subornation

简明释义

英[ˌsʌbɔːˈneɪʃən]美[sʌbˌɔrˈneʃən]

n. 收买

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.This chapter analysis several theories about doctrine of the equitable subornation, trying to conduct a comprehensive definition to the doctrine;

该章分析我国学者对于衡平居次原则含义的几种观点，试图对该原则的概念进行全面的阐述；

2.This chapter analysis several theories about doctrine of the equitable subornation, trying to conduct a comprehensive definition to the doctrine;

该章分析我国学者对于衡平居次原则含义的几种观点，试图对该原则的概念进行全面的阐述；

3.The act of subornation can lead to severe legal consequences for those involved.

参与贿赂证人的行为可能会导致严重的法律后果。

4.The prosecutor presented a case of subornation against the defendant.

检察官对被告提出了关于贿赂证人的案件。

5.She reported the subornation attempt to the authorities immediately.

她立即向当局报告了贿赂证人的企图。

6.In the investigation, they found evidence of subornation involving several officials.

在调查中，他们发现涉及几名官员的贿赂证人的证据。

7.The lawyer was accused of subornation for trying to persuade a witness to lie in court.

这位律师因试图说服证人在法庭上作伪证而被指控为贿赂证人。

作文

In the world of law and ethics, the term subornation refers to the act of persuading someone to commit an unlawful act, especially to give false testimony or to commit perjury. This concept is particularly significant in legal contexts, as it highlights the moral and ethical dilemmas that can arise when individuals are coerced or incentivized to betray their own integrity. The implications of subornation extend beyond mere legality; they touch upon the very fabric of trust and honesty that underpins our societal structures. To understand subornation, one must consider its consequences not just for the individual involved but also for the broader community. When a person is suborned into providing false testimony, it can lead to wrongful convictions, undermine the justice system, and erode public trust in legal institutions. For instance, in a high-profile court case, if a witness is suborned by either party, the outcome may be skewed, resulting in a miscarriage of justice. This situation illustrates how subornation can have ripple effects, affecting not only the immediate parties involved but also society at large. Moreover, the motivations behind subornation can vary widely. In some cases, individuals might be offered financial incentives, while in others, they may be threatened or coerced. This raises questions about the vulnerability of individuals within the legal system and highlights the need for protective measures. Legal systems around the world have established laws against subornation to deter such behavior and maintain the integrity of the judicial process. However, enforcement can be challenging, especially in cases where the suborned individuals are reluctant to come forward due to fear of retaliation. The ethical implications of subornation also warrant discussion. It forces us to confront the question of personal responsibility. If an individual succumbs to pressure and provides false testimony, to what extent are they culpable? While the instigator of subornation bears significant responsibility, the individual who is suborned also plays a role in the decision-making process. This duality complicates the narrative surrounding subornation and invites deeper reflection on human behavior and morality. In conclusion, subornation is a multifaceted issue that intersects law, ethics, and social trust. Its ramifications are profound, impacting not only the individuals directly involved but also the integrity of the legal system and society as a whole. To combat subornation, it is essential to foster an environment where truth and integrity are valued, and where individuals feel empowered to resist coercion. Education and awareness about the dangers of subornation can help cultivate a culture of honesty and accountability, ultimately strengthening the foundations of our legal and moral systems.

在法律和伦理的世界中，术语subornation指的是劝说某人实施非法行为，尤其是作伪证或伪证的行为。这个概念在法律背景下尤为重要，因为它突显了当个人被强迫或激励背叛自身诚信时可能出现的道德和伦理困境。subornation的影响不仅限于法律性；它触及到支撑我们社会结构的信任和诚实的基本要素。要理解subornation，必须考虑其对涉事个人以及更广泛社区的后果。当一个人被suborned提供虚假证词时，可能导致错误定罪，破坏司法系统，并侵蚀公众对法律机构的信任。例如，在一起备受瞩目的法庭案件中，如果证人被任何一方suborned，结果可能会偏向一方，导致司法误判。这种情况说明了subornation如何产生涟漪效应，不仅影响直接参与的各方，还影响整个社会。此外，subornation背后的动机可能千差万别。在某些情况下，个人可能会受到财务激励，而在其他情况下，他们可能会受到威胁或强迫。这引发了关于法律系统内个人脆弱性的质疑，并突显了需要保护措施的重要性。世界各地的法律系统已经建立了反对subornation的法律，以阻止这种行为并维护司法程序的完整性。然而，执法可能具有挑战性，尤其是在被suborned的个人因害怕报复而不愿出面的情况下。subornation的伦理含义也值得讨论。它迫使我们面对个人责任的问题。如果一个人屈服于压力并提供虚假证词，他们的责任程度是多少？虽然施加subornation的人承担着重大责任，但被suborned的个人在决策过程中也扮演着角色。这种二元性复杂化了围绕subornation的叙述，并邀请对人类行为和道德进行更深入的反思。总之，subornation是一个多方面的问题，交织着法律、伦理和社会信任。其影响深远，不仅影响直接相关的个人，也影响法律系统的完整性和整个社会。为了打击subornation，至关重要的是培养一种重视真相和诚信的环境，让个人感到有能力抵制强迫。有关subornation危害的教育和意识可以帮助培养诚实和问责的文化，最终加强我们法律和道德体系的基础。