplistic

过于简单的

jejunely presented

呈现得很乏味的

同义词

naively

天真地

She viewed the world naively, believing everyone had good intentions.

她天真地看待世界,相信每个人都有善意。

simplistically

简单地

His argument was presented simplistically, ignoring the complexities of the issue.

他的论点简单地呈现,忽视了问题的复杂性。

uninformedly

无知地

They approached the problem uninformedly, lacking any prior research.

他们无知地处理这个问题,没有任何事先的研究。

反义词

richly

丰富地

The story was richly detailed and kept the audience engaged.

这个故事细节丰富,让观众保持了兴趣。

vividly

生动地

She described the scene vividly, painting a clear picture in our minds.

她生动地描述了场景,在我们脑海中勾勒出清晰的画面。

interestingly

有趣地

He spoke interestingly about his travels, capturing everyone's attention.

他有趣地讲述了他的旅行,吸引了所有人的注意。

例句

1.He responded to the complex question in a jejunely simplistic manner.

他用一种过于简单的方式回答了这个复杂的问题。

2.The movie's plot was developed jejunely, leaving many viewers disappointed.

这部电影的情节发展单薄无力,让许多观众感到失望。

3.The presentation was delivered so jejunely that the audience struggled to stay engaged.

演示内容显得如此贫乏无味,以至于观众很难保持兴趣。

4.Her jejunely written report failed to impress the committee.

她那份简陋无趣的报告未能给委员会留下深刻印象。

5.Her jejunely expressed opinions did not contribute to the discussion.

她那肤浅无聊的意见对讨论没有任何贡献。

作文

In the realm of literature, the way a story is told can significantly impact its reception. A writer's ability to convey emotions and themes can elevate a simple narrative into a profound experience. However, there are instances where narratives fall flat, lacking depth and engagement. This is often the result of presenting ideas too jejunely, or in a way that is simplistic and uninspired. When a story is told in such a manner, it may fail to resonate with readers, leaving them feeling unfulfilled and disconnected. For example, consider a novel that attempts to tackle complex themes such as love, loss, and redemption. If the author approaches these themes too jejunely, merely skimming the surface without delving into the emotional intricacies involved, the result can be disappointing. Readers may find themselves asking, "Where is the depth? Where is the emotional pull?" This lack of substance can render even the most compelling plot mundane. Moreover, the dialogue in a story can also contribute to its overall impact. Characters who speak in a jejunely manner, using clichéd phrases or lacking genuine emotion, can make the narrative feel lifeless. Authenticity in dialogue is crucial; it brings characters to life and allows readers to connect with them on a deeper level. When characters express themselves in a way that feels forced or overly simplistic, it detracts from the overall experience. Additionally, the pacing of a story can influence how effectively it engages an audience. A narrative that rushes through significant events without adequate exploration often comes across as jejunely presented. Readers appreciate moments of reflection, character development, and tension buildup. When these elements are neglected, the story can feel rushed and superficial, leading to a lack of investment in the characters' journeys. On the other hand, when writers take the time to explore their themes and develop their characters fully, the resulting work is often rich and rewarding. A narrative that embraces complexity and nuance invites readers to engage actively with the text, fostering a connection that transcends mere entertainment. Such works encourage readers to reflect on their own experiences and emotions, creating a lasting impact. In conclusion, the way stories are crafted plays a pivotal role in their effectiveness. When narratives are delivered too jejunely, they risk alienating their audience and failing to leave a mark. Writers must strive to infuse their work with depth, authenticity, and emotional resonance. By doing so, they can create stories that not only entertain but also provoke thought and evoke feelings, ultimately enriching the reader's experience. The challenge lies in balancing simplicity with complexity, ensuring that the narrative remains accessible while also being profound. Only then can literature truly thrive and touch the hearts of its readers.

在文学领域,故事的叙述方式会显著影响其接受程度。作家传达情感和主题的能力可以将一个简单的叙述提升为一种深刻的体验。然而,有时叙述会显得平淡无奇,缺乏深度和吸引力。这通常是因为以过于jejunely(简单而无趣的)方式呈现思想。当一个故事以这种方式讲述时,它可能无法引起读者的共鸣,使他们感到不满足和疏离。例如,考虑一本试图探讨复杂主题如爱、失落和救赎的小说。如果作者以过于jejunely的方式处理这些主题,仅仅浮于表面而不深入探讨情感的复杂性,结果可能会令人失望。读者可能会问:“深度在哪里?情感的牵引力在哪里?”这种缺乏实质的表现可能使即使是最引人入胜的情节也变得平淡无奇。此外,故事中的对话也会影响其整体效果。以jejunely(简单而无趣的)方式说话的角色,使用陈词滥调或缺乏真实情感,可能使叙述显得无生气。对话的真实性至关重要;它使角色栩栩如生,并允许读者与他们建立更深层次的联系。当角色以一种感觉被迫或过于简单的方式表达自己时,这会削弱整体体验。此外,故事的节奏也会影响其有效性。一种急于通过重要事件而没有充分探索的叙述往往显得jejunely。读者欣赏反思的时刻、角色的发展和紧张局势的建立。当这些元素被忽视时,故事可能会显得仓促和肤浅,导致对角色旅程的投资不足。另一方面,当作家花时间全面探索他们的主题并发展他们的角色时,所产生的作品通常丰富而有意义。一个拥抱复杂性和细微差别的叙述邀请读者积极参与文本,培养超越单纯娱乐的联系。这类作品鼓励读者反思自己的经历和情感,从而创造持久的影响。总之,故事的创作方式在其有效性中发挥着关键作用。当叙述过于jejunely时,它们有可能疏远观众并未能留下深刻印象。作家必须努力使他们的作品充满深度、真实性和情感共鸣。通过这样做,他们可以创造出不仅仅是娱乐而且能够引发思考和唤起情感的故事,最终丰富读者的体验。挑战在于平衡简约与复杂,确保叙述既保持可接近性又富有深度。只有这样,文学才能真正蓬勃发展并触动读者的心灵。