impracticably

简明释义

英[ɪmpˈræktɪkəbli]美[ɪmˈpræktɪkəbli]

adv. 没用地；不能实行地；无法可想地

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.To pick the apple by jumping up doesn't mean to set a high goal blindly and impracticably and indulge oneself in empty dreams and empty words ;

跳起来摘苹果，并不意味着盲目地不切实际地好高骛远，沉湎于空想空谈；

2.To pick the apple by jumping up doesn't mean to set a high goal blindly and impracticably and indulge oneself in empty dreams and empty words ;

跳起来摘苹果，并不意味着盲目地不切实际地好高骛远，沉湎于空想空谈；

3.The plan to build a bridge over the canyon was deemed impracticably 不切实际地 expensive by the engineers.

工程师认为在峡谷上建桥的计划是不切实际地昂贵的。

4.The idea of traveling across the country on foot is impracticably 不切实际地 time-consuming.

步行横穿全国的想法是不切实际地耗时的。

5.He suggested an impracticably 不切实际地 complex solution to the problem that no one could follow.

他提出了一个不切实际地复杂的问题解决方案，没人能理解。

6.The project was abandoned because the timeline was impracticably 不切实际地 tight.

这个项目被放弃，因为时间表不切实际地紧张。

7.Her demands were so impracticably 不切实际地 high that the negotiations broke down.

她的要求高得不切实际地让谈判破裂。

作文

In today's fast-paced world, the concept of efficiency is more important than ever. People are constantly seeking ways to improve their productivity and streamline their daily tasks. However, there are times when certain ideas or plans may seem appealing on paper but turn out to be impracticably (不切实际地) difficult to execute in reality. This raises an important question: how do we differentiate between innovative solutions and those that are merely theoretical? Take, for instance, the rise of remote working. Initially, many companies embraced this model as a way to enhance employee satisfaction and reduce overhead costs. While it has proven successful for some, others have found it impracticably (不切实际地) challenging to manage teams remotely. Communication barriers, lack of supervision, and feelings of isolation can hinder productivity rather than promote it. Thus, what seemed like a revolutionary approach became a source of frustration for many organizations.Similarly, consider the implementation of new technologies in traditional industries. For example, the agricultural sector has seen the introduction of advanced machinery and automated systems that promise to increase yield and efficiency. However, for many small-scale farmers, these technologies can be impracticably (不切实际地) expensive and complex to operate. The gap between technological advancement and practical application often leaves these individuals struggling to keep up, highlighting the disparity between innovation and accessibility.Moreover, urban planning initiatives frequently encounter similar challenges. City planners may propose ambitious projects aimed at improving public transportation or creating green spaces. While these initiatives are commendable, they can often be impracticably (不切实际地) costly and time-consuming. Communities may rally behind these ideas, only to find that the resources required to bring them to fruition are beyond reach. As a result, many well-intentioned projects remain unfulfilled dreams rather than actionable plans.The contrast between vision and reality is a recurring theme across various fields. In education, for example, the push for personalized learning experiences is gaining momentum. While tailored educational approaches can significantly benefit students, implementing such systems can be impracticably (不切实际地) complicated within existing frameworks. Teachers may lack the necessary training or resources to effectively customize lessons, leading to a disconnect between the ideal and the feasible.In conclusion, while innovation and forward-thinking ideas are essential for progress, it is crucial to recognize when concepts become impracticably (不切实际地) detached from reality. By grounding our aspirations in practicality, we can create solutions that not only inspire but also deliver tangible results. It is through this balance of vision and pragmatism that we can truly foster meaningful change in our world.

在当今快节奏的世界中，效率的概念比以往任何时候都更加重要。人们不断寻找提高生产力和简化日常任务的方法。然而，有时某些想法或计划在纸面上看起来很吸引人，但在现实中却变得不切实际地难以执行。这提出了一个重要的问题：我们如何区分创新解决方案和那些仅仅是理论上的？以远程工作为例，最初，许多公司拥抱这种模式，以提高员工满意度和降低间接成本。虽然这对一些公司证明是成功的，但其他公司发现管理远程团队变得不切实际地具有挑战性。沟通障碍、缺乏监督和孤立感可能会阻碍生产力，而不是促进它。因此，看似革命性的方法反而成为许多组织的挫败来源。同样，考虑到传统行业中新技术的实施。例如，农业部门引入了先进的机械和自动化系统，承诺提高产量和效率。然而，对于许多小规模农民来说，这些技术可能不切实际地昂贵且复杂。技术进步与实际应用之间的差距常常使这些个人苦苦挣扎，突显了创新与可及性之间的差距。此外，城市规划倡议也经常面临类似的挑战。城市规划者可能会提出雄心勃勃的项目，旨在改善公共交通或创建绿地。虽然这些倡议值得称赞，但它们往往可能不切实际地昂贵且耗时。社区可能会支持这些想法，却发现实现它们所需的资源超出可及范围。因此，许多善意的项目仍然是未能实现的梦想，而不是可行的计划。愿景与现实之间的对比是各个领域的一个反复出现的主题。在教育方面，例如，个性化学习体验的推动正在加速发展。虽然量身定制的教育方法可以显著惠及学生，但在现有框架内实施这样的系统可能是不切实际地复杂的。教师可能缺乏有效定制课程所需的培训或资源，导致理想与可行之间的脱节。总之，尽管创新和前瞻性思维的想法对进步至关重要，但认识到何时概念变得不切实际地脱离现实是至关重要的。通过将我们的愿望建立在实用性上，我们可以创造出不仅激励人心，而且能够带来切实结果的解决方案。正是在这种愿景与务实之间的平衡中，我们才能真正促进我们世界的有意义变化。