spanking

简明释义

英[ˈspæŋkɪŋ]美[ˈspæŋkɪŋ]

adj. 强烈的；疾行的，疾驰的

n. 打屁股；拍击

adv. 显著地

v. 拍打；严厉斥责（spank 的 ing 形式）

复 数 s p a n k i n g s

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.In its spanking new 2.0 version, it's even more powerful.

其崭新的2.0版本更加强大。

2.And a third study by Straus, presented at a recent conference, ties nations' high rates of spanking to lower average IQs.

第三份报告也是斯图鲁斯撰写的，这份在不久前的一个大会上发表的研究报告将多个国家的儿童受体罚较多而平均智商下降的问题联系了起来。

3.You are the boy who spent your school fees on $10 worth of chicken wings thereupon getting a spanking from your mother.

小时候，他把学费拿来买10块钱的鸡翅，被妈妈打了一顿。

4.It isn't uncommon for parents to use spanking as a primary means of punishment in an authoritarian family.

在一个权威式家庭里，父母采用体罚作为主要惩罚手段的情况并不罕见。

5.Tall reeds responded to the spanking breeze.

高高的芦苇在劲风中摇曳。

6.Even within the US, a good spanking in one house is abuse in another.

因为就算在美国，善意地揍孩子一顿在另一个家庭会被认为是虐待。

7.Andrea gave her son a sound spanking.

安德里亚使劲地打了她儿子的屁股一下。

8.He received a light spanking as a reminder to behave better.

他受到了一次轻微的打屁股，以提醒他要更好地表现。

9.Some parents believe that spanking is an effective form of discipline.

一些父母认为打屁股是有效的管教方式。

10.The teacher gave the student a quick spanking for misbehaving in class.

老师因为学生在课堂上不守规矩而给了他一个快速的打屁股。

11.After the child threw a tantrum, the mother resorted to spanking him.

孩子发脾气后，母亲不得不对他进行打屁股。

12.The debate about whether spanking is harmful continues among psychologists.

心理学家们关于打屁股是否有害的争论仍在继续。

作文

The topic of discipline in parenting often brings about heated debates, especially when it comes to methods like spanking. Spanking is defined as a form of physical punishment where a parent strikes a child on the buttocks to correct behavior. Many parents have varying opinions on whether this method is effective or harmful. In this essay, I will explore both sides of the argument and share my perspective on the use of spanking as a disciplinary tool.On one hand, proponents of spanking argue that it can be an effective way to instill discipline in children. They believe that a swift slap on the bottom can serve as a wake-up call for children who are engaging in dangerous or disrespectful behavior. Supporters often cite their own experiences, claiming that they were spanked as children and turned out fine. They argue that spanking teaches children that actions have consequences, and it can deter them from repeating undesirable behaviors.However, there is a growing body of research that suggests spanking can have negative long-term effects on children. Studies indicate that children who are subjected to spanking may develop increased aggression, anxiety, and behavioral problems. Critics argue that spanking does not teach children why their behavior was wrong; instead, it only teaches them to fear punishment. This can lead to a breakdown in trust between parent and child, as children may become more secretive or rebellious if they fear being physically punished.Moreover, many child development experts advocate for alternative forms of discipline that do not involve physical punishment. Techniques such as positive reinforcement, time-outs, and open communication are often recommended as healthier ways to guide children’s behavior. These methods focus on teaching rather than punishing, allowing children to understand the reasons behind rules and expectations. For instance, instead of resorting to spanking, a parent might take a moment to explain why running in the house is dangerous, thereby fostering a more respectful and understanding relationship.In my opinion, while spanking might be seen as a quick fix, it ultimately fails to address the root causes of misbehavior. Children need guidance, not fear. They need to learn how to make better choices, and this requires patience and understanding from their parents. Instead of using spanking as a tool for discipline, I believe parents should focus on building a strong foundation of trust and communication with their children. This approach not only promotes better behavior but also strengthens the parent-child bond.In conclusion, the debate over spanking as a form of discipline is complex and multifaceted. While some parents may find it effective in the short term, the potential long-term consequences raise significant concerns. As society evolves, it is crucial for parents to consider the impact of their disciplinary methods and to seek alternatives that promote healthy emotional development. Ultimately, the goal of any form of discipline should be to guide children toward becoming responsible and respectful adults, without resorting to fear-based tactics like spanking.

在育儿中，纪律的话题常常引发激烈的辩论，尤其是涉及到像体罚这样的方式。体罚被定义为一种身体惩罚的形式，父母用手打孩子的臀部以纠正行为。许多父母对这种方法的有效性或有害性有不同的看法。在这篇文章中，我将探讨争论的双方，并分享我对使用体罚作为一种纪律工具的看法。一方面，支持体罚的人认为，这可以有效地在孩子身上灌输纪律。他们认为，迅速的掌掴可以成为孩子在从事危险或不尊重行为时的警钟。支持者常常引用自己的经历，声称他们在小时候也曾受到过体罚，并且长大后没问题。他们认为，体罚教会孩子行为是有后果的，并能阻止他们重复不良行为。然而，越来越多的研究表明，体罚可能对孩子产生负面长期影响。研究表明，遭受体罚的孩子可能会发展出更高的攻击性、焦虑和行为问题。批评者认为，体罚并没有教会孩子为什么他们的行为是错误的；相反，它只教会他们害怕惩罚。这可能导致父母与孩子之间信任的崩溃，因为孩子可能会变得更加秘密或叛逆，如果他们害怕受到身体惩罚。此外，许多儿童发展专家提倡采用不涉及身体惩罚的替代纪律形式。积极强化、时间限制和开放沟通等技巧通常被推荐为指导孩子行为的更健康方式。这些方法专注于教育而不是惩罚，让孩子理解规则和期望背后的原因。例如，父母可以花一点时间解释为什么在房子里跑步是危险的，而不是诉诸于体罚，从而促进更尊重和理解的关系。在我看来，虽然体罚可能被视为一种快速解决方案，但它最终未能解决不当行为的根本原因。孩子们需要引导，而不是恐惧。他们需要学习如何做出更好的选择，这需要父母的耐心和理解。我相信，父母应该专注于与孩子建立强大的信任和沟通基础，而不是使用体罚作为纪律工具。这种方法不仅促进了更好的行为，而且加强了亲子关系。总之，关于体罚作为一种纪律形式的辩论是复杂而多面的。虽然一些父母可能发现它在短期内有效，但潜在的长期后果引发了重大担忧。随着社会的发展，父母必须考虑他们的纪律方法的影响，并寻求促进健康情感发展的替代方案。最终，任何形式的纪律的目标都应该是引导孩子成为负责任和尊重的大人，而不是诉诸于像体罚这样的基于恐惧的策略。