blander

简明释义

英[ˈblændə(r)]美[blændər]

adj. 温和的；清淡的；没精打采的

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.The former are almost exactly like the French, except having a blander cuisine and more respect for authority, the latter being more like the Germans except even more stiff, rigid and cranky.

讲法语的瑞士人就是再版法国人，不过瑞士的食物没有法国那么乏味，对当局的态度也没有法国那么随便；讲德语的瑞士人跟德国人比是青出于蓝，他们比德国人理严肃、死板而古里古怪。

2.The meat was tender, unctuous, blander than pork, but stronger than chicken.

肉质鲜嫩滑爽，不如猪肉那么香，但比鸡肉味道好。

3.Do you like a little salty, or a little blander?

你想吃咸一点还是淡一点？

4.Serle has a blander personality than Howard.

塞尔在个性上比霍华德更沉闷。

5.Volunteers (who were asked to sign a waiver) reported that the charged lemonade tasted 'blander', because the electricity simulated the taste of salt.

志愿者们(被要求签署免责条例)报告称，通电的柠檬水喝起来“口感更清淡”，因为电流冒充了盐的味道。

6.The meat was tender, 36 unctuous, blander than pork, but stronger than chicken.

狗肉鲜嫩肥美，尽管不如猪肉香，却比鸡肉的味道要好。

7.Together they present the blander, the more acceptable face of the Critique.

它们一起呈现了一个更平和、更能接受的批判哲学面相。

8.The chef decided to make a blander (更温和的) version of the spicy dish for the children.

厨师决定为孩子们做一个更温和的版本的辛辣菜肴。

9.The movie was criticized for its blander (更无趣的) storyline compared to the original.

这部电影因其与原版相比更无趣的情节而受到批评。

10.They opted for a blander (更温和的) flavor of ice cream for the party.

他们选择了更温和的冰淇淋口味来举办派对。

11.After trying the blander (更淡的) flavors, she realized she preferred stronger tastes.

在尝试了更淡的口味后，她意识到自己更喜欢浓烈的味道。

12.He found the blander (更乏味的) presentation of the topic less engaging than he expected.

他发现这个话题的更乏味的演示比他预期的更不吸引人。

作文

In today's fast-paced world, the importance of communication cannot be overstated. People often find themselves in situations where they need to express their thoughts clearly and effectively. However, sometimes, in an effort to simplify our messages, we might resort to using language that is too vague or overly simplistic. This tendency can lead to misunderstandings or a lack of depth in our conversations. One such example of this phenomenon is the use of words that are considered blander (平淡的) than necessary. While simplicity in language can be beneficial, there is a fine line between being clear and being bland.When we communicate, especially in writing, the goal is often to engage our audience. Using blander (平淡的) language can make our writing less interesting and fail to capture the reader's attention. For instance, if a writer describes a sunset as 'the sun went down,' it may not evoke much imagery or emotion. Instead, a more vivid description like 'the sun dipped below the horizon, painting the sky in hues of orange and purple' creates a more engaging image. It is essential to strike a balance between clarity and creativity in our language.Moreover, the use of blander (平淡的) expressions can also reflect a lack of confidence in one's ideas. When individuals choose to use generic phrases instead of expressing their unique perspectives, it can dilute the impact of their message. For example, saying 'I think this is a good idea' is far less compelling than 'This idea could revolutionize our approach.' The latter not only conveys enthusiasm but also encourages further discussion.In professional settings, the use of blander (平淡的) language can have significant repercussions. During presentations or meetings, if a speaker relies on overly simplistic terms, they may fail to convey the importance of their points. This can lead to disengagement from the audience, who may feel that the topic lacks substance. To avoid this, professionals should strive to use precise language that reflects the complexity of their ideas while remaining accessible to their audience.Furthermore, in creative writing, the danger of blander (平淡的) language is even more pronounced. Authors must captivate their readers with rich vocabulary and imaginative descriptions. A novel filled with blander (平淡的) phrases risks losing its audience, as readers seek immersive experiences that transport them to different worlds. Therefore, writers must cultivate their language skills to enhance their storytelling.In conclusion, while there is a place for simplicity in communication, relying on blander (平淡的) language can undermine the effectiveness of our messages. Whether in everyday conversations, professional interactions, or creative endeavors, it is crucial to find the right balance between clarity and engagement. By choosing our words carefully and avoiding overly simplistic expressions, we can ensure that our communication resonates with our audience and leaves a lasting impression.

在当今快节奏的世界中，沟通的重要性不容小觑。人们常常发现自己处于需要清晰有效地表达思想的情境中。然而，有时我们为了简化信息，可能会使用过于模糊或过于简单的语言。这种倾向可能导致误解或对话缺乏深度。这一现象的一个例子是使用被认为是blander（平淡的）词汇。虽然语言的简单性可能是有益的，但在清晰与平淡之间有一条微妙的界限。当我们交流时，尤其是在写作中，目标往往是吸引观众。使用blander（平淡的）语言会使我们的写作变得不那么有趣，并无法引起读者的注意。例如，如果一个作者将日落描述为“太阳下山了”，这可能不会激发太多的意象或情感。相反，更生动的描述，比如“太阳沉入地平线，天空被橙色和紫色的色调涂抹”，则创造了更具吸引力的画面。在我们的语言中找到清晰性和创造性之间的平衡至关重要。此外，使用blander（平淡的）表达也可能反映出对自己观点缺乏信心。当个人选择使用通用短语而不是表达自己独特的观点时，会削弱信息的影响力。例如，说“我认为这是个好主意”远不如“这个想法可以彻底改变我们的做法”来得引人注目。后者不仅传达了热情，还鼓励进一步讨论。在专业环境中，使用blander（平淡的）语言可能会产生重大影响。在演示或会议中，如果演讲者依赖过于简单的术语，他们可能无法传达观点的重要性。这可能导致听众的失去兴趣，因为他们可能觉得话题缺乏实质。因此，专业人士应该努力使用精确的语言，反映他们思想的复杂性，同时让听众能够理解。此外，在创意写作中，使用blander（平淡的）语言的危险更加明显。作者必须用丰富的词汇和富有想象力的描述来吸引读者。充满blander（平淡的）短语的小说有失去听众的风险，因为读者寻求让他们沉浸于不同世界的体验。因此，作家必须培养自己的语言技能，以增强他们的叙事能力。总之，虽然在交流中有简洁的空间，但依赖于blander（平淡的）语言可能会削弱我们信息的有效性。无论是在日常对话、专业互动还是创意工作中，找到清晰性和参与感之间的正确平衡至关重要。通过仔细选择我们的词汇，避免过于简单的表达，我们可以确保我们的沟通与观众产生共鸣，并留下持久的印象。