proscribe

简明释义

英[prəˈskraɪb]美[proʊˈskraɪb]

vt. 剥夺……的公权；禁止

第 三 人 称 单 数 p r o s c r i b e s

现 在 分 词 p r o s c r i b i n g

过 去 式 p r o s c r i b e d

过 去 分 词 p r o s c r i b e d

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.So I would have to proscribe every single aspect of my career, from my logo to the clothes that I wear.

所以我不得不拒绝每一个有关我的事业的简单的方面，从我穿的衣服的商标。

2.The crux of the dispute was an initiative by a few members to proscribe any broadcasts to aliens, whether or not we receive a signal first.

争议的核心是由少数成员倡议去禁止对外星人的任何广播，还是让我们先去接收它们发来的信号。

3.We do not proscribe any prayer.

我们不排斥任何的祷告。

4.UML does not proscribe any particular software development method or process; it merely standardizes the form of notation.

UML没有排斥任何特殊的软件开发方法或过程；它只不过标准化了标记法的格式。

5.We must respond to all those who seek to proscribe difference and the plurality of ideas, opinions and beliefs by protecting freedom through the wealth of our cultures and creative expressions.

有人竭力禁止不同和多元的思想、意见和信仰，对此，我们应利用我们丰富的文化和创作表现形式来保护自由。

6.Then there's everything else: the low-frequency words that are rarely used except in very specific situations: overpass, far-fetched, competency, proscribe, etc.

然后是其他剩下来的：除了特定情况否则极少用到的低使用率单字，例如高架桥、牵强的、资格、丧失公权……等。

7.We must respond to all those who seek to proscribe difference and the plurality of ideas, opinions and beliefs by protecting freedom through the wealth of our cultures and creative expressions.

有人竭力禁止不同和多元的思想、意见和信仰，对此，我们应利用我们丰富的文化和创作表现形式来保护自由。

8.The government decided to proscribe any form of hate speech.

政府决定禁止任何形式的仇恨言论。

9.Many countries proscribe the importation of endangered species.

许多国家禁止进口濒危物种。

10.Certain chemicals are proscribed under international law due to their harmful effects.

由于其有害影响，某些化学物质在国际法下被禁止。

11.The organization proscribes any form of discrimination within its policies.

该组织在其政策中禁止任何形式的歧视。

12.The school has proscribed the use of mobile phones during class hours.

学校已禁止在上课时间使用手机。

作文

In today's modern society, the concept of freedom is often celebrated as one of the fundamental human rights. However, with freedom comes the responsibility to ensure that this liberty does not infringe upon the rights of others. This delicate balance can sometimes lead to the need to proscribe certain behaviors or actions that may be deemed harmful or detrimental to society. To proscribe (禁止) something means to officially forbid it by law or other authoritative means. This essay will explore the implications of such prohibitions and how they affect our daily lives.One of the most notable examples of proscription in recent history is the banning of smoking in public places. Many governments around the world have taken significant steps to proscribe (禁止) smoking in restaurants, parks, and other communal areas. The rationale behind this decision is rooted in public health; secondhand smoke has been scientifically proven to pose serious health risks to non-smokers. By proscribing (禁止) this behavior, authorities aim to create a healthier environment for everyone. Although some smokers argue that this infringes on their personal freedom, the greater good of public health often takes precedence.Another area where proscription plays a vital role is in the realm of digital content. With the rise of the internet, issues surrounding hate speech, misinformation, and cyberbullying have become increasingly prevalent. Many social media platforms have implemented policies to proscribe (禁止) such content to foster a safer online community. For instance, Facebook and Twitter have strict guidelines that remove posts promoting violence or hatred against specific groups. This move to proscribe (禁止) harmful content reflects a growing recognition of the impact that online behavior can have on real-world interactions and the importance of protecting vulnerable populations.Moreover, laws against drug trafficking serve as another example of how societies choose to proscribe (禁止) certain actions for the welfare of their citizens. Governments worldwide have enacted strict regulations to proscribe (禁止) the sale and distribution of illegal drugs. These laws are aimed at curbing addiction rates and reducing the associated crime that often accompanies drug trafficking. While some debate the effectiveness of such measures, the intention remains clear: to protect individuals and communities from the dangers posed by these substances.However, the act of proscribing (禁止) behaviors or substances can also lead to unintended consequences. For example, when certain drugs are proscribed (禁止), it may push users towards more dangerous alternatives or create a black market that thrives on illegal transactions. Similarly, overly strict regulations can sometimes stifle legitimate businesses and innovation. Therefore, it is crucial for policymakers to carefully consider the implications of their decisions when choosing to proscribe (禁止) certain actions.Ultimately, the concept of proscription is a double-edged sword. While it is essential to proscribe (禁止) harmful behaviors to protect society, it is equally important to ensure that such measures do not infringe upon individual freedoms unnecessarily. Striking a balance between these two aspects is a challenge that requires ongoing dialogue, research, and consideration of varying perspectives. As we navigate the complexities of modern life, understanding the implications of proscription will remain a vital part of maintaining a just and equitable society.

在当今现代社会，自由的概念常常被视为基本人权之一而受到庆祝。然而，自由伴随着责任，确保这种自由不会侵犯他人的权利。这种微妙的平衡有时会导致需要proscribe某些可能被视为有害或对社会不利的行为或行动。proscribe（禁止）某事意味着通过法律或其他权威手段正式禁止它。本文将探讨这些禁令的影响以及它们如何影响我们的日常生活。最近历史上最显著的禁令之一是公共场所吸烟的禁令。世界各国的许多政府已经采取了重要措施，proscribe（禁止）餐厅、公园和其他公共区域的吸烟。这一决定的理由根植于公共健康；二手烟已被科学证明对非吸烟者构成严重健康风险。通过proscribing（禁止）这一行为，政府旨在为每个人创造一个更健康的环境。尽管一些吸烟者认为这侵犯了他们的个人自由，但公共健康的更大利益往往占据优先地位。另一个禁令发挥重要作用的领域是数字内容。在互联网兴起的背景下，仇恨言论、虚假信息和网络欺凌等问题变得愈发突出。许多社交媒体平台实施政策，以proscribe（禁止）此类内容，以促进更安全的在线社区。例如，Facebook和Twitter有严格的指导方针，删除宣传针对特定群体的暴力或仇恨的帖子。这种proscribe（禁止）有害内容的举措反映出对在线行为对现实世界互动影响的日益认识，以及保护弱势群体的重要性。此外，针对毒品贩运的法律是另一个例子，说明社会如何选择proscribe（禁止）某些行为以维护公民的福祉。全球各国政府制定了严格的法规，以proscribe（禁止）非法毒品的销售和分销。这些法律旨在遏制成瘾率并减少与毒品贩运相关的犯罪。虽然有些人对这些措施的有效性进行辩论，但意图仍然明确：保护个人和社区免受这些物质带来的危险。然而，proscribing（禁止）行为或物质的行为也可能导致意想不到的后果。例如，当某些药物被proscribe（禁止）时，可能会推动用户转向更危险的替代品，或产生蓬勃发展的黑市，依靠非法交易。因此，政策制定者在选择proscribe（禁止）某些行为时必须仔细考虑其决定的影响。最终，禁令的概念是一把双刃剑。虽然禁止有害行为以保护社会至关重要，但同样重要的是确保这些措施不必要地侵犯个人自由。在这两个方面之间取得平衡是一个挑战，需要持续的对话、研究和对不同观点的考虑。随着我们在现代生活的复杂性中航行，理解禁令的影响将继续成为维护公正和公平社会的重要部分。