spoliator
简明释义
英[/ˈspoʊliˌeɪtər/]美[/ˈspoʊliˌeɪtər/]
n. 抢劫者;掠夺者
英英释义
A spoliator is a person or entity that deliberately destroys, alters, or misuses evidence or property, typically in a legal context. | spoliator是一个故意破坏、改变或滥用证据或财产的人或实体,通常在法律背景下使用。 |
单词用法
同义词
反义词
例句
1.The time is a spoliator, carries off happily all.
时间是掠夺者,带走一切美好。
2.The time is a spoliator, carries off happily all.
时间是掠夺者,带走一切美好。
3.The court ruled that the evidence presented was tampered with by the spoliator, making it inadmissible.
法庭裁定,提交的证据被破坏者篡改,因此不可采纳。
4.Identifying the spoliator can be challenging in complex litigation cases.
在复杂的诉讼案件中,识别破坏者可能会很困难。
5.In legal terms, a spoliator is someone who alters or destroys evidence.
在法律术语中,破坏者是指改变或销毁证据的人。
6.If you suspect a spoliator is involved, it’s crucial to secure all potential evidence immediately.
如果你怀疑有破坏者参与,立即保护所有潜在证据至关重要。
7.The actions of the spoliator led to a mistrial due to the lack of reliable evidence.
由于缺乏可靠证据,破坏者的行为导致了审判无效。
作文
In the realm of law and ethics, the term spoliator is often used to describe a party that intentionally destroys or alters evidence relevant to a legal proceeding. This concept is crucial in maintaining the integrity of the judicial system, as the actions of a spoliator can significantly impact the outcome of a case. For instance, when a company faces litigation, it is expected to preserve all pertinent documents and electronic communications. However, if they are found to have destroyed evidence, they may be labeled as a spoliator, which could lead to severe legal repercussions, including sanctions or adverse inference rulings against them.The implications of being identified as a spoliator extend beyond mere legal penalties; they also tarnish the reputation of the involved parties. In many cases, the mere accusation of spoliation can lead to public distrust and skepticism. For example, in high-profile corporate lawsuits, if a corporation is accused of being a spoliator, it can face not only financial losses but also a decline in consumer confidence. Stakeholders may question the company's ethics and transparency, leading to long-term damage to its brand.Moreover, the legal framework surrounding spoliation varies across jurisdictions. Some regions have established clear guidelines on what constitutes spoliation and the penalties that follow. In contrast, others may have more ambiguous definitions, making it challenging for parties to navigate the complexities of preserving evidence. This inconsistency can lead to confusion and disputes in legal proceedings, further highlighting the importance of understanding the role of a spoliator in the justice system.To mitigate the risks associated with spoliation, organizations must implement robust document retention policies and training programs for employees. By fostering a culture of compliance and accountability, companies can reduce the likelihood of becoming a spoliator. Furthermore, legal counsel should be consulted regularly to ensure that all practices align with current laws and regulations regarding evidence preservation.In conclusion, the concept of a spoliator serves as a critical reminder of the importance of ethical behavior in legal contexts. The consequences of spoliation can be far-reaching, affecting not only the immediate parties involved but also the broader community's trust in the legal system. As such, understanding the responsibilities associated with evidence preservation is essential for anyone engaged in legal proceedings. The term spoliator encapsulates the potential pitfalls of neglecting these duties, emphasizing the need for vigilance and integrity in all aspects of legal practice.
在法律和伦理领域,术语spoliator通常用于描述故意销毁或更改与法律程序相关的证据的一方。这个概念对维护司法系统的完整性至关重要,因为spoliator的行为可能会显著影响案件的结果。例如,当一家公司面临诉讼时,预计它会保留所有相关的文件和电子通信。然而,如果发现他们已销毁证据,他们可能会被标记为spoliator,这可能导致严重的法律后果,包括制裁或对他们的不利推论裁决。被认定为spoliator的影响不仅限于法律处罚;还会损害相关方的声誉。在许多情况下,仅仅被指控为破坏证据就可能导致公众的不信任和怀疑。例如,在高调的企业诉讼中,如果一家公司被指控为spoliator,它可能面临的不仅是经济损失,还有消费者信心的下降。利益相关者可能会质疑公司的伦理和透明度,导致其品牌的长期损害。此外,关于破坏证据的法律框架在不同的管辖区之间有所不同。一些地区已经建立了明确的关于什么构成破坏证据及其后果的指南,而其他地区可能有更模糊的定义,这使得当事方在保存证据的复杂性中导航时面临挑战。这种不一致可能导致法律程序中的混乱和争议,进一步突显了理解spoliator在司法系统中角色的重要性。为了降低与破坏证据相关的风险,组织必须实施健全的文件保留政策和员工培训计划。通过培养合规和问责的文化,公司可以减少成为spoliator的可能性。此外,应定期咨询法律顾问,以确保所有实践符合当前关于证据保存的法律和法规。总之,spoliator的概念提醒我们在法律背景下伦理行为的重要性。破坏证据的后果可能是深远的,不仅影响直接相关方,还影响更广泛社区对法律系统的信任。因此,了解与证据保存相关的责任对于任何参与法律程序的人来说都是至关重要的。术语spoliator概括了忽视这些职责的潜在陷阱,强调了在法律实践的各个方面保持警惕和诚信的必要性。