pedantic
简明释义
adj. 迂腐的;学究式的;卖弄学问的;假装学者的
比 较 级 m o r e p e d a n t i c
最 高 级 m o s t p e d a n t i c
英英释义
单词用法
迂腐的语气 | |
细节上的迂腐 | |
迂腐的做法 | |
对细节的迂腐批评 |
同义词
反义词
例句
1.But here, I'm just being a little more pedantic, that's really what a string is.
但是这里,我刚有点迂腐的,那实际上就是字符串。
2.This definition, though accurate, is equally as pedantic and useless as the first, from a practical point of view.
从实用角度看,这个定义尽管精确,但它和第一种描述一样,都是纸上谈兵、毫不实用。
3.I'm being slightly pedantic here.
我这里有点过于迂腐了。
4.In short, her entire musical approach was Romantic: intensely personal, full of light and shade, never pedantic.
简而言之,她的整个音乐风格都是浪漫的:非常个人化,充满明暗,从不迂腐。
5.Reading in a pedantic way may turn you into a bookworm or a bookcase, and has long been opposed.
读死书会变成书呆子,甚至于成为书橱,早有人反对过了。
6.And although you may anticipate that it's kind of pedantic, I really do want to illustrate something by it.
你们可能会觉得,这有些迂腐,但我想通过它来讲一些东西。
他这人有点儿迂腐。
8.The teacher's pedantic approach to grammar left little room for creativity in writing.
老师对语法的迂腐的方法几乎没有给写作留出创造的空间。
9.His explanations were so pedantic that they made the subject seem boring.
他的解释过于迂腐的,使得这个主题显得无趣。
10.She often criticized her colleagues for being too pedantic about details.
她常常批评同事们对细节过于迂腐的态度。
11.The book was filled with pedantic footnotes that distracted from the main story.
这本书充满了迂腐的脚注,让人分心,无法专注于主要故事。
12.His pedantic insistence on using the correct terminology annoyed everyone in the meeting.
他在会议上对使用正确术语的迂腐的坚持让每个人都感到烦恼。
作文
In today's fast-paced world, the importance of effective communication cannot be overstated. However, there are various styles of communication, some of which can hinder understanding rather than promote it. One such style is characterized by a tendency to be overly concerned with minute details and rules, often at the expense of clarity and engagement. This approach can be described as pedantic, which refers to an excessive focus on formalities and trivial details in teaching or writing. While precision can be beneficial, when taken to an extreme, it can alienate the audience and stifle meaningful dialogue.Consider the educational environment, where teachers play a crucial role in shaping students' understanding of complex subjects. A pedantic teacher might insist on adhering strictly to textbook definitions and methodologies, leaving little room for creative thinking or practical application. For instance, if a math teacher spends an entire class period discussing the intricacies of a theorem without allowing students to explore its real-world applications, the learning experience may become tedious and disengaging. Students may struggle to see the relevance of what they’re being taught, leading to frustration and disinterest.Moreover, in the realm of writing, a pedantic style can manifest as an obsession with grammatical correctness or sophisticated vocabulary that does not enhance the reader's understanding. An author who uses convoluted language and complex sentence structures in an attempt to showcase their intelligence may inadvertently create barriers for readers. Instead of facilitating comprehension, this approach can lead to confusion and disengagement. Readers often prefer clear, concise writing that communicates ideas effectively rather than being dazzled by ostentatious language.The challenge, then, is to strike a balance between accuracy and accessibility. Effective communicators understand that while details matter, the overarching goal is to convey ideas in a way that resonates with the audience. This means being mindful of the context in which information is presented and adjusting one's style accordingly. In a classroom setting, a good teacher will not only provide accurate information but also encourage discussion, questions, and exploration. They will recognize that learning is a collaborative process, and sometimes it is more valuable to foster curiosity than to adhere strictly to a curriculum.In professional settings, the same principle applies. A pedantic approach in business communication can lead to misunderstandings and inefficiencies. For example, if a project manager focuses excessively on technical jargon and detailed specifications without considering the audience's familiarity with the subject matter, team members may feel lost or overwhelmed. Effective leaders know how to tailor their messages to ensure that everyone is on the same page, fostering an inclusive atmosphere that encourages participation and innovation.In conclusion, while attention to detail is undoubtedly important, an overly pedantic approach can detract from effective communication. Whether in education, writing, or professional interactions, it is essential to prioritize clarity and engagement over mere adherence to rules and formalities. By doing so, we can create environments that inspire learning, collaboration, and creativity, ultimately leading to more meaningful exchanges of ideas. The goal should always be to connect with others, share knowledge, and foster understanding, rather than getting lost in the minutiae of technicalities.
在当今快节奏的世界中,有效沟通的重要性不容小觑。然而,沟通的风格各异,其中一些可能会妨碍理解,而不是促进它。一种这样的风格是过于关注细微的细节和规则,常常以清晰度和参与感为代价。这种方法可以被描述为pedantic,指的是在教学或写作中过分关注形式和琐碎细节。虽然精确性是有益的,但当这种关注达到极端时,它可能会使听众感到疏远并压制有意义的对话。考虑教育环境,教师在塑造学生对复杂学科的理解方面发挥着至关重要的作用。一个pedantic的老师可能会坚持严格遵循教科书定义和方法论,而几乎不给学生留出创造性思维或实际应用的空间。例如,如果一位数学老师花整个课堂讨论定理的复杂性,而不让学生探索其现实世界的应用,学习体验可能会变得乏味和无趣。学生可能会难以看到他们所学内容的相关性,从而导致沮丧和缺乏兴趣。此外,在写作领域,pedantic风格可能表现为对语法正确性或复杂词汇的痴迷,而这些并未增强读者的理解。一个试图通过使用复杂语言和复杂句子结构来展示自己智慧的作者,可能无意中为读者设置了障碍。与其促进理解,这种方法可能会导致困惑和失去兴趣。读者通常更喜欢清晰、简洁的写作,这能有效传达思想,而不是被华丽的语言所吸引。因此,挑战在于在准确性和可及性之间找到平衡。有效的沟通者明白,虽然细节很重要,但首要目标是以一种与听众产生共鸣的方式传达思想。这意味着要关注信息呈现的上下文,并相应地调整自己的风格。在课堂上,一位优秀的教师不仅会提供准确的信息,还会鼓励讨论、提问和探索。他们会意识到学习是一个合作的过程,有时候培养好奇心比严格遵循课程大纲更有价值。在专业环境中,同样的原则适用。在商业沟通中,pedantic的方法可能导致误解和低效。例如,如果项目经理过于关注技术术语和详细规范,而没有考虑听众对主题的熟悉程度,团队成员可能会感到迷失或不知所措。有效的领导者知道如何调整他们的信息,以确保每个人都在同一页面上,营造一种包容的氛围,鼓励参与和创新。总之,尽管关注细节无疑是重要的,但过于pedantic的方法可能会削弱有效沟通。无论是在教育、写作还是专业互动中,优先考虑清晰度和参与感,而不是单纯遵循规则和形式都是至关重要的。通过这样做,我们可以创造出激励学习、合作和创造力的环境,最终导致更有意义的思想交流。目标应该始终是与他人建立联系,分享知识,促进理解,而不是迷失在技术细节的琐碎中。