simplism

简明释义

英[ˈsɪmplɪz(ə)m]美[ˈsɪmplɪzəm]

n. 简化主义；单纯化主义

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Eastern culture and style of the simple connotation of shape and played a subtle role in the birth of Western modernist simplism style of the external characteristics have a direct impact.

东方的文化对简约主义风格的内涵塑造起到了潜移默化的作用，而西方现代主义的诞生对简约主义风格的外部特征产生直接的影响。

2.Simplism begets simplistic countermeasures. Countermeasures must address root causes, real root causes. And the countermeasures must work in the real world.

简化主义产生过分简单的对策。对策必须针对根本原因，真正的根本原因，并且对策必须确实真实的运行。

3.It's a lot of simplism attached to them.

对他们而言有很多的简化主义。

4.Eastern culture and style of the simple connotation of shape and played a subtle role in the birth of Western modernist simplism style of the external characteristics have a direct impact.

东方的文化对简约主义风格的内涵塑造起到了潜移默化的作用，而西方现代主义的诞生对简约主义风格的外部特征产生直接的影响。

5.The teacher warned against simplism in social studies, encouraging students to think critically about different perspectives.

老师警告不要在社会研究中采用简化主义，鼓励学生批判性地思考不同的观点。

6.His approach to solving the problem was marked by simplism, overlooking the various stakeholders involved.

他解决问题的方法带有简化主义的特征，忽视了各方利益相关者。

7.Critics argue that the film presents a simplism version of history, glossing over significant events.

批评者认为这部电影呈现了一个简化主义的历史版本，掩盖了重要事件。

8.In discussions about climate change, simplism can lead to ineffective solutions that fail to address root causes.

在关于气候变化的讨论中，简化主义可能导致无效的解决方案，无法解决根本原因。

9.The politician's argument was criticized for its simplism, as it ignored the complexities of the issue.

这位政治家的论点因其简化主义而受到批评，因为它忽视了问题的复杂性。

作文

In today's fast-paced world, we often encounter complex issues that require thoughtful analysis and nuanced understanding. However, there is a tendency among some individuals and groups to resort to oversimplification when addressing these challenges. This phenomenon is known as simplism, which refers to the reduction of complex ideas into overly simple terms or solutions, often ignoring the underlying intricacies involved. Simplism can be particularly problematic in discussions surrounding social, political, and environmental issues, where the reality is rarely black and white.For instance, consider the debate on climate change. Some argue that the solution lies solely in reducing carbon emissions, while others believe that technological innovation will solve the problem. Both perspectives contain elements of truth, but simplism in these arguments can lead to ineffective policies. By focusing exclusively on one aspect, we risk neglecting other critical factors such as economic implications, social justice, and the need for global cooperation. A more comprehensive approach would involve recognizing the multifaceted nature of climate change and addressing it through a combination of strategies.Moreover, simplism can also manifest in personal relationships. When conflicts arise, individuals may oversimplify the motivations and feelings of others, labeling them as 'good' or 'bad'. This binary thinking can hinder effective communication and resolution. Instead of seeking to understand the complexities of each person's perspective, people may jump to conclusions that reinforce their own biases. This not only creates division but also prevents meaningful dialogue that could lead to reconciliation.Additionally, in the realm of education, simplism can undermine critical thinking. When students are presented with information in a way that strips away its complexity, they may struggle to engage with the material on a deeper level. For example, teaching history through a lens that only highlights heroes and villains ignores the rich tapestry of human experience that includes shades of gray. Encouraging students to grapple with these complexities fosters a more profound understanding of the subject matter and prepares them to navigate the real world, which is rarely straightforward.The media also plays a significant role in perpetuating simplism. In an age where sound bites and headlines dominate, nuanced discussions often get lost. Journalists may simplify complex stories to fit into a limited time frame or space, leading to misinterpretations and a lack of depth in public discourse. As consumers of news, it is crucial for us to seek out sources that provide comprehensive analyses rather than accepting surface-level narratives.In conclusion, while simplism may provide a sense of clarity in a chaotic world, it ultimately does a disservice to our understanding of complex issues. Whether in climate change, personal relationships, education, or media consumption, embracing complexity is vital for fostering informed discussions and effective solutions. By resisting the urge to oversimplify, we can cultivate a more nuanced perspective that acknowledges the richness of human experience and the intricate web of factors that influence our world. Only then can we hope to address the challenges we face with the seriousness and depth they deserve.

在当今快节奏的世界中，我们经常遇到需要深思熟虑和细致理解的复杂问题。然而，一些个人和群体在处理这些挑战时往往倾向于诉诸于过度简化。这种现象被称为simplism，它指的是将复杂思想简化为过于简单的术语或解决方案，常常忽视了其中的深层复杂性。Simplism在围绕社会、政治和环境问题的讨论中尤其成问题，因为现实通常不是黑白分明的。例如，考虑气候变化的辩论。有些人认为解决方案仅在于减少碳排放，而另一些人则相信技术创新将解决问题。这两种观点都有一定的真理，但在这些论点中存在的simplism可能导致无效的政策。专注于某一方面，我们可能会忽视其他关键因素，如经济影响、社会公正和全球合作的必要性。更全面的方法应包括认识到气候变化的多面性，并通过多种策略来应对。此外，simplism也可能在个人关系中表现出来。当冲突出现时，个人可能会过于简单化他人的动机和感受，将其标记为“好”或“坏”。这种二元思维会阻碍有效的沟通和解决方案。人们可能没有努力去理解每个人观点的复杂性，而是跳到结论，强化自己的偏见。这不仅造成了分裂，还阻止了有意义的对话，从而导致和解的可能性。此外，在教育领域，simplism可能会削弱批判性思维。当学生以剥离复杂性的方式接收信息时，他们可能难以更深入地参与材料。例如，通过只强调英雄和恶棍的视角来教授历史，忽略了人类经历的丰富多彩。鼓励学生与这些复杂性斗争，可以促进他们对学科的更深刻理解，并为他们准备好应对现实世界，这往往并不简单。媒体在延续simplism方面也发挥了重要作用。在一个声音片段和标题主导的时代，细致的讨论常常迷失。记者可能会为了适应有限的时间框架或空间而简化复杂的故事，导致误解和公众话语的缺乏深度。作为新闻消费者，我们必须寻找提供全面分析的来源，而不是接受表面叙述。总之，虽然simplism可能在混乱的世界中提供一种清晰感，但它最终对我们对复杂问题的理解造成了损害。无论是在气候变化、个人关系、教育还是媒体消费中，拥抱复杂性对于促进知情讨论和有效解决方案至关重要。通过抵制过度简化的冲动，我们可以培养一种更细致的视角，承认人类经验的丰富性以及影响我们世界的各种因素的复杂网络。只有这样，我们才能希望以应有的严肃性和深度来应对我们所面临的挑战。