justifies

简明释义

英[ˈdʒʌstɪfaɪz]美[ˈdʒʌstəˌfaɪz]

证明合法

整理版面

证明……是正当的

替……辩护（justify 的第三人称单数）

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.This design justifies the elongated nature of both children's rooms.

这个设计显示了两个孩子的房间的细长的特性。

2.Our history justifies our confidence in the system but also shows that it is not foolproof.

历史证明我们有理由对这一制度保持信心，但历史也表明这一制度不是万无一失的。

3.Needs: Preserving life and health justifies more than other desires.

需求：保护生命和健康是首先要满足的最基本的意愿。

4.But don't bother asking for evidence that justifies this bleak view.

但是，没有人关心都有哪些证据证明了这个蹩脚的观点。

5.But you have to ask yourself: what is the threshold number of properties that justifies using reflection to solve this problem?

但是您必须要问问自己：当属性数量达到多少时，您必须使用反射来解决此问题？

6.And it justifies ambitious plans for naval expansion.

同时也证明了其雄心勃勃的海军扩张计划。

7.It justifies at last that variant of an old theme that a little thought estranges from life whereas much thought reconciles to life.

它最终维护了一个古老主题变体的合理：只有少许思想远离了生活，而许多思想与生活达成了和解。

8.He justifies his actions by saying he was following orders.

他通过说自己是在执行命令来证明自己的行为。

9.The evidence clearly justifies his decision to take legal action.

证据清楚地证明了他采取法律行动的决定。

10.The results of the study justify the new policy implementation.

研究结果证明了新政策实施的合理性。

11.The high cost of the project justifies the need for additional funding.

该项目的高成本证明了需要额外资金的必要性。

12.Her hard work justifies the promotion she received.

她的努力工作证明了她获得晋升的合理性。

作文

In today's world, the concept of justice plays a crucial role in shaping societies and guiding individual behavior. The idea of what is just can vary greatly from person to person, often leading to complex debates about morality and ethics. One key question that arises in these discussions is what truly justifies an action or belief. To understand this, we must delve into the nature of justification itself. Justification can be understood as the reasoning behind an action or belief that makes it acceptable or valid. For instance, when someone decides to donate to charity, they might feel that their action is justified by the positive impact it has on those in need. This reasoning not only reflects their moral values but also aligns with societal norms that promote altruism. In this case, the act of giving is justified by the benefits it brings to others, illustrating how personal and social ethics intertwine.However, not all actions are easily justifiable. Consider a situation involving self-defense. If an individual uses force to protect themselves from an attacker, they may argue that their actions are justified by the threat posed to their safety. Here, the context is crucial; the justification hinges on the immediacy of danger and the necessity of the response. This example highlights that justification often depends on situational factors, making it a nuanced topic.Moreover, the notion of what justifies an action can evolve over time. Historical events provide many examples where actions once deemed acceptable are later re-evaluated. For instance, practices such as slavery and colonialism were once justified through various arguments, including economic gain and cultural superiority. Today, however, these justifications are widely recognized as morally indefensible. This shift in perception underscores the importance of critical reflection and societal progress in determining what is justifiable.In academic discourse, the concept of justification is also significant. Philosophers have long debated the criteria that make beliefs justifiable. Some argue that beliefs must be supported by evidence, while others contend that personal experience can serve as a valid basis for justification. This debate illustrates the complexity of human thought and the diverse ways individuals arrive at conclusions. Understanding these differing perspectives is essential for fostering open dialogue and mutual respect in discussions about morality and ethics.Furthermore, the role of culture cannot be overlooked when examining what justifies certain behaviors. Different cultures have varying standards of what is considered acceptable. For example, in some cultures, communal living is justified by the belief that it strengthens social bonds, while in others, individualism is championed as a path to personal freedom. These cultural differences highlight that justification is not a one-size-fits-all concept; it is shaped by a myriad of factors including tradition, religion, and societal values.In conclusion, understanding what justifies an action or belief is a multifaceted endeavor. It requires us to consider ethical principles, situational contexts, historical perspectives, and cultural influences. As we navigate the complexities of our world, it is vital to engage in thoughtful discussions about justification. By doing so, we can foster a deeper understanding of ourselves and each other, ultimately contributing to a more just society.

在当今世界，正义的概念在塑造社会和指导个人行为方面发挥着至关重要的作用。什么是正义的观念因人而异，常常导致关于道德和伦理的复杂辩论。在这些讨论中，出现的一个关键问题是，什么真正就证明了某个行为或信念。要理解这一点，我们必须深入探讨证明本身的性质。证明可以理解为使某个行为或信念可接受或有效的理由。例如，当某人决定向慈善机构捐款时，他们可能会觉得他们的行为是有理由的，因为它对需要帮助的人产生了积极的影响。这种推理不仅反映了他们的道德价值观，还与促进利他主义的社会规范相一致。在这种情况下，给予的行为是有理由的，说明个人和社会伦理是如何交织在一起的。然而，并非所有的行为都容易证明。考虑一个涉及自卫的情况。如果一个人使用武力保护自己免受攻击者的伤害，他们可能会争辩说，他们的行为是有理由的，因为面临的威胁危及他们的安全。在这里，背景是至关重要的；证明取决于危险的紧迫性和反应的必要性。这个例子突显了证明往往依赖于情境因素，使其成为一个微妙的话题。此外，什么证明某个行为的观念可能会随着时间的推移而演变。历史事件提供了许多例子，某些行为曾被认为是可以接受的，但后来被重新评估。例如，奴隶制和殖民主义等做法曾通过各种论点，包括经济利益和文化优越性，得到证明。然而，如今，这些证明被广泛认为是道德上不可辩护的。这种观念的转变强调了批判性反思和社会进步在确定什么是有理由的方面的重要性。在学术话语中，证明的概念也很重要。哲学家们长期以来一直辩论使信念有理由的标准。有些人认为信念必须有证据支持，而另一些人则主张个人经验可以作为证明的有效基础。这场辩论说明了人类思想的复杂性以及个体得出结论的多样方式。理解这些不同的观点对于在道德和伦理讨论中促进开放的对话和相互尊重至关重要。此外，在审视什么证明某些行为时，文化的作用也不能被忽视。不同文化对什么被认为是可接受的有不同的标准。例如，在某些文化中，集体生活被证明为加强社会联系的信念，而在其他文化中，个人主义被倡导为通往个人自由的途径。这些文化差异突显了证明并不是一刀切的概念；它受到传统、宗教和社会价值观等多种因素的影响。总之，理解什么证明某个行为或信念是一个多方面的努力。它要求我们考虑伦理原则、情境背景、历史视角和文化影响。当我们在复杂的世界中航行时，参与关于证明的深思熟虑的讨论至关重要。通过这样做，我们可以加深对自己和彼此的理解，最终为建设一个更公正的社会做出贡献。