monolithically

简明释义

英[ˌmɒnəˈlɪθɪkli]美[ˌmɑːnəˈlɪθɪkli]

adv.统一地；单一地

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.The Quad PD Arrays consist of four photodiodes monolithically integrated on a common indium phosphide (InP) substrate, and are fabricated using a low FIT rate InGaAs/InP semiconductor process.

方形光二极管阵列包括四个集成在通用磷化铟（InP）衬底上的光二极管单片集成电路，采用低制造、集成与测试率的铟镓砷化物/磷化铟半导体工艺制造。

2.The Quad PD Arrays consist of four photodiodes monolithically integrated on a common indium phosphide (InP) substrate, and are fabricated using a low FIT rate InGaAs/InP semiconductor process.

方形光二极管阵列包括四个集成在通用磷化铟（InP）衬底上的光二极管单片集成电路，采用低制造、集成与测试率的铟镓砷化物/磷化铟半导体工艺制造。

3.The device could be integrated monolithically and planarly with GaAs FET.

这种器件可与FET实现平面集成。

4.Also this trend motivates research on low-power, low-cost and monolithically integrated optic-fiber transceivers.

低功耗、低成本、高集成度的光接收发射机的研究方兴未艾。

5.The database was designed monolithically, making it hard to implement new features without downtime.

数据库是以单体式设计的，使得在没有停机的情况下实现新功能变得困难。

6.The software was designed to run monolithically in a single process, which made it difficult to scale.

该软件被设计为以单体式的方式在一个进程中运行，这使得它难以扩展。

7.When systems are built monolithically, any change can affect the entire application.

当系统以单体式构建时，任何更改都可能影响整个应用程序。

8.In traditional architecture, components are often built monolithically, leading to challenges in maintenance.

在传统架构中，组件通常是以单体式的方式构建的，这导致了维护上的挑战。

9.The company decided to break down their monolithically structured application into microservices.

公司决定将他们单体式结构的应用程序拆分为微服务。

作文

In today's fast-paced technological world, systems and structures are often designed to function monolithically. This term refers to the idea of a single, unified structure that operates as one cohesive entity. When we think about software architecture, for instance, many applications were traditionally built in a monolithically manner, meaning that all components of the application were tightly integrated into a single codebase. While this approach can simplify development and deployment in the short term, it can also lead to significant challenges as the application grows and evolves. One of the primary advantages of a monolithically designed system is its simplicity. Developers can easily manage the codebase since everything is contained within a single framework. This can lead to faster development cycles and quicker iterations, allowing teams to push updates and features more rapidly. Additionally, testing a monolithically structured application can be straightforward, as all components can be tested together. However, as applications scale, the drawbacks of a monolithically designed architecture become apparent. One major issue is that a change in one part of the system can inadvertently affect other parts, leading to potential bugs and system failures. This interdependence can make it challenging to implement new features or updates without risking the stability of the entire application. As a result, many organizations have begun to shift towards microservices architecture, which allows for greater flexibility and scalability. In a microservices approach, applications are broken down into smaller, independent services that can be developed, deployed, and scaled individually. This decentralization contrasts sharply with the monolithically integrated systems of the past.Despite these challenges, there are still scenarios where a monolithically designed application may be appropriate. For small projects or startups with limited resources, building a simple, monolithically structured application can be an effective way to get a product to market quickly. It allows teams to focus on delivering value without getting bogged down by the complexities of distributed systems. Additionally, for applications with minimal expected growth, a monolithically structured approach can provide sufficient performance and reliability. In conclusion, while the monolithically designed systems have their place in the development landscape, it is essential to recognize their limitations. As technology continues to advance and applications become more complex, the trend is moving towards more modular and flexible architectures. Understanding when to use a monolithically structured approach versus a more decentralized model will be crucial for developers and organizations looking to build robust and scalable applications. As we navigate this ever-evolving field, the key lies in finding the right balance between simplicity and complexity, ensuring that our systems can adapt to changing needs and demands. Overall, the concept of designing systems monolithically serves as a reminder of the importance of architectural choices in software development. Each decision carries weight and implications for the future of the application. By carefully considering these factors, developers can create solutions that not only meet current needs but also pave the way for future growth and innovation.

在当今快速发展的科技世界中，系统和结构通常被设计为以整体性的方式运作。这个术语指的是作为一个统一结构运作的单一整体。当我们考虑软件架构时，许多应用程序传统上是以整体性的方式构建的，这意味着应用程序的所有组件都紧密集成在一个代码库中。虽然这种方法可以简化开发和部署，但随着应用程序的增长和演变，它也可能导致重大挑战。整体性设计系统的主要优点之一是其简单性。开发人员可以轻松管理代码库，因为所有内容都包含在一个框架内。这可以导致更快的开发周期和更快的迭代，使团队能够更迅速地推动更新和功能。此外，测试整体性结构的应用程序可能是直接的，因为所有组件可以一起进行测试。然而，随着应用程序的扩展，整体性设计架构的缺点变得明显。一个主要问题是系统某一部分的变化可能会意外影响其他部分，导致潜在的错误和系统故障。这种相互依赖使得在不危及整个应用程序稳定性的情况下实施新功能或更新变得具有挑战性。因此，许多组织开始转向微服务架构，这种架构允许更大的灵活性和可扩展性。在微服务方法中，应用程序被分解为较小的独立服务，可以单独开发、部署和扩展。这种去中心化与过去的整体性集成系统形成鲜明对比。尽管存在这些挑战，但在某些情况下，整体性设计的应用程序仍然可能是合适的。对于小型项目或资源有限的初创公司而言，构建一个简单的整体性结构应用程序可以有效地将产品快速推向市场。它使团队能够专注于提供价值，而不必被分布式系统的复杂性所困扰。此外，对于预期增长有限的应用程序，整体性结构的方法可以提供足够的性能和可靠性。总之，虽然整体性设计的系统在开发领域中有其存在的意义，但认识到其局限性至关重要。随着技术的不断进步和应用程序变得更加复杂，趋势正朝着更模块化和灵活的架构发展。理解何时使用整体性结构的方法与何时采用更去中心化的模型，对于希望构建强大且可扩展应用程序的开发人员和组织来说，将是至关重要的。在我们应对这一不断发展的领域时，关键在于找到简单与复杂之间的平衡，确保我们的系统能够适应不断变化的需求和要求。总体而言，以整体性设计系统的概念提醒我们在软件开发中架构选择的重要性。每一个决策都承载着未来应用的重量和影响。通过仔细考虑这些因素，开发人员可以创建不仅满足当前需求，而且为未来增长和创新铺平道路的解决方案。