philosophism

简明释义

英[/ˈfɪl.ə.sə.fɪ.zəm/]美[/ˈfɪl.ə.sə.fɪ.zəm/]

n. 虚伪的哲学；哲学的思索

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Philosophism became a powerful tool.

哲学的思索成为一种有力的工具。

2.Philosophism became a powerful tool.

哲学的思索成为一种有力的工具。

3.Many debates in academia revolve around the concept of philosophism, which refers to an overly abstract or theoretical approach to philosophy.

许多学术辩论围绕着哲学主义的概念展开，这指的是对哲学过于抽象或理论化的处理方式。

4.In discussions of ethics, some participants fall into philosophism, losing sight of practical implications.

在伦理讨论中，一些参与者陷入了哲学主义，失去了对实际影响的关注。

5.The critics argued that his work was more about philosophism than practical solutions to real-world issues.

批评者认为他的作品更多的是关于哲学主义，而不是对现实问题的实际解决方案。

6.Her article criticized the trend of philosophism in modern philosophy, advocating for a more grounded approach.

她的文章批评了现代哲学中的哲学主义趋势，倡导一种更为务实的方法。

7.The professor warned against philosophism, urging students to apply philosophical ideas to everyday life.

教授警告要避免哲学主义，并敦促学生将哲学思想应用于日常生活中。

作文

In the realm of intellectual discourse, the term philosophism refers to a specific philosophical approach that often emphasizes abstract reasoning and speculative thought over practical application. This concept can be traced back to various philosophical traditions, where thinkers have engaged in deep theoretical discussions without necessarily grounding their ideas in empirical evidence or real-world implications. While this method of thinking has its merits, it also raises critical questions about the relevance and applicability of philosophical ideas in everyday life.To better understand philosophism, we must consider its historical context and the evolution of philosophical thought. Throughout history, philosophers such as Plato and Descartes have employed abstract reasoning to explore fundamental questions about existence, knowledge, and morality. Their work laid the foundation for many modern philosophical inquiries, yet it also highlighted the potential pitfalls of engaging in overly speculative thought.One of the key criticisms of philosophism is that it can lead to a disconnect between theory and practice. For instance, while a philosopher may develop an intricate theory about justice, it becomes problematic if this theory fails to address the complexities of real-world justice systems. This gap between philosophical abstraction and practical application can result in theories that, although intellectually stimulating, lack the capacity to effect meaningful change in society.Moreover, philosophism can sometimes foster a sense of elitism within philosophical circles. Those who engage in abstract philosophical discussions may inadvertently create an environment where only a select few are able to participate meaningfully. This exclusivity can alienate individuals who may benefit from philosophical insights but feel intimidated by the dense language and complex concepts often associated with abstract reasoning.Despite these critiques, it is essential to recognize that philosophism is not inherently negative. The ability to think abstractly is a valuable skill that can lead to innovative ideas and new ways of understanding the world. Philosophers who engage in this mode of thought can contribute significantly to various fields, including ethics, political theory, and metaphysics. However, it is crucial for these thinkers to remain aware of the limitations of their approach and strive to connect their ideas to practical realities.In contemporary discourse, the challenge lies in finding a balance between philosophism and pragmatism. Philosophers today are increasingly called upon to address pressing social issues, such as climate change, inequality, and technological advancements. By integrating abstract reasoning with empirical evidence and practical considerations, philosophers can create frameworks that not only provoke thought but also inspire action.In conclusion, while philosophism represents a significant aspect of philosophical inquiry, it is essential for philosophers to remain grounded in the realities of human experience. By bridging the gap between theory and practice, they can ensure that their ideas resonate beyond the confines of academic discourse and contribute to the betterment of society. Ultimately, the true value of philosophy lies not just in the exploration of abstract concepts but in its ability to illuminate the human condition and guide us toward a more just and equitable world.

在知识讨论的领域中，术语哲学主义指的是一种特定的哲学方法，通常强调抽象推理和投机思维，而不是实际应用。这个概念可以追溯到各种哲学传统，思想家们在没有必要将他们的思想建立在经验证据或现实世界影响上的情况下，参与了深刻的理论讨论。虽然这种思维方式有其优点，但它也提出了关于哲学思想在日常生活中的相关性和适用性的重要问题。为了更好地理解哲学主义，我们必须考虑其历史背景和哲学思想的演变。在历史上，柏拉图和笛卡尔等哲学家使用抽象推理来探讨关于存在、知识和道德的基本问题。他们的工作为许多现代哲学探究奠定了基础，但也突显了过于投机性思考的潜在陷阱。对哲学主义的一个主要批评是，它可能导致理论与实践之间的脱节。例如，尽管一位哲学家可能会发展出一个复杂的正义理论，但如果这个理论未能解决现实正义系统的复杂性，那就变得有问题。这种哲学抽象与实际应用之间的差距可能导致理论虽然在智力上令人兴奋，但缺乏在社会中产生有意义变化的能力。此外，哲学主义有时会在哲学圈内培养出一种精英主义感。那些参与抽象哲学讨论的人可能无意中创造了一个环境，只有少数人能够有意义地参与。这种排他性可能会使那些可能从哲学见解中受益的人感到疏远，但由于复杂的语言和概念而感到畏惧。尽管有这些批评，重要的是要认识到哲学主义并非固有消极。抽象思考的能力是一项宝贵的技能，可以引导出创新的想法和理解世界的新方式。参与这种思维模式的哲学家可以对伦理学、政治理论和形而上学等各个领域做出重要贡献。然而，这些思想家必须意识到自己方法的局限性，并努力将他们的思想与实际现实相连接。在当代讨论中，挑战在于找到哲学主义与务实主义之间的平衡。如今，哲学家们越来越被要求解决紧迫的社会问题，如气候变化、不平等和技术进步。通过将抽象推理与经验证据和实际考虑结合起来，哲学家可以创建不仅引发思考而且激励行动的框架。总之，虽然哲学主义代表了哲学探究的重要方面，但哲学家必须保持扎根于人类经验的现实之中。通过弥合理论与实践之间的差距，他们可以确保自己的思想超越学术讨论的局限，促进社会的改善。最终，哲学的真正价值不仅在于探索抽象概念，还在于其揭示人类状况并引导我们走向一个更公正和公平的世界的能力。