arbitral
简明释义
adj. 仲裁的；仲裁人的
英英释义
Relating to or resulting from arbitration, which is a method of resolving disputes outside the courts. | 与仲裁相关或由仲裁产生，仲裁是一种在法庭外解决争端的方法。 |
单词用法
仲裁裁决；公断书 | |
仲裁法庭 |
同义词
反义词
| 司法的 | 司法系统确保公正审判。 | ||
| 行政的 | 行政决定由政府机构做出。 |
例句
1.If the parties do not choose, the laws at the locality of the arbitral authority or of the arbitration shall apply.
当事人没有选择的，适用仲裁机构所在地法律或者仲裁地法律。
2.The arbitral award shall be final and binding upon both parties hereto.
仲裁结果是终局性的并对双方具有约束力。
3.When rendering an award in a labor dispute case, the arbitral tribunal may first render an award on the part of facts that have been ascertained.
仲裁庭裁决劳动争议案件时，其中一部分事实已经清楚，可以就该部分先行裁决。
4.The arbitral tribunal shall be entitled to require security for the costs of such measures.
仲裁庭应有权要求对此种措施的费用缴付保证金。
5.The Arbitral Tribunal can deliver its decision in the form of either an interim award or a final award.
仲裁庭的决定可以以中间裁决的形式作出，也可以在终局裁决中作出。
6.Where an arbitral tribunal fails to form the opinions by a majority, the arbitral award shall be rendered according to the opinion of the chief arbitrator.
仲裁庭不能形成多数意见时，裁决应当按照首席仲裁员的意见作出。
7.The arbitral tribunal shall comprise three arbitrators and has a chief arbitrator.
仲裁庭由三名仲裁员组成，设首席仲裁员。
8."There have been major flaws and errors in the arbitral proceeding of the case in terms of laws, facts and evidence, " Ouyang said.
欧阳玉靖说道：“在这起仲裁案件的审理过程中，在法律依据、事实陈述和相关举证方面都存在着重大的缺陷和错误。”
9.In international trade, arbitral 仲裁的 agreements are common to avoid lengthy litigation.
在国际贸易中，仲裁的协议常见，以避免漫长的诉讼。
10.An arbitral 仲裁的 award was issued after the hearing concluded.
在听证会结束后，发布了一个仲裁的裁决。
11.The arbitral 仲裁的 tribunal made a decision that both sides accepted.
该仲裁的法庭做出的决定被双方接受。
12.The parties agreed to resolve their dispute through an arbitral 仲裁的 process.
各方同意通过一个仲裁的过程解决他们的争议。
13.The arbitral 仲裁的 process is often faster than going to court.
与上法庭相比，仲裁的过程通常更快。
作文
In the realm of dispute resolution, the term arbitral plays a crucial role. It refers to anything related to arbitration, which is a method used to resolve conflicts outside the traditional court system. As societies become increasingly complex and interconnected, the need for efficient and effective dispute resolution mechanisms has grown significantly. This is where arbitral processes come into play, offering a viable alternative to litigation. Arbitration is often preferred for its confidentiality, speed, and flexibility. Unlike court proceedings, which are typically public and can be prolonged, arbitral hearings allow parties to resolve their disputes in a more private setting. This aspect is particularly appealing to businesses that wish to protect sensitive information from becoming public knowledge. Additionally, the arbitral process tends to be faster, as it avoids the lengthy procedures associated with court cases. Parties can agree on timelines and procedures that suit their needs, making the entire process more efficient.Moreover, the flexibility of arbitral proceedings extends to the choice of arbitrators. Parties involved in a dispute can select individuals with specific expertise relevant to their case. This ensures that the decision-makers have a deep understanding of the issues at hand, leading to more informed outcomes. In contrast, court judges may not have specialized knowledge in every area of law, which can sometimes result in less satisfactory resolutions.Despite its advantages, the arbitral process is not without its criticisms. Some argue that it can be biased, especially if one party has significantly more resources to choose a prestigious arbitrator or engage in a longer arbitration process. There are also concerns regarding the enforceability of arbitral awards, particularly in jurisdictions where arbitration is not well recognized. Nevertheless, many international treaties and national laws support the enforcement of arbitral decisions, providing a framework for upholding these resolutions.In conclusion, the concept of arbitral proceedings represents a significant evolution in how disputes are resolved. As businesses and individuals seek more efficient and confidential ways to address conflicts, the popularity of arbitration continues to rise. Understanding the implications and processes involved in arbitral resolutions is essential for anyone engaged in legal agreements or business transactions. Ultimately, while there are challenges, the benefits of arbitral methods make them an attractive option in today’s fast-paced world of conflict resolution.
在争议解决的领域中，术语arbitral扮演着至关重要的角色。它指的是与仲裁相关的任何事物，仲裁是一种在传统法庭系统之外解决冲突的方法。随着社会日益复杂和相互联系，效率和有效的争议解决机制的需求显著增长。这就是arbitral过程发挥作用的地方，为诉讼提供了可行的替代方案。仲裁通常因其保密性、速度和灵活性而受到青睐。与通常是公开且可能漫长的法庭程序不同，arbitral听证会允许各方在更私密的环境中解决争端。这一方面对希望保护敏感信息不被公开的企业尤为吸引。此外，arbitral过程往往更快，因为它避免了与法庭案件相关的冗长程序。各方可以就时间表和程序达成一致，使整个过程更加高效。此外，arbitral程序的灵活性还体现在仲裁员的选择上。参与争议的各方可以选择具有与其案件相关的特定专业知识的个人。这确保了解决者对手头问题有深入理解，从而导致更明智的结果。相比之下，法官可能并不在每个法律领域都有专业知识，这有时会导致不太令人满意的解决方案。尽管有其优势，但arbitral过程并非没有批评。一些人认为它可能存在偏见，特别是如果一方有显著更多的资源来选择声望较高的仲裁员或参与更长的仲裁过程。还有人对arbitral裁决的可执行性表示担忧，特别是在仲裁不被很好认可的司法管辖区。然而，许多国际条约和国家法律支持arbitral决定的执行，为维护这些解决方案提供了框架。总之，arbitral程序的概念代表了争端解决方式的重要演变。随着企业和个人寻求更高效和保密的方式来处理冲突，仲裁的受欢迎程度持续上升。理解arbitral解决方案所涉及的影响和过程对于任何参与法律协议或商业交易的人来说都是必不可少的。最终，尽管存在挑战，arbitral方法的好处使其在当今快速发展的冲突解决世界中成为一种有吸引力的选择。
