euthanatizing

简明释义

[juːˈθænətaɪz][juːˈθænətaɪz]

vt. 对……施无痛致死术;使安乐死

第 三 人 称 单 数 e u t h a n a t i z e s

现 在 分 词 e u t h a n a t i z i n g

过 去 式 e u t h a n a t i z e d

过 去 分 词 e u t h a n a t i z e d

英英释义

The act of deliberately ending the life of a person or animal to relieve suffering, often due to terminal illness or severe pain.

故意结束一个人或动物生命以减轻痛苦的行为,通常是由于绝症或严重疼痛。

单词用法

euthanatizing an animal

安乐死一只动物

euthanatizing due to suffering

因痛苦而进行安乐死

the process of euthanatizing

安乐死的过程

ethically euthanatizing

伦理上安乐死

同义词

putting down

安乐死

The veterinarian recommended putting down the suffering animal.

兽医建议给痛苦的动物安乐死。

euthanasia

安乐死

Euthanasia is a controversial topic in many societies.

安乐死在许多社会中是一个有争议的话题。

mercy killing

仁慈杀戮

Some people believe that mercy killing should be legalized.

一些人认为仁慈杀戮应该合法化。

反义词

resuscitating

复苏

The doctors worked hard on resuscitating the patient after cardiac arrest.

医生们在心脏骤停后努力复苏病人。

saving

拯救

The rescue team was dedicated to saving as many lives as possible during the disaster.

救援队致力于在灾难中拯救尽可能多的生命。

reviving

复活

She believed in reviving old traditions to strengthen community bonds.

她相信复兴旧传统可以加强社区联系。

例句

1.After a thorough examination, the doctor recommended euthanatizing 安乐死 the horse due to its severe pain.

经过详细检查,医生建议由于马匹的剧烈疼痛进行安乐死

2.The shelter had to make difficult decisions regarding euthanatizing 安乐死 overcrowded animals.

收容所不得不对过于拥挤的动物做出关于安乐死的艰难决定。

3.Many people struggle with the ethics of euthanatizing 安乐死 pets that are suffering.

许多人在面对为受苦的宠物进行安乐死的伦理问题时感到挣扎。

4.In some cases, euthanatizing 安乐死 may be the most humane choice for suffering animals.

在某些情况下,安乐死可能是减轻受苦动物痛苦的最人道选择。

5.The veterinarian discussed the options for euthanatizing 安乐死 the terminally ill pet with the owner.

兽医与宠物主人讨论了为这只绝症宠物进行安乐死的选项。

作文

In recent years, the topic of animal welfare has gained significant attention in society. As we delve deeper into this subject, we often encounter the term euthanatizing, which refers to the act of intentionally ending the life of an animal to relieve it from suffering, typically due to illness or injury. This practice raises numerous ethical questions and emotional dilemmas for pet owners, veterinarians, and animal rights activists alike.The decision to euthanatize a beloved pet is never easy. Many pet owners struggle with the heart-wrenching choice of whether to prolong their pet's life, even if it means enduring pain and discomfort, or to choose a peaceful end. The emotional weight of this decision can be overwhelming, as pets are often seen as family members, providing companionship and unconditional love. It is essential to consider the quality of life that the animal is experiencing. If a pet is suffering from a terminal illness or severe injury with no hope of recovery, euthanatizing may be viewed as an act of compassion rather than cruelty.Veterinarians play a crucial role in guiding pet owners through this difficult process. They provide professional assessments of the animal's health and offer advice on the best course of action. Many veterinarians emphasize the importance of considering the pet's perspective. They often use specific criteria to evaluate whether an animal is in a state of suffering that warrants euthanatizing. These criteria may include factors such as the pet's ability to perform daily activities, the presence of chronic pain, and the overall prognosis for recovery.Moreover, the method of euthanatizing an animal is designed to be as humane and painless as possible. Veterinarians typically administer an overdose of anesthetic, allowing the animal to drift peacefully into unconsciousness before the heart stops beating. This procedure aims to minimize fear and discomfort for both the animal and the owner, creating a serene environment for the final moments.However, the ethical implications of euthanatizing extend beyond individual cases. Animal rights advocates often argue against the practice, suggesting that it reflects a failure to provide adequate care and support for animals in need. They advocate for alternative solutions, such as palliative care, which focuses on managing pain and improving the quality of life for animals facing terminal conditions. This approach emphasizes the value of life, even in its most challenging stages, and encourages pet owners to explore all options before making the final decision.Ultimately, the conversation surrounding euthanatizing animals is complex and multifaceted. It invites us to reflect on our values regarding animal welfare, compassion, and the responsibilities we hold towards our pets. Each situation is unique, and there is no one-size-fits-all answer. As we navigate these difficult waters, it is vital to approach the topic with empathy and understanding, recognizing the profound bond between humans and animals. In the end, the goal should always be to alleviate suffering and ensure that our beloved companions receive the dignity they deserve in their final moments.

近年来,动物福利的话题在社会上引起了显著关注。当我们深入探讨这个主题时,常常会遇到“安乐死”这个词,它指的是为了减轻动物的痛苦而故意结束其生命,通常是由于疾病或受伤。这一做法引发了许多伦理问题和情感困境,涉及宠物主人、兽医和动物权利活动家等各方。决定是否对心爱的宠物进行安乐死从来都不是一件容易的事。许多宠物主人在延长宠物生命的艰难选择中挣扎,即使这意味着要忍受痛苦和不适,还是选择一个平静的结局。这一决定的情感重担可能是压倒性的,因为宠物常常被视为家庭成员,提供陪伴和无条件的爱。考虑动物所经历的生活质量至关重要。如果一只宠物正遭受绝症或严重伤害且没有恢复希望,安乐死可能被视为一种同情而非残忍的行为。兽医在指导宠物主人度过这一艰难过程方面发挥着至关重要的作用。他们提供专业的健康评估,并就最佳行动方案提供建议。许多兽医强调考虑宠物的角度的重要性。他们通常使用特定标准来评估一只动物是否处于需要安乐死的痛苦状态。这些标准可能包括宠物执行日常活动的能力、慢性疼痛的存在以及整体恢复的预后。此外,安乐死动物的方法旨在尽可能人道和无痛。兽医通常会施用麻醉剂过量,使动物在心脏停止跳动之前平静地失去知觉。这一程序旨在最大限度地减少动物和主人在最后时刻的恐惧和不适,营造一个宁静的环境。然而,安乐死的伦理影响超出了个别案例。动物权利倡导者常常反对这一做法,认为这反映了未能为需要帮助的动物提供足够的护理和支持。他们倡导替代解决方案,例如姑息治疗,重点在于管理疼痛并改善面临绝症动物的生活质量。这种方法强调生命的价值,即使在最具挑战性的阶段,也鼓励宠物主人在做出最终决定之前探索所有选项。最终,围绕安乐死动物的对话是复杂而多面的。它邀请我们反思关于动物福利、同情心以及我们对宠物应承担的责任的价值观。每种情况都是独特的,没有一种放之四海而皆准的答案。在我们航行于这些困难水域时,重要的是以同情和理解的态度看待这一话题,认识到人类与动物之间深厚的纽带。最终,目标应该始终是减轻痛苦,确保我们心爱的伴侣在最后时刻获得应有的尊严。