anarchical
简明释义
英[ˌænˈɑː.kɪ.kəl]美[ˌænˈɑr.kɪ.kəl]
adj. 无政府主义的
英英释义
Relating to or characterized by a lack of order or control; chaotic. | 与缺乏秩序或控制相关的;混乱的。 |
Pertaining to anarchy, which is a state of society without government or law. | 与无政府状态相关,即没有政府或法律的社会状态。 |
单词用法
无政府状态的社会 | |
无政府状态的国家 | |
无政府行为 | |
无政府状态的条件 |
同义词
反义词
例句
1.As they saw it, in an anarchical international world, choosing priorities is tough.
在他们看来,在一个混乱无序的国际社会里,选择重点相当不易。
2.As they saw it, in an anarchical international world, choosing priorities is tough.
在他们看来,在一个混乱无序的国际社会里,选择重点相当不易。
3.In an anarchical 无政府状态的 society, there is often a lack of organized governance.
在一个无政府状态的社会中,通常缺乏有组织的治理。
4.Some argue that total freedom can lead to an anarchical 无政府状态的 system where chaos reigns.
一些人认为,完全的自由可能导致一个无政府状态的系统,混乱统治。
5.The protest turned into an anarchical 无政府状态的 situation as demonstrators clashed with police.
抗议活动变成了一种无政府状态的局面,示威者与警察发生冲突。
6.The absence of rules led to an anarchical 无政府状态的 environment in the classroom.
缺乏规则导致课堂上出现了无政府状态的环境。
7.The anarchical 无政府状态的 conditions in the region have made it difficult for humanitarian aid to reach those in need.
该地区的无政府状态的条件使人道主义援助难以抵达需要帮助的人。
作文
In recent years, the concept of anarchy has gained significant attention in political discourse. The term anarchical, which refers to a state of disorder due to the absence or non-recognition of authority, is often used to describe situations where governance breaks down and chaos ensues. An example of this can be seen in various regions around the world where governments have collapsed, leading to anarchical conditions. In such environments, the lack of a central authority can result in power struggles among different factions, making it difficult for any form of order to be established.The implications of anarchical situations are profound. Societies that experience anarchical conditions often face severe challenges, including increased violence, poverty, and instability. For instance, in countries where civil wars have erupted, the absence of a governing body leads to lawlessness, as individuals and groups take matters into their own hands. This not only endangers lives but also disrupts the economy and social fabric of the nation.Moreover, the international community often finds itself grappling with the consequences of anarchical states. Humanitarian crises emerge as millions flee conflict zones, seeking refuge in neighboring countries. The influx of refugees can strain resources and create tensions in host nations. Additionally, anarchical regions can become breeding grounds for terrorism and organized crime, further complicating global security efforts.It is essential to understand that not all instances of anarchical behavior stem from a complete lack of structure. Sometimes, movements that seek to dismantle existing systems of power can be labeled as anarchical, even if they aim to establish a new form of governance. For example, protests and revolutions may be characterized as anarchical when they challenge the status quo. While these movements may disrupt order, they can also lead to positive change if they result in a more equitable system of governance.In contrast to anarchical systems, societies governed by stable institutions tend to thrive. A strong government provides the necessary framework for law and order, allowing citizens to coexist peacefully. When authority is respected and upheld, communities can focus on development and progress rather than survival. The contrast between anarchical and structured societies highlights the importance of effective governance in maintaining peace and stability.In conclusion, the term anarchical embodies a complex set of circumstances that arise when authority is absent or challenged. Understanding the nuances of anarchical situations is crucial for policymakers and citizens alike. As we navigate an increasingly interconnected world, recognizing the signs of anarchical behavior can help us address the root causes of conflict and promote sustainable solutions that foster peace and stability. By learning from past experiences and investing in strong institutions, we can work towards a future where anarchical conditions are minimized, and societies can flourish in harmony.
近年来,无政府状态的概念在政治话语中引起了显著关注。这个词anarchical指的是由于缺乏或不承认权威而导致的无序状态,常常用来描述治理崩溃和混乱随之而来的情况。在世界各地的各种地区,政府的崩溃导致了anarchical条件的出现,这就是一个例子。在这样的环境中,缺乏中央权威可能导致不同派系之间的权力斗争,使任何形式的秩序难以建立。anarchical情况的影响是深远的。经历anarchical条件的社会往往面临严重挑战,包括暴力、贫困和不稳定的增加。例如,在爆发内战的国家中,治理机构的缺失导致了无法无天,因为个人和团体自行采取行动。这不仅危及生命,还破坏了国家的经济和社会结构。此外,国际社会常常发现自己在应对anarchical国家的后果。人道主义危机的出现使得数百万难民逃离冲突地区,寻求邻国的庇护。难民的涌入可能会加重资源的压力,并在接收国中造成紧张局势。此外,anarchical地区可能成为恐怖主义和有组织犯罪的温床,进一步复杂化全球安全工作。理解并非所有anarchical行为的实例都源于完全缺乏结构是至关重要的。有时,旨在拆除现有权力体系的运动也可能被标记为anarchical,即使它们旨在建立一种新的治理形式。例如,当抗议和革命挑战现状时,可能会被视为anarchical。虽然这些运动可能会扰乱秩序,但如果它们导致更公平的治理体系,也可能带来积极的变化。与anarchical系统相比,由稳定机构治理的社会往往蓬勃发展。强有力的政府提供了必要的法律和秩序框架,使公民能够和平共处。当权威受到尊重和维护时,社区可以集中精力于发展和进步,而不是生存。anarchical和有序社会之间的对比突显了有效治理在维护和平与稳定中的重要性。总之,术语anarchical体现了一种复杂的情况,这种情况发生在权威缺失或受到挑战时。理解anarchical情况的细微差别对于政策制定者和公民来说至关重要。在我们导航日益互联的世界时,识别anarchical行为的迹象可以帮助我们解决冲突的根本原因,并推动可持续的解决方案,以促进和平与稳定。通过借鉴过去的经验并投资于强有力的机构,我们可以努力实现一个减少anarchical条件的未来,使社会能够和谐繁荣。