reelect

简明释义

英[ˌriːɪˈlɛkt]美[ˌriːɪˈlɛkt]

vt. 改选；重选

第 三 人 称 单 数 r e e l e c t s

现 在 分 词 r e e l e c t i n g

过 去 式 r e e l e c t e d

过 去 分 词 r e e l e c t e d

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.The 10 directorates member of Yahoo company is in reelect needs entirely on shareholder plenary meeting next time.

雅虎公司的10名董事会成员在下次股东大会上全部需要重选。

2.And this year, on November 6th, I'm filled with the same pride, that same enthusiasm, to press the button to reelect President Barack Obama!

今年十一月六日，我会带着同样的热情，同样的自豪，为奥巴马总统投下的那一票！

3.There are some objections to the proposal to reelect the chairman.

对重新选举董事长的提议有人持反对意见。

4.He persuaded them to reelect him by sheer force of personality.

他完全凭着人格力量说服人们再次选他。

5.And this year, on November 6th, I'm filled with the same pride, that same enthusiasm, to press the button to reelect President Barack Obama!

今年十一月六日，我会带着同样的热情，同样的自豪，为奥巴马总统投下的那一票！

6.Many voters are unsure if they want to reelect the current president.

许多选民不确定是否想要连任现任总统。

7.After a successful campaign, the senator was reelected by a large majority.

经过成功的竞选，这位参议员以大多数票连任。

8.The committee plans to reelect the chairperson next month.

委员会计划下个月连任主席。

9.In the upcoming election, he hopes to reelect his position on the school board.

在即将到来的选举中，他希望能在学校董事会中连任。

10.The citizens decided to reelect their mayor for another term.

市民决定连任他们的市长，继续任职。

作文

In a democratic society, the process of choosing leaders is vital for maintaining the health of the political system. One of the key aspects of this process is the ability of citizens to decide whether or not to reelect their representatives. The term reelect means to elect someone again to a position they have previously held. This decision can significantly impact the direction of policies and governance. When considering whether to reelect a politician, voters often evaluate their performance during their previous term. Are they fulfilling the promises made during the last election? Have they effectively addressed the issues that matter most to their constituents? These questions are crucial in determining if a leader deserves another chance to serve. For instance, if a mayor has successfully improved local infrastructure and reduced crime rates, residents may feel inclined to reelect them. Conversely, if a representative has failed to deliver on their commitments or has been involved in scandals, voters might choose not to reelect them. This process of accountability is fundamental to democracy, as it ensures that elected officials remain responsive to the needs of the people. Moreover, the act of reelecting can also reflect the political climate of the time. For example, during periods of economic stability and growth, incumbents might find it easier to gain support for reelection. However, in times of crisis or dissatisfaction with government performance, challengers may have a better chance of unseating an incumbent. Additionally, the concept of reelection extends beyond individual politicians to include larger political movements and parties. If a party has successfully implemented reforms that benefit the public, voters may choose to reelect the entire party to continue its agenda. In contrast, if the party has faced backlash due to unpopular decisions, it may struggle to maintain its position in the next election cycle. The implications of reelection are profound. It shapes not only the future of individual leaders but also the trajectory of national policy and governance. Voter turnout plays a significant role in this process; higher participation rates often favor incumbents, while lower turnout can lead to surprising results. Thus, it is essential for citizens to engage in the electoral process and make informed decisions about whom to reelect. In conclusion, the ability to reelect leaders is a cornerstone of democratic governance. It empowers citizens to hold their representatives accountable and influences the direction of government policy. As elections approach, it is crucial for voters to reflect on the performance of their elected officials and consider the impact of their choices. The decision to reelect should be based on a thorough evaluation of past actions and future potential, ensuring that democracy remains vibrant and responsive to the needs of the people.

在一个民主社会中，选择领导人的过程对于维护政治系统的健康至关重要。这个过程的一个关键方面是公民决定是否要连任他们的代表。术语连任意味着再次选举某人担任他们之前曾担任的职位。这个决定可能会对政策和治理的方向产生重大影响。在考虑是否要连任一位政治家时，选民通常会评估他们在上一届任期内的表现。他们是否履行了在上次选举中做出的承诺？他们是否有效地解决了对其选民最重要的问题？这些问题对于确定一位领导者是否值得再次服务至关重要。例如，如果一位市长成功改善了当地基础设施并降低了犯罪率，居民可能会倾向于连任他们。相反，如果一位代表未能兑现他们的承诺或参与丑闻，选民可能会选择不连任他们。这种问责过程是民主的基础，因为它确保当选官员对人民的需求保持响应。此外，连任的行为也超越了个别政治家，还包括更大的政治运动和政党。如果一个政党成功实施了有利于公众的改革，选民可能会选择连任整个政党以继续其议程。相反，如果该党因不受欢迎的决定而遭遇强烈反对，它可能会在下一个选举周期中难以维持其地位。连任的影响深远。它不仅塑造了个别领导者的未来，还影响了国家政策和治理的轨迹。选民投票率在这一过程中发挥着重要作用；较高的参与率通常有利于现任者，而较低的投票率则可能导致意外结果。因此，公民参与选举过程并对谁进行连任做出明智的决定至关重要。总之，连任领导人的能力是民主治理的基石。它赋予公民权力来追究他们代表的责任，并影响政府政策的方向。随着选举的临近，选民必须反思当选官员的表现，并考虑他们选择的影响。是否连任的决定应基于对过去行动和未来潜力的全面评估，以确保民主保持活力并回应人民的需求。