retracted
简明释义
adj. 可伸缩的
英英释义
Withdrawn or taken back, especially in reference to a statement or claim. | 被撤回或收回,特别是指声明或主张。 |
To draw back or withdraw something that was previously stated or published. | 撤回或收回先前陈述或发布的内容。 |
单词用法
撤回声明 | |
撤回文章 | |
撤回主张 | |
撤回声明 | |
撤回提议 | |
撤回供词 |
同义词
反义词
断言 | 科学家在经过严格测试后断言他的发现。 | ||
确认 | 法院确认了先前的裁决。 | ||
维持 | 该决定被上级法院维持。 |
例句
1.He made a false confession which he later retracted.
他作了假供词,后来又翻供。
2.But in 2001, after failing to reproduce the results and finding that some of the data were suspect, the result was retracted.
但在2001年由于复制实验结果失败,再加上发现有些数据值得怀疑,于是收回了发布报告。
3.Here, you can see a side view of the bow plane and retract mechanism while retracted.
在这里,您可以看到一个侧面观的船头平面和收回机制,而收回。
4.Science retracted both papers.
科学篡改了这两篇论文。
5.Many DNA sequences, including those for harmful diseases, are already widely published, and can hardly be retracted.
而许多包括严重疾病在内的DNA序列也将大规模扩散并无法控制。
6.For whatever reason, Wakefield's work was fraudulent, and the paper was eventually retracted.
不管因为何种原因,维克·费尔德的研究都是不正确的,那篇论文最终也被撤回。
7.He retracted his comments during the live interview.
在直播采访中,他撤回了自己的评论。
8.The newspaper was forced to retract the false report.
这家报纸被迫撤回了那篇虚假的报道。
9.The scientist retracted his previous statement after discovering new evidence.
这位科学家在发现新证据后撤回了他之前的声明。
10.After much consideration, the author retracted the controversial article.
经过深思熟虑,作者撤回了那篇有争议的文章。
11.The company retracted its earlier promise of a salary increase.
公司撤回了之前关于加薪的承诺。
作文
In the world of academia and research, integrity is paramount. Scholars are expected to uphold the highest standards of honesty in their work. However, there are instances where mistakes occur, leading to the need for a paper or study to be retracted. A retraction is a formal withdrawal of a published work, often due to errors, misconduct, or ethical concerns. The process of retracting a paper is not taken lightly; it represents a significant step in maintaining the credibility of scientific literature. One notable case is that of a prominent researcher who published a groundbreaking study on a new medical treatment. Initially, the findings were celebrated and widely cited. However, as other researchers attempted to replicate the results, they found inconsistencies that raised questions about the validity of the original study. After a thorough investigation, it was revealed that the researcher had manipulated data to achieve favorable outcomes. As a result, the journal decided to retract the paper to preserve the integrity of the scientific community.The implications of a retraction can be far-reaching. For the authors, it can mean damage to their reputation and career. For the field of study, it can lead to confusion and mistrust among peers and the public. Thus, the act of retracting a paper serves not only to correct the scientific record but also to remind researchers of their responsibilities. It underscores the importance of transparency and accountability in research practices.Moreover, the rise of digital publishing has made the process of retracting papers more complex. With the ease of sharing information online, once a paper is published, it can spread rapidly across various platforms, making it difficult to contain misinformation. This highlights the necessity for journals to have clear policies regarding retractions and to communicate them effectively to their audience.In conclusion, the act of retracting a paper is a crucial mechanism for maintaining the quality and reliability of academic research. It serves as a corrective measure for the scientific community, ensuring that published works meet the required ethical and methodological standards. While the repercussions of a retraction can be severe for those involved, it ultimately protects the integrity of the scholarly record and reinforces the importance of rigorous peer review and ethical research practices. As we advance in our pursuit of knowledge, let us remember that integrity should always be at the forefront of our efforts, and the occasional need to retract a work should not deter us from striving for excellence in research.
在学术和研究的世界中,诚信至关重要。学者们被期望在他们的工作中保持最高标准的诚实。然而,有时会发生错误,导致需要对论文或研究进行撤回。撤回是对已发表作品的正式撤销,通常是由于错误、不当行为或伦理问题。撤回论文的过程并非轻而易举;这代表着维护科学文献可信度的重要一步。一个显著的案例是关于一位著名研究者的,他发表了一项关于新医疗治疗的突破性研究。最初,这些发现受到欢迎并广泛引用。然而,当其他研究者试图复制结果时,他们发现了不一致之处,这引发了对原始研究有效性的质疑。在经过彻底调查后,发现该研究者操纵数据以获得有利结果。因此,期刊决定撤回这篇论文,以维护科学界的诚信。撤回的影响可能是深远的。对于作者来说,这可能意味着声誉和职业生涯的损害。对于研究领域,这可能导致同行和公众之间的困惑和不信任。因此,撤回论文的行为不仅是为了纠正科学记录,还提醒研究人员他们的责任。这强调了透明度和问责制在研究实践中的重要性。此外,数字出版的兴起使得撤回论文的过程变得更加复杂。随着在线分享信息的便利,一旦论文发表,它可能迅速传播到各种平台,使得控制错误信息变得困难。这突显了期刊制定明确撤回政策的必要性,并有效地向其受众传达这些政策。总之,撤回论文的行为是维护学术研究质量和可靠性的关键机制。它作为科学共同体的纠正措施,确保已发表的作品符合所需的伦理和方法论标准。尽管撤回的后果可能对相关人员造成严重影响,但最终它保护了学术记录的完整性,并强化了严格的同行评审和伦理研究实践的重要性。当我们在追求知识的过程中前进时,让我们记住,诚信应始终处于我们努力的前沿,而偶尔需要撤回一项工作不应阻止我们在研究中追求卓越。