unanimity

简明释义

英[ˌjuːnəˈnɪməti]美[ˌjuːnəˈnɪməti]

n. 同意，全体一致

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Unanimity was attained after the discussion ended after three hours.

在三个小时的讨论结果后，全体一致同意。

2.There is little unanimity of thought, however, as to the precise pathways of evolution in the past.

人们的思想是很难达到一致的，对于过去生物进化的精确途径这一问题同样是这样。

3."We do not aspire to unanimity, which is usually fictitious," he said.

“我们不指望全体一致，那通常是虚假的。”他说道。

4.There's been less unanimity about the movie's "message."

而影片中的“预言”却没有得到人们的一致认可。

5.Hence we find no unanimity among scholars on the subject.

因此，我们发现学者之间没有一致的的看法。

6.The content filled in should be in unanimity with revealed on the valid id card.

填写的内容应与有效身份证件上显示的一致。

7.These discussions have led to a remarkable unanimity.

这些讨论导致引人注目的一致意见。

8.In the board meeting, there was unanimity regarding the new policy changes.

在董事会上，关于新政策变更的问题上达成了一致意见。

9.The jury's unanimity was crucial for the verdict.

陪审团的一致意见对裁决至关重要。

10.The committee reached a state of unanimity after hours of discussion.

经过数小时的讨论，委员会达成了一致意见。

11.Achieving unanimity in such a diverse group can be quite challenging.

在这样一个多元化的群体中达成一致意见可能相当困难。

12.The decision to proceed with the project was made with unanimity among all stakeholders.

所有利益相关者对继续进行该项目的决定达成了一致意见。

作文

In any democratic society, the concept of decision-making plays a crucial role in shaping policies and guiding actions. One term that often arises in discussions about collective decision-making is unanimity, which refers to complete agreement among all members involved in a decision-making process. Achieving unanimity can be a challenging task, as it requires every individual to align their opinions and preferences, but when it is accomplished, it can lead to stronger commitment and cohesion within a group.The significance of unanimity becomes particularly evident in contexts such as legislative bodies, corporate boards, or community organizations. For instance, when a legislative body reaches a state of unanimity on a proposed bill, it indicates that all representatives support the measure wholeheartedly. This can enhance the legitimacy of the legislation and foster public trust, as citizens feel reassured that their elected officials are in complete accord on important issues.However, achieving unanimity is not without its challenges. Diverse groups often comprise individuals with varying backgrounds, experiences, and perspectives. These differences can lead to conflicting viewpoints, making it difficult to reach a consensus. In some cases, the pursuit of unanimity may even hinder progress, as prolonged discussions and negotiations can stall decision-making processes. Therefore, while unanimity is an admirable goal, it is essential to balance it with the need for timely and effective decisions.Moreover, there are instances where striving for unanimity can result in groupthink, a phenomenon where the desire for harmony overrides critical thinking and individual dissent. Groupthink can lead to poor decision-making, as alternative viewpoints are suppressed in favor of maintaining consensus. This highlights the importance of fostering an environment where open dialogue and healthy debate are encouraged, even if it means sacrificing unanimity at times.In contrast, there are also situations where a lack of unanimity can be beneficial. For example, in creative industries or academic research, diverse opinions can lead to innovative solutions and breakthroughs. Embracing differing perspectives can spark new ideas and challenge the status quo, ultimately driving progress and improvement.In conclusion, while unanimity represents an ideal state of agreement that can strengthen group dynamics and enhance decision-making legitimacy, it is important to recognize its limitations. Striving for unanimity should not come at the expense of critical thinking or the exploration of diverse viewpoints. Instead, leaders and decision-makers should aim to create inclusive environments where all voices are heard, allowing for both consensus and constructive disagreement. By doing so, they can harness the power of collaboration while still valuing the unique contributions of each individual, ultimately leading to more robust and well-rounded outcomes.

在任何民主社会中，决策的概念在塑造政策和指导行动方面扮演着至关重要的角色。一个在集体决策讨论中经常出现的术语是unanimity，它指的是所有参与决策过程的成员之间的完全一致。实现unanimity可能是一项具有挑战性的任务，因为这要求每个人都对自己的意见和偏好达成一致，但当这一目标实现时，可以增强团体内的承诺和凝聚力。unanimity的重要性在立法机构、公司董事会或社区组织等背景中尤为明显。例如，当一个立法机构对一项提案法案达成unanimity时，这表明所有代表都全心全意支持该措施。这可以增强立法的合法性并促进公众信任，因为公民感到放心，他们的民选官员在重要问题上完全一致。然而，实现unanimity并非没有挑战。多样化的群体通常由具有不同背景、经验和观点的个体组成。这些差异可能导致冲突的观点，使达成共识变得困难。在某些情况下，追求unanimity甚至可能阻碍进展，因为长时间的讨论和谈判可能会拖延决策过程。因此，虽然unanimity是一个值得赞赏的目标，但平衡其与及时有效决策的需求至关重要。此外，还有一些情况下，追求unanimity可能导致群体思维现象，这种现象中，和谐的愿望压制了批判性思维和个人异议。群体思维可能导致糟糕的决策，因为替代观点在维持共识的过程中被压制。这凸显了营造开放对话和健康辩论环境的重要性，即使这意味着有时要牺牲unanimity。相比之下，在创意产业或学术研究等领域，缺乏unanimity有时也可能是有益的。例如，拥抱不同的意见可以导致创新解决方案和突破。接受不同的观点可以激发新想法并挑战现状，最终推动进步和改善。总之，虽然unanimity代表了一种理想的协议状态，可以增强群体动态并提高决策合法性，但重要的是要认识到它的局限性。追求unanimity不应以牺牲批判性思维或探索多样化观点为代价。相反，领导者和决策者应该旨在创造包容性的环境，使所有声音都能被听到，从而允许共识和建设性的分歧并存。通过这样做，他们可以利用合作的力量，同时仍然重视每个人的独特贡献，最终导致更强大和全面的结果。