imperious
简明释义
adj. 专横的；迫切的；傲慢的
英英释义
Having or showing the arrogant attitude of someone who gives orders and expects to be obeyed. | 表现出命令他人并期望被服从的傲慢态度。 |
紧急的；迫切的。 |
单词用法
专横的态度 | |
强硬的要求 | |
专横的权威 | |
专横的语气 |
同义词
反义词
例句
1.She was imperious and Indian, and at the same time hot and sorrowful.
她像在印度时一样专横，同时又有点激动和难过。
2.At home, Mr Ahmadinejad's imperious and vindictive personality has alienated many conservatives, too.
在国内，内贾德傲慢和仇恨的个性同样疏远了许多保守派。
3.I cannot accept your imperious demands.
我不能接受你的专横要求。
4.The old nun was as imperious as ever, but visibly thawed when she saw the children.
老修女仍然像从前一样专横，看到孩子们时却显得温和多了。
5.To the commission's opponents, its actions look like imperious overreach.
对于欧委会的反对派来说，欧委会的行动显得有些欺人太甚。
6.The Concrete facing is a main imperious structure of rockfill dam.
混凝土面板是堆石坝的主要防渗体。
7.Novak Djokovic continued his imperious run of form by winning the Wimbledon men's singles title last Sunday.
德约科维奇上周日以一贯势如破竹的姿态赢得温布顿男子单打冠军。
8.Imperious in manner, he could be quite impersonal in his dealings with those whom he thought might impede his progress.
他虽然样子傲慢，但是和那些他认为会阻碍他前进的人打交道时，他可以相当客观。
9.The CEO's imperious manner made it clear that he expected complete obedience from his employees.
这位CEO的专横态度清楚地表明他期望员工完全服从。
10.He had an imperious need to control every aspect of the project.
他对控制项目的每一个方面有一种专横的需求。
11.The king's imperious decree was met with both fear and respect from his subjects.
国王的专横法令引起了臣民的恐惧与尊敬。
12.Her imperious tone left no room for discussion during the meeting.
她在会议上的专横语气没有留下讨论的余地。
13.The teacher's imperious demand for silence made the students uneasy.
老师对安静的专横要求让学生们感到不安。
作文
In the world of literature, characters often embody traits that reflect their personalities and roles in the narrative. One such trait is an imperious attitude, which signifies a commanding and domineering nature. This quality can be seen in various literary figures, notably in Shakespeare's plays where many characters display an imperious demeanor that shapes their interactions with others. For instance, in 'King Lear', the titular character exhibits an imperious disposition as he demands loyalty and respect from his daughters without considering their feelings or perspectives. This behavior ultimately leads to tragic consequences, illustrating how an imperious approach can alienate those closest to us.Moreover, the concept of being imperious extends beyond literature into real life, where individuals in positions of power may adopt an imperious style of leadership. Such leaders often prioritize their authority over collaboration and empathy, which can create a toxic environment. For example, a manager who rules with an imperious hand may stifle creativity and discourage open communication among team members. This not only affects morale but can also hinder productivity, as employees feel undervalued and disrespected.On the flip side, there are instances where an imperious attitude may be necessary. In crisis situations, strong leadership is crucial, and sometimes being imperious can help make swift decisions that save time and resources. However, it is essential for such leaders to balance their imperious tendencies with humility and openness to feedback, ensuring that their authority does not become a barrier to collaboration.Furthermore, the societal implications of an imperious mindset can be profound. In history, many regimes have been characterized by imperious rulers who prioritize their interests above the welfare of their citizens. This often leads to oppression and unrest, as the populace grows weary of being subjected to the whims of an imperious leader. The lessons learned from these historical examples emphasize the importance of accountability and the need for leaders to serve rather than dominate.In conclusion, while an imperious nature can sometimes be effective in asserting authority, it is crucial to recognize the potential drawbacks of such an approach. Both in literature and in real life, the consequences of being imperious can range from personal isolation to societal upheaval. Therefore, it is imperative for individuals in positions of power to cultivate a balance between strength and compassion, ensuring their leadership inspires rather than intimidates. By doing so, they can foster environments where collaboration thrives and everyone feels valued, ultimately leading to more sustainable success and harmony.
在文学世界中，角色往往体现出反映他们个性和叙事角色的特征。其中一个特征是专横的态度，意味着一种指挥和主宰的本质。这种品质可以在各种文学人物中看到，特别是在莎士比亚的戏剧中，许多角色表现出专横的举止，塑造了他们与他人之间的互动。例如，在《李尔王》中，主角表现出一种专横的性格，因为他要求女儿们对他忠诚和尊重，而不考虑她们的感受或观点。这种行为最终导致悲惨的后果，说明了专横的方式如何使我们最亲近的人疏远。此外，专横的概念不仅限于文学，它延伸到现实生活中，处于权力地位的个人可能会采取专横的领导风格。这种领导者通常将他们的权威置于合作和同情之上，这可能会造成有毒的环境。例如，一位以专横的手段统治的经理可能会抑制创造力，并阻碍团队成员之间的开放沟通。这不仅影响士气，还可能妨碍生产力，因为员工感到不被重视和不受尊重。另一方面，在某些情况下，专横的态度可能是必要的。在危机情况下，强有力的领导至关重要，有时专横的行为可以帮助做出迅速的决策，从而节省时间和资源。然而，重要的是此类领导者要平衡他们的专横的倾向，保持谦逊和对反馈的开放，以确保他们的权威不会成为合作的障碍。此外，专横的心态的社会影响可能是深远的。在历史上，许多政权的特征是专横的统治者，他们将自己的利益置于公民的福祉之上。这常常导致压迫和动荡，因为民众对被专横的领导者的任性感到厌倦。从这些历史例子中吸取的教训强调了问责制的重要性，以及领导者需要服务而非主宰。总之，虽然专横的本性在某些情况下可能在确立权威方面有效，但至关重要的是认识到这种方法可能带来的潜在缺点。无论是在文学中还是在现实生活中，专横的行为的后果可以从个人孤立到社会动荡。因此，处于权力地位的个人必须培养力量与同情之间的平衡，确保他们的领导能够激励而非恐吓。通过这样做，他们可以营造一个合作蓬勃发展的环境，让每个人都感到被重视，最终实现更可持续的成功与和谐。
