monarchic

简明释义

英[/məˈnɑrkɪk/]美[/məˈnɑrkɪk/]

adj. 君主政体的；君主的；赞成君主政体的

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Both parties say they would have preferred to keep monarchic rule.

两个党都说他们会选择保留君主体制。

2.Secondly, the poverty of the thoughts of absolute monarchic powers and the rise of nationalism offered the advantage for the spreading of republicanism.

其次，中国古代君主制度下绝对君权理论的匮乏和近代民族主义的兴起，为清末民初共和思想的肇兴提供了便利；

3.Secondly, the poverty of the thoughts of absolute monarchic powers and the rise of nationalism offered the advantage for the spreading of republicanism.

其次，中国古代君主制度下绝对君权理论的匮乏和近代民族主义的兴起，为清末民初共和思想的肇兴提供了便利；

4.The origin of the cabinet system of Ming Dynasty could be traced back to the conflicting process between the premier power and the monarchic power.

明代内阁制的缘起可追溯至相权与君权的斗争过程。

5.The country's government is strictly monarchic, with a king holding absolute power.

这个国家的政府是严格的君主制，国王拥有绝对权力。

6.In a monarchic system, the throne is usually inherited rather than elected.

在君主制系统中，王位通常是继承而不是选举产生的。

7.Many people romanticize the idea of a monarchic society, seeing it as more stable.

许多人对君主制社会的想法充满浪漫，认为它更加稳定。

8.Some argue that a monarchic government can provide a sense of continuity and national identity.

一些人认为，君主制政府可以提供一种连续性和国家认同感。

9.The monarchic traditions in this region date back several centuries.

这个地区的君主制传统可以追溯到几个世纪以前。

作文

Throughout history, various forms of governance have emerged, each with its unique characteristics and implications for society. One such system is the monarchic government, where a single ruler, often known as a monarch, holds supreme authority over the state. This form of governance has been prevalent in many cultures and continues to exist in some countries today. Understanding the monarchic system requires a look at its historical roots, its impact on society, and how it compares to other forms of governance.Historically, monarchic rule can be traced back to ancient civilizations, where kings and queens governed their realms based on divine right or hereditary succession. In these societies, the monarch was often seen as a representative of the gods, and their decisions were considered final and unquestionable. This belief in the divine right of kings not only solidified the power of the monarch but also created a strong sense of loyalty among the subjects. However, this loyalty often came at the cost of individual freedoms and rights, as the monarch's word was law.In a monarchic system, the concentration of power in the hands of one individual can lead to both stability and tyranny. On one hand, a strong monarch can provide decisive leadership, maintain order, and implement long-term policies that benefit the state. For instance, during times of crisis, a monarchic government can act swiftly without the delays often associated with democratic processes. On the other hand, the absolute power of a monarch can result in oppression and abuse. Historical examples abound, such as the reign of Louis XIV in France, who famously declared, "L'état, c'est moi" (I am the state), illustrating the dangers of unchecked authority.In modern times, many monarchic systems have evolved into constitutional monarchies, where the monarch's powers are limited by a constitution or laws of the land. In these systems, the monarch serves more as a ceremonial figurehead while elected officials handle governance. Countries like the United Kingdom and Sweden exemplify this balance, allowing for a blend of tradition and modern democratic principles. This evolution shows that monarchic systems can adapt to changing societal values, providing a bridge between historical governance and contemporary democracy.The discussion around monarchic systems often raises questions about their relevance in today’s world. Critics argue that hereditary rule is an outdated concept that does not reflect the democratic ideals of equality and representation. They assert that leadership should be based on merit rather than birthright. Conversely, supporters of monarchic systems argue that they can foster national identity and continuity, serving as symbols of unity and tradition in rapidly changing societies.In conclusion, the monarchic system is a complex form of governance with deep historical roots and significant implications for society. While it can offer stability and continuity, it also poses risks of tyranny and oppression. As nations continue to evolve, the future of monarchic governance will likely depend on its ability to adapt to the demands of modern democracy while preserving the cultural heritage that it represents. Understanding this balance is crucial for anyone interested in the dynamics of political power and governance in our world today.

纵观历史，各种治理形式应运而生，每种形式都有其独特的特征和对社会的影响。其中一种制度是君主制政府，在这种制度下，单一统治者，通常被称为君主，拥有国家的最高权力。这种治理形式在许多文化中普遍存在，并且至今仍在一些国家存在。理解君主制系统需要考察其历史根源、对社会的影响，以及它与其他治理形式的比较。历史上，君主制统治可以追溯到古代文明，国王和女王根据神权或世袭顺序治理他们的领域。在这些社会中，君主往往被视为神的代表，他们的决定被认为是最终的和不可质疑的。这种对君主神权的信仰不仅巩固了君主的权力，还在臣民中创造了强烈的忠诚感。然而，这种忠诚往往以个人自由和权利为代价，因为君主的话就是法律。在君主制系统中，权力集中在一个人手中可能导致稳定与暴政并存。一方面，强有力的君主可以提供果断的领导，维护秩序，并实施有利于国家的长期政策。例如，在危机时期，君主制政府可以迅速采取行动，而不必经历民主程序常常带来的延误。另一方面，君主的绝对权力可能导致压迫和滥用。历史上有很多例子，比如法国的路易十四，他曾名言道：“国家就是我”（L'état, c'est moi），这说明了不受制约的权力的危险。在现代，许多君主制系统已经演变为宪政君主制，在这种制度下，君主的权力受到宪法或国家法律的限制。在这些系统中，君主更多地作为礼仪象征存在，而由选举产生的官员负责治理。像英国和瑞典这样的国家就体现了这种平衡，允许传统与现代民主原则相结合。这种演变表明，君主制系统能够适应不断变化的社会价值观，为历史治理与当代民主之间架起桥梁。关于君主制系统的讨论常常引发对其在当今世界相关性的质疑。批评者认为，世袭统治是一种过时的概念，不符合平等和代表性等民主理想。他们主张，领导应该基于才能而不是出身。相反，君主制系统的支持者则认为，它们能够促进民族认同和连续性，在快速变化的社会中作为团结和传统的象征。总之，君主制系统是一种复杂的治理形式，具有深厚的历史根源和对社会的重要影响。虽然它可以提供稳定和连续性，但也存在暴政和压迫的风险。随着国家的不断发展，君主制治理的未来可能取决于其适应现代民主要求的能力，同时保留其所代表的文化遗产。理解这种平衡对于任何对我们今天世界中的政治权力和治理动态感兴趣的人来说都是至关重要的。