pantisocracy

简明释义

英[ˌpæntɪˈsɒkrəsi]美[ˌpæntɪˈsɑːkrəsi]

n. 理想的平等社会；万民同权政体；大同世界

复 数 p a n t i s o c r a c i e s

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.He described in detail his hopes for pantisocracy.

他详细描述了他对大同世界的希望。

2.He described in detail his hopes for pantisocracy.

他详细描述了他对大同世界的希望。

3.The idea of pantisocracy was popular among certain literary circles in the 19th century.

在19世纪，pantisocracy的理念在某些文学圈中很受欢迎。

4.The philosopher proposed a new form of government called pantisocracy, which emphasizes equal power for all citizens.

这位哲学家提出了一种新的政府形式，称为pantisocracy，强调所有公民的权力平等。

5.In their utopian vision, the authors imagined a society governed by pantisocracy, where everyone had a say in decisions.

在他们的乌托邦愿景中，作者们设想了一个由pantisocracy统治的社会，每个人都能参与决策。

6.Many activists advocate for a pantisocracy as a solution to political corruption.

许多活动人士提倡将pantisocracy作为解决政治腐败的方案。

7.The concept of pantisocracy is often discussed in the context of social justice and equality.

在社会正义和公平的背景下，pantisocracy的概念经常被讨论。

作文

In the realm of political philosophy, the term pantisocracy refers to a system of government in which all members of society have equal power and influence in decision-making. This concept was notably advocated by poets Samuel Taylor Coleridge and Robert Southey in the early 19th century as they envisioned a utopian society where everyone would participate equally in governance. The term itself is derived from the Greek words 'pan,' meaning 'all,' and 'isos,' meaning 'equal,' thus embodying the essence of equality in governance. The idea of pantisocracy emerged during a time of great social and political upheaval in Europe. The Industrial Revolution was transforming societies, leading to increased disparities between the rich and the poor. Coleridge and Southey sought to address these inequalities through their proposed model of governance. They believed that a pantisocracy would eliminate the hierarchical structures that often led to oppression and injustice. In their vision, every individual would have a voice, and decisions would be made collectively, ensuring that no single entity could dominate or exploit others.However, the practical implementation of pantisocracy poses significant challenges. While the ideal of equality is appealing, achieving true equality in governance requires overcoming deeply ingrained societal norms and power dynamics. For instance, how would a pantisocracy handle disagreements? In a system where everyone's opinion is valued equally, the potential for conflict increases. Additionally, the question arises: would all individuals possess the necessary knowledge and skills to make informed decisions on complex issues?Despite these challenges, the notion of pantisocracy continues to resonate in contemporary discussions about democracy and social justice. Many modern movements advocate for greater inclusivity and participation in governance, echoing the principles laid out by Coleridge and Southey. The rise of participatory democracy, where citizens are actively involved in decision-making processes, reflects a modern interpretation of pantisocracy.Furthermore, technology has introduced new possibilities for achieving a more equitable governance structure. Online platforms and social media enable individuals to voice their opinions and engage in discussions on a global scale. These tools can facilitate a form of pantisocracy by allowing diverse perspectives to be heard and considered in the policymaking process.In conclusion, while the concept of pantisocracy may seem idealistic, it serves as a valuable framework for examining our current political systems. It challenges us to consider how we can create more inclusive and equitable societies. As we navigate the complexities of modern governance, the dream of a pantisocracy—where every voice matters and equality prevails—remains a guiding principle worth striving for. By learning from the past and embracing innovative solutions, we can work towards a future that embodies the spirit of pantisocracy and ensures that all individuals have an equal stake in shaping their communities and governments.

在政治哲学领域，术语pantisocracy指的是一种所有社会成员在决策中具有平等权力和影响力的政府体系。这个概念最初由诗人塞缪尔·泰勒·柯尔律治和罗伯特·索思于19世纪初提出，他们设想了一个乌托邦社会，在这个社会中，每个人都能平等地参与治理。这个词本身源自希腊语中的“pan”，意为“所有”，以及“isos”，意为“平等”，因此体现了治理平等的本质。pantisocracy的理念出现在欧洲社会和政治动荡的时期。工业革命正在改变社会，导致富人与穷人之间的差距加大。柯尔律治和索思试图通过他们提出的治理模式来解决这些不平等问题。他们认为，pantisocracy将消除通常导致压迫和不公正的等级结构。在他们的愿景中，每个人都有发言权，决策将是集体做出的，确保没有单一实体能够主导或剥削他人。然而，pantisocracy的实际实施面临重大挑战。虽然平等的理想令人向往，但在治理中实现真正的平等需要克服根深蒂固的社会规范和权力动态。例如，pantisocracy将如何处理分歧？在一个每个人的意见都被同等重视的系统中，冲突的潜力增加。此外，问题出现了：所有个人是否具备在复杂问题上做出明智决策所需的知识和技能？尽管面临这些挑战，pantisocracy的概念在当代关于民主和社会正义的讨论中仍然引起共鸣。许多现代运动倡导在治理中实现更大的包容性和参与性，呼应了柯尔律治和索思提出的原则。参与式民主的兴起，即公民积极参与决策过程，反映了对pantisocracy的现代诠释。此外，技术为实现更公平的治理结构提供了新的可能性。在线平台和社交媒体使个人能够在全球范围内表达意见并参与讨论。这些工具可以通过允许多样的观点在政策制定过程中被听取和考虑，从而促进一种形式的pantisocracy。总之，尽管pantisocracy的概念看似理想化，但它为我们审视当前政治体系提供了有价值的框架。它挑战我们思考如何创造更具包容性和公平性的社会。在我们应对现代治理的复杂性时，pantisocracy的梦想——每个声音都重要，平等占主导地位——仍然是值得努力追求的指导原则。通过借鉴过去，拥抱创新解决方案，我们可以朝着体现pantisocracy精神的未来迈进，确保所有个人在塑造他们的社区和政府中拥有平等的发言权。