apriorism

简明释义

英[eɪˈpraɪəˌrɪzəm]美[ˌepraɪˈorɪzəm]

n. 先验论；推理结论

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Only the positivists consider all metaphysical speculations as nonsense and reject any kind of apriorism.

只有寊证论者把所有的形而上学的思考看作胡说，而拒绝任何先验论。

2.Only the positivists consider all metaphysical speculations as nonsense and reject any kind of apriorism.

只有寊证论者把所有的形而上学的思考看作胡说，而拒绝任何先验论。

3.Critics of apriorism 先验主义 argue that all knowledge must come from sensory experience.

对apriorism 先验主义的批评者认为，所有知识都必须来自感官经验。

4.Many mathematicians advocate for apriorism 先验主义 since mathematical truths seem to be self-evident.

许多数学家支持apriorism 先验主义，因为数学真理似乎是不言而喻的。

5.In philosophical discussions, the concept of apriorism 先验主义 is often contrasted with empiricism.

在哲学讨论中，apriorism 先验主义 的概念常常与经验主义相对比。

6.The theory of knowledge relies heavily on apriorism 先验主义, suggesting that certain truths are known without experience.

知识理论在很大程度上依赖于apriorism 先验主义，认为某些真理是无需经验就能知道的。

7.The debate between apriorism 先验主义 and empiricism has shaped modern epistemology.

在现代认识论中，apriorism 先验主义和经验主义之间的辩论塑造了当代思想。

作文

In the realm of philosophy, the concept of apriorism plays a pivotal role in understanding how knowledge is acquired and justified. Apriorism, which refers to the belief that certain concepts or knowledge are inherent and can be understood independently of experience, challenges the notion that all knowledge comes solely from empirical observation. This idea suggests that there are innate ideas or principles that exist within the human mind, allowing individuals to grasp fundamental truths without needing direct sensory experience. To illustrate this point, consider the field of mathematics. The principles of geometry, for instance, do not require physical examples to be understood. One can comprehend the concept of a triangle or the Pythagorean theorem without ever having seen a physical triangle. This innate understanding aligns with the notion of apriorism, as it posits that certain truths are self-evident and accessible through reason alone. On the other hand, empiricism, which stands in contrast to apriorism, argues that knowledge is derived from sensory experience. Empiricists contend that our understanding of the world is built upon what we observe, hear, taste, touch, and smell. They would argue that without empirical evidence, one cannot claim to know anything for certain. This philosophical debate between apriorism and empiricism raises important questions about the nature of knowledge and the validity of different sources of understanding. In practical terms, apriorism can have significant implications in various fields, including science, ethics, and even politics. For example, in scientific inquiry, researchers often rely on theoretical frameworks that are informed by aprioristic principles. These frameworks guide their hypotheses and experiments, suggesting that some foundational knowledge precedes empirical testing. Thus, while data collection is crucial for validating theories, the initial formulation of those theories may stem from an aprioristic understanding of the world. Moreover, in ethical discussions, apriorism can influence moral reasoning. Many ethical theories propose that certain moral truths are universally applicable and can be understood through rational thought. For instance, the idea that killing is wrong may be considered an aprioristic truth that does not require specific cultural or contextual evidence to be accepted. This perspective can lead to debates about moral relativism versus moral absolutism, where apriorism supports the latter. In conclusion, the concept of apriorism offers a fascinating lens through which we can examine the foundations of knowledge and understanding. By recognizing that some truths may exist independently of experience, we can appreciate the complexity of human cognition and the diverse ways in which we come to know the world around us. Whether in mathematics, science, or ethics, apriorism challenges us to consider the interplay between innate understanding and experiential learning, ultimately enriching our philosophical inquiries and everyday reasoning.

在哲学领域，概念先验主义在理解知识的获取和证明中发挥着关键作用。先验主义指的是某些概念或知识是固有的，并且可以独立于经验而被理解的信念，这一观点挑战了所有知识仅仅来自于经验观察的观念。这种想法表明，有一些内在的思想或原则存在于人类心智中，使个体能够在没有直接感官经验的情况下把握基本真理。为了说明这一点，可以考虑数学领域。例如，几何学的原则不需要物理例子来理解。一个人可以理解三角形的概念或毕达哥拉斯定理，而不必实际看到一个物理三角形。这种内在的理解与先验主义的观点相一致，因为它认为某些真理是自明的，可以通过理性获得。另一方面，经验主义与先验主义相对立，主张知识源于感官经验。经验主义者认为，我们对世界的理解是建立在我们所观察、听到、品尝、触摸和嗅到的基础上的。他们会争辩说，没有经验的证据，人无法声称确切地知道任何事情。这场关于先验主义和经验主义之间的哲学辩论提出了有关知识本质以及不同理解来源的有效性的重要问题。在实际层面上，先验主义在科学、伦理乃至政治等多个领域可能具有重要影响。例如，在科学研究中，研究人员通常依赖于由先验主义原则指导的理论框架。这些框架指导他们的假设和实验，暗示某些基础知识在经验测试之前就已经存在。因此，尽管数据收集对于验证理论至关重要，但这些理论的初步形成可能源于一种先验主义的世界观。此外，在伦理讨论中，先验主义可以影响道德推理。许多伦理理论提出某些道德真理是普遍适用的，并且可以通过理性思考来理解。例如，杀人是错误的这一观点可能被视为一种先验主义真理，不需要特定文化或背景证据来被接受。这种观点可能导致关于道德相对主义与道德绝对主义的辩论，而先验主义支持后者。总之，先验主义的概念为我们提供了一个引人入胜的视角，通过这个视角我们可以审视知识和理解的基础。通过认识到某些真理可能独立于经验而存在，我们可以欣赏人类认知的复杂性以及我们认识周围世界的多样方式。无论是在数学、科学还是伦理中，先验主义都挑战我们考虑内在理解与经验学习之间的相互作用，最终丰富我们的哲学探究和日常推理。