censor

简明释义

英[ˈsensə(r)]美[ˈsensər]

n. 检查员，审查官；潜意识抑制力；（古罗马）监察官

v. 审查，删改（书、电影、信件等）

复 数 c e n s o r s

第 三 人 称 单 数 c e n s o r s

现 在 分 词 c e n s o r i n g

过 去 式 c e n s o r e d

过 去 分 词 c e n s o r e d

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Edit yourself, but let someone else censor you.

调整自我，但让别人监督你。

2.I don't know if the other experts agreed or not. They seemed to censor themselves.

我不知道其他专家是否同意，他们好像检查了自己。

3.That's only one facet of the accumulating core: this purposive, self-centred focus of energy which is the 'me' the ego, the censor, the experiencer who judges the experience.

那只是积累的核心的一个方面：这个有目的的、强调自我的中心的能量就是“我”、自我、检察员、对体验作出判断的体验者。

4.You don't self-censor well and think that your opinion always matters.

你不太会自我反省，总认为自己的观点很重要。

5.Demanded the posters for her first and most censor-bitten film, "the Outlaw", in 1943.

可得看看她1943年的第一部电影《不法之徒》的海报，此片使得审片官如坐针毡。

6.This means that you don't censor your thoughts, but allow your mind to go freely to a problem and see what kind of solutions or ideas come up.

这意味着你不必审查你的想法，而是让你的大脑自由地去思考一个问题，看看会出现什么样的解决方案或想法。

7.Yesterday I went to my school to sortition decide whose paper will be in for examining by unitive censor. Then I took several pictures by the way.

昨天去学校抽签(决定是否参加全市统一的论文盲审)，顺便拍了几张照片。

8.That's only one facet of the accumulating core: this purposive, self-centred focus of energy which is the 'me' the ego, the censor, the experiencer who judges the experience.

那只是积累的核心的一个方面：这个有目的的、强调自我的中心的能量就是“我”、自我、检察员、对体验作出判断的体验者。

9.There is an urgent need to censor the net to remove inappropriate materials which children have online access to.

现在迫切需要监督网络，以消除孩子可以在网上看到的不当材料。

10.The artist felt that the censorship 审查制度 of his work stifled his creativity.

这位艺术家觉得对他作品的审查制度扼杀了他的创造力。

11.The government decided to censor 审查 the news articles that criticized its policies.

政府决定对那些批评其政策的新闻文章进行审查。

12.Many countries censor 审查 social media content to prevent misinformation.

许多国家对社交媒体内容进行审查以防止错误信息的传播。

13.The film was heavily censored 审查 before its release due to graphic violence.

由于影片中有大量暴力场面，该电影在上映前进行了严格的审查。

14.Some books are censored 审查 in schools for containing inappropriate content.

一些书籍因含有不当内容而在学校被审查。

作文

In today's digital age, the concept of censor (审查) has become increasingly relevant. The internet has provided a platform for free expression, but it has also raised concerns about the spread of harmful content. Governments and organizations often feel the need to censor (审查) certain materials to protect the public from misinformation, hate speech, and other potentially dangerous messages. However, the act of censoring (审查) can be a double-edged sword. While it may serve to shield individuals from harmful content, it can also infringe upon personal freedoms and the right to access information.One of the most significant debates surrounding censorship (审查) is the balance between safety and freedom. For instance, during times of political unrest, governments may censor (审查) news reports that portray them in a negative light. This raises questions about the ethics of censorship (审查) and whether it is justifiable in the name of national security. Critics argue that such actions undermine democracy and hinder the public's ability to make informed decisions.Moreover, the rise of social media has added another layer to the issue of censoring (审查). Platforms like Facebook and Twitter have their own guidelines on what constitutes acceptable content. They often censor (审查) posts that violate these guidelines, which can include anything from graphic violence to hate speech. While these measures are intended to create a safer online environment, they can also lead to accusations of bias and unfair treatment. Users may feel that their voices are being silenced, especially if they belong to marginalized groups.In educational settings, censorship (审查) can manifest in the form of book bans or restrictions on certain topics in the curriculum. Some educators argue that censoring (审查) specific materials limits students' exposure to diverse perspectives and critical thinking opportunities. On the other hand, parents and community members may advocate for censorship (审查) to protect children from inappropriate content. This ongoing conflict highlights the complexities of censorship (审查) in education and the need for open dialogue among all stakeholders.As technology continues to evolve, the methods of censoring (审查) content are also changing. With the advent of artificial intelligence, algorithms can now automatically detect and remove content deemed inappropriate. While this can be an efficient way to manage large volumes of information, it also raises concerns about the accuracy and fairness of these systems. If an algorithm mistakenly censors (审查) legitimate content, it can have far-reaching consequences for individuals and communities.In conclusion, the act of censoring (审查) is a complex issue that requires careful consideration. While it can protect individuals from harmful content, it also poses risks to freedom of expression and access to information. As society navigates the challenges of the digital age, it is crucial to strike a balance between safety and liberty. Open discussions about censorship (审查) and its implications will help foster an environment where diverse ideas can thrive while still ensuring the protection of vulnerable populations.

在当今数字时代，审查（censor）的概念变得越来越相关。互联网为自由表达提供了平台，但也引发了对有害内容传播的担忧。政府和组织常常感到需要审查（censor）某些材料，以保护公众免受错误信息、仇恨言论以及其他潜在危险信息的影响。然而，审查（censor）的行为可能是把双刃剑。虽然它可以保护个人免受有害内容的侵害，但也可能侵犯个人自由和获取信息的权利。围绕审查（censor）的一个重要辩论是安全与自由之间的平衡。例如，在政治动荡时期，政府可能会审查（censor）那些以负面方式描绘他们的新闻报道。这引发了关于审查（censor）伦理的问题，以及是否可以为了国家安全而合理化此类行为。批评者认为，这种行为破坏了民主，妨碍了公众做出明智决定的能力。此外，社交媒体的兴起为审查（censor）问题增添了另一个层面。像Facebook和Twitter这样的平台有自己的内容接受标准。他们通常会审查（censor）违反这些标准的帖子，这可能包括任何从图形暴力到仇恨言论的内容。虽然这些措施旨在创造更安全的在线环境，但也可能导致偏见和不公平对待的指控。用户可能会觉得他们的声音被压制，尤其是当他们属于边缘化群体时。在教育环境中，审查（censor）可能表现为书籍禁令或课程中某些主题的限制。一些教育工作者认为，审查（censor）特定材料限制了学生接触多元视角和批判性思维的机会。另一方面，家长和社区成员可能会倡导审查（censor），以保护儿童免受不当内容的影响。这场持续的冲突突显了教育中审查（censor）的复杂性，以及所有利益相关者之间开放对话的必要性。随着技术的不断发展，审查（censor）内容的方法也在变化。随着人工智能的出现，算法现在可以自动检测并删除被认为不当的内容。虽然这可能是管理大量信息的有效方法，但也引发了关于这些系统的准确性和公平性的担忧。如果算法错误地审查（censor）了合法内容，可能会对个人和社区产生深远的后果。总之，审查（censor）这一行为是一个复杂的问题，需要仔细考虑。虽然它可以保护个人免受有害内容的侵害，但也对自由表达和获取信息构成风险。随着社会在数字时代面临挑战，至关重要的是在安全与自由之间找到平衡。关于审查（censor）及其影响的公开讨论将有助于营造一个多元思想蓬勃发展的环境，同时确保保护弱势群体。